RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Ohio Radio Discussion Forum

Ohio Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Ohio.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #861 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 10:53 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bratenahl Ohio
Posts: 223
Default TG 56578

After logging 109 hits tonight on TG 56578 and hearing a couple of references to TAC-1 and the addresses used I think we submit this TG as CMHA TAC-1.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #862 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:02 PM
tylerwatt12's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 136
Default

Do TAC channels usually run plates?
Dispatch for 56578 is 1036 which is CMHA Disp 1
Did you log a time of day when you heard them mention TAC 1?
Reply With Quote
  #863 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:05 PM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 4,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerwatt12 View Post
Do TAC channels usually run plates?
Dispatch for 56578 is 1036 which is CMHA Disp 1
Did you log a time of day when you heard them mention TAC 1?
Isn't 1036 just a console radio? No reason it couldn't be seen on more than one TG. And 56576 (according to the DB) is Disp 1, not 56578

mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197/BCD436HP/BCD536HP

If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
  #864 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:16 PM
tylerwatt12's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtindor View Post
Isn't 1036 just a console radio? No reason it couldn't be seen on more than one TG. And 56576 (according to the DB) is Disp 1, not 56578

mike
You're not wrong. I saw 1036 (and later 1037) on 56578. But I think it is related to CHMA, because it's also near the rest of the CHMA TGs
Reply With Quote
  #865 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:47 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerwatt12 View Post
You're not wrong. I saw 1036 (and later 1037) on 56578. But I think it is related to CHMA, because it's also near the rest of the CHMA TGs
Yes 1036 & 1037 are console id's used by the CMHA dispatchers. As Mike pointed out the dispatcher (who's on a console) can communicate on any TG assigned to it, just like any other radio. The CMHA radio's in the field have 1863xxx id's.

FYI: Per reports from user on this forum the CMHA Dispatch TG is 56576, CMHA Channel 2 is 56577, CMHA TAC 1 is 56578 and CMHA TAC 3 is 56580.
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #866 (permalink)  
Old 12-07-2013, 11:49 PM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 4,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by budevans View Post
Yes 1036 & 1037 are console id's used by the CMHA dispatchers. As Mike pointed out the dispatcher (who's on a console) can communicate on any TG assigned to it, just like any other radio. The CMHA radio's in the field have 1863xxx id's.

FYI: Per reports from user on this forum the CMHA Dispatch TG is 56576, CMHA Channel 2 is 56577, CMHA TAC 1 is 56578 and CMHA TAC 3 is 56580.
And given that info, I filled in CMHA Tac 2 (shhhhh, don't tell anyone)

Mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197/BCD436HP/BCD536HP

If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
  #867 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:00 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtindor View Post
And given that info, I filled in CMHA Tac 2 (shhhhh, don't tell anyone)

Mike
I can neither confirm nor deny any information regarding CMHA Tac 2.
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500
Reply With Quote
  #868 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:01 AM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 4,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by budevans View Post
I can neither confirm nor deny any information regarding CMHA Tac 2.
ROFL. That makes two of us.
Reply With Quote
  #869 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 10:42 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default TG56289 N Royalton FG-1?

Just a few minutes ago I monitored North Royalton Fire Station Alert dispatch an engine to a possible fire (on TG56421).

Right after the dispatch, on a new TG (56289) I heard a second North Royalton Fire engine call to the first dispatched engine asking if they needed additional support. TG56289 sits between Middleburg Hts. FG -1 (56288) and Olmstead Falls FG-1 (56290).

So my first guess would be that TG56289 is North Royalton FG-1.
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #870 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 11:02 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 875
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by budevans View Post
Just a few minutes ago I monitored North Royalton Fire Station Alert dispatch an engine to a possible fire (on TG56421).

Right after the dispatch, on a new TG (56289) I heard a second North Royalton Fire engine call to the first dispatched engine asking if they needed additional support. TG56289 sits between Middleburg Hts. FG -1 (56288) and Olmstead Falls FG-1 (56290).

So my first guess would be that TG56289 is North Royalton FG-1.
TG56289 North Royalton FG-1 is already in the database. But Middlebugh Hts and Olmsted Falls info is not.
Reply With Quote
  #871 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 11:15 AM
KWs's Avatar
KWs KWs is offline
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kent , Ohio
Posts: 420
Default

Do we have all the southwest suburbs Fire TGs identified, but just not confirmed ?
Where did 56288 and 56290 come from ?
Adding them to my HP 1 for confirmation .....
__________________
KWs
Reply With Quote
  #872 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 11:44 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed_Azalea View Post
TG56289 North Royalton FG-1 is already in the database. But Middlebugh Hts and Olmsted Falls info is not.
Well that's interesting.

I have just a couple of hits for both Middleburg Hts and Olmstead Falls FG-1 but this is the first for North Royalton FG-1.

I'm looking at my prior entries in WIN500 to see if I can find the date or dates I got the hits. May be I just happened to catch some radio setup testing.

