Carteret

Devils4121 · #1 (**permalink**) 07-01-2009, 07:30 PM

Does anyone know the OEM transmite frequency for Carteret. It is not posted on the database.

Thanks

robertpearsall · #2 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 05:49 AM

Carteret OEM input is 475.37500

Boss · #3 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 10:30 AM

From Jim Robbins Scanning page , it list Carteret OEM 472.3750 PL 103.5

radiomanNJ1 · #4 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 11:12 AM

Another hacker. The 472 mhz freq. is repeated why would you need the input? I am sure they don't need someone keying up on their freq.

Above 470 mzh the standard input is 3 mhz higher.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Devils4121

Does anyone know the OEM transmite frequency for Carteret. It is not posted on the database.

Thanks

DJ88 · #5 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boss

From Jim Robbins Scanning page , it list Carteret OEM 472.3750 PL 103.5

That's the output frequency, and is in fact, listed on the RR Database also. He was asking for the input frequency, which is not listed there.

W2SJW · #6 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 05:42 PM

I've got to agree with radiomanNJ1, there are a bunch of people that have been appearing on the NJ & NY forums that only have a few posts/are newly registered that are asking for some pretty sensitive info.

I won't even begin to count the number of people asking me on PM's for NYPD input frequencies & PL's....

DannB · #7 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 06:28 PM

RELAX RELAX W25JW there is no need to go and alert homeland security YOUR always moanin about something everytime i see you post

W2SJW · #8 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DannB

RELAX RELAX W25JW there is no need to go and alert homeland security YOUR always moanin about something everytime i see you post

Me, moaning? Don't make me laugh! I'm pretty sure that a number of the guys here in the NJ forum can vouch for the fact that I NEVER get involved in the pissing matches/complaining that goes on here - just search my posts & that will summarize itself quite nicely...

Aggressive retaliation is a classic sign of a guilty conscience...

In the famous words of Rodney King: "Can't we all just get along?"

DJ88 · #9 (**permalink**) 07-02-2009, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W2SJW

I've got to agree with radiomanNJ1, there are a bunch of people that have been appearing on the NJ & NY forums that only have a few posts/are newly registered that are asking for some pretty sensitive info.

I won't even begin to count the number of people asking me on PM's for NYPD input frequencies & PL's....

Most input frequencies are posted right here on the database, and if they can't be found here, they're listed on the FCC database for everyone to see. If someone wants that information, it's right at their fingertips. Sensitive? I would think if it were, it wouldn't be as readily available as it is.

kb2vxa · #10 (**permalink**) 07-03-2009, 08:24 PM

Come on guys, I've known Scott from long before he ever heard of RR so the simple fact is you misunderstood his post. Sure, anyone truly interested and resourceful can find the required information to conduct a radio "terrorist attack" but what we have here is the usual "Why bother to think for myself when it's easier to ask?" Looks to me Scott is more annoyed by these pests than any security issues, right big guy?

Now when it comes to security issues I remember a fairly recent and rather heated thread about why one shouldn't post information regarding ongoing investigations and surveillance ops but I won't open that can of worms again, I'll just let you think about what it means to use simple common sense. Maybe that's why I'll never tell you how I discovered all I need to know in order to hack a radio system long before RR, the FCC database or scanners with various search features ever existed.

Tac-1 · #11 (**permalink**) 07-04-2009, 08:00 AM

Most T Band 470-512 are 3mhz Up & 450 - 464 5Mhz Up, maybe he wants to do some thing stupid like jam the channel or play his favorite tunes on it Until they track him down! and then he can play jailhouse rock all day or he just wants to see how far he can receive on the input

DJ88 · #12 (**permalink**) 07-04-2009, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kb2vxa

.......but what we have here is the usual "Why bother to think for myself when it's easier to ask?" Looks to me Scott is more annoyed by these pests than any security issues, right big guy?

He's baaaaaaaaack, and picking up right where he left off. It looks like it's time to reach for the Preparation-H again.

Devils4121 · #13 (**permalink**) 07-04-2009, 10:25 PM

I was doing a detail in Carteret on friday, I didnt know it was such a big deal!!!

DJ88 · #14 (**permalink**) 07-05-2009, 08:21 AM

It's not a big deal. Some people just like to make it that way. As I said, input frequency information is no big secret. It's readily available, and those who want it don't always want it for "criminal" reasons. Just because someone wants an input frequency, or a PL/DPL for an input doesn't necessarily mean they're up to no good. We all use different information to enhance our ability to monitor. As for kb2vxa's comments, don't be offended by them, or think you're special because they were directed at you. He treats just about everybody the same way. He rarely has anything worthwhile to contribute except for derogatory comments that provide absolutely nothing of value to the topic at hand. He was temporarily banned from this site not too long ago, for what I'm assuming was his conduct, but he's back again and right back at it. Have a nice day.

kb2vxa · #15 (**permalink**) 07-07-2009, 03:32 PM

DJ, I kindly ask you to please refrain from making defamatory remarks about me especially when they are entirely false. Now what proof do you offer that I aimed any comment at any person in particular when it's a fair bet you have absolutely no idea who Scott was talking about?

"I won't even begin to count the number of people asking me on PM's for NYPD input frequencies & PL's."

You are far out of line with your personal attacks and you have the nerve to talk about MY conduct of which you ASSUME? You know what they say about "assume" so I need not remind you of what you have done beyond pots and kettles throwing stones. This having been said in my defense I end it here, I'll not be trolled into a mud slinging match.

Sinister · #16 (**permalink**) 07-07-2009, 05:34 PM

Please get back on topic

radiomanNJ1 · #17 (**permalink**) 07-08-2009, 06:13 AM

Exactly, reading and understanding, the posts. Why would he need the input unless he was going to start kerchunking the repeater? It's a repeated freq. You can hear both sides of the conversation. Don't give me he needs to know if an OEM operator is in his neighborhood so he wants to listen to the input. Since all T-Band inputs are 3mhz higher (except certain NYC stuff) it's a possible desire to kerchunk and or harass the dispatcher/operators.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ88

That's the output frequency, and is in fact, listed on the RR Database also. He was asking for the input frequency, which is not listed there.

ob123 · #18 (**permalink**) 07-08-2009, 04:24 PM

I have known Devils4121 for a long time, he IS on an OEM that was assisting Carteret OEM with a detail for the fireworks that night. No need for you guys to start flipping out over this one.

Also, I do believe SOME people gather this kind of info for bad reasons, but MOST people have a good intent for it in my opinion. Plus, as said before, most of this kind of information is easy to obtain if you look for it.