What Nexts?

[Robinsmark]

Piers "don't check the facts" Morgan

Besides call America's gun owners a bunch of "Savages" this guy looks straight in the camera and PROUDLY announces that after the Dunblane school shootings in England, the British Government moved to ban all private ownership of firearms.After which there were NO MORE mass shootings. WRONG... It took me 30 seconds of internet searching to find one in Cumbria England in 2010 where a deranged taxi driver drove around the countryside and killed 12 people. OH..by the way HE DID NOT USE AN ASSAULT RIFLE. Don't bother to check the facts journalism courtesy of Piers Morgan!

[ridgescan]

put a black pointed hat on his fat head, a black cape, and slap an old broom under his butt and you have the classic wicked witch herself.

[kc0vgj]

According to the new DHS report: American are the new terrorists….
Are You the following:

-”anti-global”
-”suspicious of centralized federal authority”
-”reverent of individual liberty”
-”believe in conspiracy theories”
-”a belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack”
-”a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
-”impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
-”insert religion into the political sphere”
-”those who seek to politicize religion”
-”supported political movements for autonomy”
-”anti-abortion”
-”anti-nuclear”

All of the above are direct quotes from the report.
Do any of those beliefs apply to you?

IF SO YOU ARE A TERRORIST!!!

[rdale]

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

According to the new DHS report: American are the new terrorists….

Can you post a link to that report?

[kc0vgj]

http://start.umd.edu/start/publicati...STerrorism.pdf

[zz0468]

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

http://start.umd.edu/start/publicati...STerrorism.pdf

So, you really didn't understand the meaning or purpose of that article, did you?

[kc0vgj]

Yes I know what it reads, In one term it means basicly everyone that does not like what the government is doing is a terroris, And in other words there wording it to be not directly saying it out loud.

So "Dominnated Organization is:

Religious Churches: So if you go to church = Go to jail.
Beleive in your rights = Go to jail
Right wing/Left wing = Go to jail.

Here a vidio from FEMA: FEMA Partners with Homeland Security on Psyops Campaign - YouTube!

its sad, Do you really think us americans are terroris? Come on... "Neighbors snitching on Neighbors" what happen to "Mayberry", "What happen to We The People", What happen to the American Pride and Repect to others? Theres two classes of people, CLASS 1: THE RICH - CLASS 2 NOT RICH.. If your class 1 you get respect, if your class 2 you get disrespected.

[kc0vgj]

heres another: Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians! - YouTube

[rdale]

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

Yes I know what it reads.

No, no you clearly do not.

[zz0468]

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

Yes I know what it reads, In one term it means basicly everyone that does not like what the government is doing is a terroris, And in other words there wording it to be not directly saying it out loud.

But that's not at all what it says.

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

Religious Churches: So if you go to church = Go to jail.
Beleive in your rights = Go to jail
Right wing/Left wing = Go to jail.

I doesn't say that, either. Where on earth do you people come up with these things???

[kc0vgj]

A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”

The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”

The center — part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”

The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.

But its latest study turns inward and paints a broad brush of people it considers “far right.”

It says anti-federalists “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”

The report also draws a link between the mainstream conservative movement and the violent “far right,” and describes liberals as “future oriented” and conservatives as living in the past.

“While liberal worldviews are future- or progressive -oriented, conservative perspectives are more past-oriented, and in general, are interested in preserving the status quo.” the report says. “The far right represents a more extreme version of conservatism, as its political vision is usually justified by the aspiration to restore or preserve values and practices that are part of the idealized historical heritage of the nation or ethnic community.”

The report adds: “While far-right groups’ ideology is designed to exclude minorities and foreigners, the liberal-democratic system is designed to emphasize civil rights, minority rights and the balance of power.”

The report says there were 350 “attacks initiated by far-right groups/individuals” in 2011.

Details about what makes an attack a “far right” action are not clear in the report, which was written by Arie Perliger, who directs the center’s terrorism studies and teaches social sciences at West Point.

A Republican congressional staffer who served in the military told The Washington Times: “If [the Defense Department] is looking for places to cut spending, this junk study is ground zero.

“Shouldn’t the Combating Terrorism Center be combating radical Islam around the globe instead of perpetuating the left’s myth that right-wingers are terrorists?” the staffer said. “The $64,000 dollar question is when will the Combating Terrorism Center publish their study on real left-wing terrorists like the Animal Liberation Front, Earth Liberation Front, and the Weather Underground?”



West Point center cites dangers of 'far right' in U.S. - Washington Times

[rdale]

Oh I think the far-right whackos are a threat to our society. Any attacks they make should be considered terrorist. So you're saying a right-winger blowing up a Federal office building in Oklahoma City is NOT a terrorist?

[kc0vgj]

there just not only right wingers but left too in another report.

here something els that sick is: Medical Journalists Calling for ‘After-Birth Abortions’, Say Infants ‘Aren’t People’ Read more: Medical Journalists Call for 'After-Birth Abortions'

[N1RGR]

Originally Posted by rdale

Oh I think the far-right whackos are a threat to our society.

I think far-left wing whackos are a threat to our liberty!

[rdale]

Both "far" sides are threats. Meet in the middle...

[rapidcharger]

Originally Posted by kc0vgj

So whats your opinion on obama's gun control speach?

Was that directed at me?

The whole debate is a big distraction. Theatrics. Just another way to perpetuate the "you suck, we rule" mentality that keeps the dumbed down public in the dark watching their respective infotainment networks with either the red or blue backdrops.

Whether Obama wants gun control or not is irrelevant. He's powerless to get any.

[kc0vgj]

well turn your guns to the irs and get more in your returns, Only time will tell what obama can or can't do. We will see soon.

[elk2370bruce]

Similarly, the NRA should not be telling us how to run our country. While they have loads of congressional leeches on their payroll and many of their members that do not agree with their most recent stance and commercial running on selective stations,, their own brand of extremism is equally reprehensive. This kind of lobby-based nonsense is a good part of the legislative gridlock that BOTH political parties are guilty of - to the detriment of the nation and its citizens.

[N1RGR]

Originally Posted by elk2370bruce

Similarly, the NRA should not be telling us how to run our country. While they have loads of congressional leeches on their payroll and many of their members that do not agree with their most recent stance and commercial running on selective stations,, their own brand of extremism is equally reprehensive. This kind of lobby-based nonsense is a good part of the legislative gridlock that BOTH political parties are guilty of - to the detriment of the nation and its citizens.

I respectfully disagree Bruce. If the NRA are the only ones fighting to protect our 2nd amendment rights then Im all for that kind of lobby! I support the NRA! The constitution should be protected at ALL cost! It is all we have that guarantees our freedom and liberty! The real enemy are those who wish to dispose of our rights as Americans! Never forget that Bruce...too many people gave their lives protecting those rights and NO man should take them away! Any threat to our constitution is a threat to our liberty!

[elk2370bruce]

I have not (nor will I ever) forgotten. Like many others of our generation, I spent my time in an unpopular conflict to protect those same rights and have the scars to prove it. You don't have to be dead to be a patriotic American. To imply otherwise is just insuIting to me and others who do not think the NRA's recent position is descended from heaven above. I do not advocate the dissolution of 2nd Amendment Rights either. What I object to is that it is too damned easy in a number of states to purchase a weapon without any review, application, or discharge papers from a mental institution - just a check, cash, or money order laid on the sales table with no questions asked. Just a smile and "ho, ho, thanks for your dough stranger." As a shooter of many years, I do not feel that the NRA represents the shooting public in their methods that are sometimes to the right of the militia movement. Even the mafia refuse to involve family members and kids (including Obama's) in their words or actions. That advertisement crossed the line! Control and accountability does not infringe on my rights - nor will I stand idly by. Just because they're looking for some (often miniscule) hook to hang their political hat on to placate their more extremist members and advertisers does not mean that they speak for the majority of their card-carrying members who are mostly non-politically motivated nor easily inflamed. In this day and age, rational thinking adults have the capability of expressing their views to protect their rights without the heavy hand of this lobby.