Ok, I based on my WIN500 (past entries) I got the hits for Middleburg Hts and Olmstead Falls FG-1 in the last week (nothing in last Monday's file, hits show up in Saturdays).

More good(?) news, I show FG-2 hits (again just a couple) for Middleburg Hts. (56296) and Olmstead Fls (56298).

So following the pattern, I wonder if North Royalton FG-2 is 56297???
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500
Reply With Quote
  #873 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:06 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 875
Wink

Well you guys/gals are very dedicated to be able to figure this stuff out. I appreciate that someone else has verified this stuff and I just update my info.... and scan...in the background...

Last edited by Ed_Azalea; 12-08-2013 at 12:24 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #874 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:10 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 875
Default

Also...is Middleburg Hts Fire dispatch known? I still hear what I think is them on regular MARCS...
Reply With Quote
  #875 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:11 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KWs View Post
Do we have all the southwest suburbs Fire TGs identified, but just not confirmed ?
Where did 56288 and 56290 come from ?
Adding them to my HP 1 for confirmation .....
Well I don't... But I do have what could be a range of Fire related TG's, from 56283 to 56299.

56283 - 862 hits and no id, possible 1838xxx radio id
56284 - 18 hits, no id
56285 - 80 hits, no id
56286 - 0 hits
56287 - 14 hits, Brook Park FG -1 in the rr database
56288 - 2 hits, Middleburg Hts FG-1? unconfirmed radio tests/checks
56589 - 1 hit, North Royalton FG-1 in the rr database
56290 - 2 this, Olmstead Falls FG-1? unconfirmed radio tests/checks
56291 - 56295 - no hits
56296 - 2 hits, Middleburg Hts FG-2? unconfirmed radio tests/checks
56297 - 0 hits
56298 - 2 hits, Olmstead Falls FG-2? unconfirmed radio tests/checks
56299 - 1 hit, no id

May be others have info to help fill the blanks.
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500

Last edited by budevans; 12-08-2013 at 12:18 PM.. Reason: added highlites
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #876 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 12:23 PM
OH DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 591
Default

I'll try to jump in and help out a bit here.

I just updated my HP-1 and added GCRCN to my favorites lists. I didn't think I could pick up Cleveland from around Akron Fulton. I was wrong. Hope they don't turn down the output wattage.

I'll try to keep my radio in discovery mode when I'm not around.
__________________
Frank
Reply With Quote
  #877 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 1:29 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 11
Default Simulcast reception on GCRCN

I live in Cleveland (Westpark) and have a discone antenna mounted 30 feet above ground with good coax connected to two BC996T scanners via a Stridsberg multi-coupler. I found out after much experimenting that this antenna system may have actually hindered my ability to listen to GCRCN.

I noticed that I wasn't able to pick up ANY traffic depite full signal strength. I tried using the telescopic antenna plugged into the back of the radio that came with the scanner and found that it immediately solved the problem. I think I could be too close to the GCRCN tower sites, and my outdoor scanner antenna system was causing the scanner to become overloaded. The P25 audio and decode is very good too, hardly any garbled transmissions. I thought I might post this in case people in Cleveland or close to a tower site were having the same problem.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #878 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2013, 6:00 PM
tylerwatt12's Avatar
Member
  Shack Photos
Shack photos
Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 136
Default

This is what I have

56283 - 5 hits and RIDs 1821146, 1828067, 1828067, 1879440 (recordings, but no audio decoded)
56284 - 0 hits
56285 - 3 hits, (no recordings)
56286 - 0 hits
56287 - 43 hits, Brook Park FG -1 in the rr database
56288 - 2 hits, RIDs 1870803 and 1870823 (recordings, but no audio decoded)
56589 - confirmed as North Royalton FG-1 via radio engineer broadcast
56290 - 56295 0 hits
56296 - 1 hit, (no recordings)
56297 - 56299 0 hits
Reply With Quote
  #879 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2013, 9:38 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 728
Default Two North Royalton Alpha Tags are reversed

I entered a Submission to the database to correct the following Alpha Tags.

TG56421 is North Royalton Fire Dispatch, the Alpha is showing as FG-1.

TG56289 is North Royalton Fire Ground 1, the Alpha is showing Dsp.

Note: The Description and Tag fields are correct.
__________________
Bud
Pro-34/Pro-97/PSR-500
Reply With Quote
  #880 (permalink)  
Old 12-09-2013, 9:41 AM
mtindor's Avatar
OH/WV DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Jefferson County, Ohio
Posts: 4,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by budevans View Post
I entered a Submission to the database to correct the following Alpha Tags.

TG56421 is North Royalton Fire Dispatch, the Alpha is showing as FG-1.

TG56289 is North Royalton Fire Ground 1, the Alpha is showing Dsp.

Note: The Description and Tag fields are correct.
Thanks, Bud. Corrected. I just noticed that you said you submitted this. Another admin will pick that up, but it is already worked.

Mike
__________________
Mike / AA8IA
PSR800/PRO197/BCD436HP/BCD536HP

If I PM you about a submission, please reply promptly or your submission may be rejected.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
sticky

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions