Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > Project 25 Technologies


Project 25 Technologies Discussion forum for the Project 25 Standard and its related technologies

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 09:30 AM
ac7xc's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 286
Send a message via AIM to ac7xc Send a message via Yahoo to ac7xc
Question Support for TDMA P25 Phase II

Does anyone know if the new TDMA P25 systems and frequencies can be monitored and if any scanner manufacturers will be able to support it? Here in Oregon the State is installing a Statewide TDMA system over the next few years so I'm just curious if the systems can be monitored in the future.
__________________
____________________
Best Regards, Keith http://home.comcast.net/~kilowattradio/
BCT15X PRO-106 PRO-92 PRO-83 TH-F6A FT897D BC346XT BC245XLT
Mac OS X, WIn7 & Linux
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 09:51 AM
Chauffeur6's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Metro NY
Posts: 679
Default

Currently, no.

In the future? I guess we'll have to wait and see. Phase II is going to become very popular in short order on these P25 systems, so you can bet the scanner manufacturers will want to incorporate the capability into their digital models. How soon, or even if, that becomes reality is the obvious question.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 11:19 AM
greenthumb's Avatar
Colorado DB Administrator
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 875
Default

If the current date for 700 MHz 6.25 kHz equivalent bandwidth sticks, more of these phase II TDMA systems should be showing up in the next few years on 700 MHz as users transition away from their 12.5 kHz bandwidth voice systems. Personally, unless there are substantial RF filtering improvements that don't skyrocket the price or new feature enhancements made to today's line of scanners, I won't be purchasing anything new until they add the ability to decode phase II, or put the hardware in the radio and promise a no-cost firmware upgrade to do it. I see no reason that these systems won't have the capability to be scanned since the TDMA protocol will be part of the P25 standards, thus replicable. Hopefully the scanner manufacturers will stay ahead of the technology this time instead of being several steps behind (e.g. trunking, P25 and 700 MHz).
__________________
Colorado Database Administrator
Forums Moderator
Rules and guidelines for forum post content

Last edited by greenthumb; 10-25-2009 at 11:22 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 08:57 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenthumb View Post
Hopefully the scanner manufacturers will stay ahead of the technology this time instead of being several steps behind (e.g. trunking, P25 and 700 MHz).
I'm betting they may be able to work up the basic functions in the scanner but until they can test on live systems the scanner makers won't have anything ready to release right away. Anyone ever heard of the possibility of the radio system manufacturers letting the scanner manufacturers play with new stuff being developed? That would be nice but unless that ever comes into being we'll always have to wait for the scanners to catch up.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:03 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

You also have to wait for a market to develop.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:12 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
You also have to wait for a market to develop.
True. I'd be curious as to when/how fast that market would develop. How many people would be in the stores within a few days to a week or three of discovering that newly licensed frequencies were active with a new type of system. There seems to be persons ready to get their hands on the scanners as soon as they hit the stores - especially in the current environment of the scanner manufacturers being able to update how their product works out in the real world.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:19 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

But the first Phase 2 systems won't be on the air for about a year.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:36 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
But the first Phase 2 systems won't be on the air for about a year.
Makes me glad I'm not the one that's intently gazing into a crystal ball trying to figure out when to get serious about meeting the demand of a future market. Scanner buyers won't be happy with anything released later than the day after someone finds activity on a frequency. (And it needs to work flawlessly right out of the box too.)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 09:48 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Part of the fun of being a Product Manager.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 10:00 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
Part of the fun of being a Product Manager.
They can keep the fun, I'll keep my hair and sanity.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 10:11 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 377
Default Hmmm..

Is TDMA a requirement for P25 Phase 2? The last time I read something on phase 2 it only mentioned using a narrower bandwidth - 6.26KHz to comply with the 2013 narrowbanding rules. I didn't see anything about having to be TDMA. Now I may be behind the times, but isn't TDMA an old technolgy, a modulation format, that cell companies got away from because of technical limitations?
A new wide area P25 system going up in my area on 700MHz and they are using 6.25MHZ width with LSM.
Also, if TDMA were a requirement, wouldn't it be an open format that reciever manufacturers could adopt for the open market using P25?
BG..
__________________
ButchGone
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 10:30 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchGone View Post
Is TDMA a requirement for P25 Phase 2? The last time I read something on phase 2 it only mentioned using a narrower bandwidth - 6.26KHz to comply with the 2013 narrowbanding rules. I didn't see anything about having to be TDMA. Now I may be behind the times, but isn't TDMA an old technolgy, a modulation format, that cell companies got away from because of technical limitations?
A new wide area P25 system going up in my area on 700MHz and they are using 6.25MHZ width with LSM.
Also, if TDMA were a requirement, wouldn't it be an open format that reciever manufacturers could adopt for the open market using P25?
BG..
My memory is rusty - at one point you were correct - just had to be narrower than 6.26. 2 TDMA channels per frequency was one discussion, cutting down somehow on the modulation bandwidth and staying exclusively FDMA per frequency was another.

TDMA is still out there, not just in older cellular systems. TETRA uses it I think.

I don't recall off the top of my head what LSM's modulation measures out as but at this point I think that the portable/mobile radios all talk inward using C4FM.

Anyone out there who's memory is more shiny than mine?
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-25-2009, 11:23 PM
greenthumb's Avatar
Colorado DB Administrator
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 875
Default

I don't think anyone has cracked the secret to reliable public safety grade digital voice communications using a single FDMA channel at 6.25 kHz. The big players (Motorola and Harris) are intending to sell 6.25 kHz equivalent systems to comply with the 700 MHz mandate using P25 phase II (or a close, proprietary knock off of it) which is TDMA over a 12.5 kHz channel.

If the current deadline holds, the market for these systems will grow quickly, or 700 MHz won't be used.
__________________
Colorado Database Administrator
Forums Moderator
Rules and guidelines for forum post content
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 05:30 AM
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wlmr View Post
. . . TDMA is still out there, not just in older cellular systems. TETRA uses it I think.
TETRA is 4 slot TDMA in 25kHz bandwidth.
MOTOTRBO is 2 slot TDMA in 12.5kHz bandwidth
Digital Mobile Radio (DMR) Tier III, a recent European Standard, is 2 slot TDMA in 12.5kHz bandwidth.

--
Comint
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 06:45 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

There are lots of TDMA systems (and they are all significantly different)
It is neither an "OLD" nor a "NEW" technology, no more than saying "Cellular" or "trunking" is "old' or "new".


P25 Phase 2 is 2 slot TDMA.

There is a standard for 6.25 kHz FDMA but no one has yet, and no one seem eager to implement it. So if you think someone is implementing it, you are mistaken.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2009, 08:03 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mineral Wells TX
Posts: 1,529
Default

GSM is also TDMA
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 10:29 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 377
Default

Well the new 700Mhz system being installed in Tennessee uses 6.25KHz bandwidth and it's totally monitorable with a 396. I was told they are phase 2 compliant and use LSM. There are no plans to run TDMA on this. That's why I was questioning whether phase 2 had to use TDMA, thinking that TDMA COULD be used if someone wanted. I still have not found any literature showing TDMA has been mandated since other technologies work fine in 6.25KHz slots.
BG..
__________________
ButchGone
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 12:41 AM
Seņor Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,429
Default

The TDMA spec calls for a half-rate vocoder. The manufacturers will have to re-license the code to do this from DVSI.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 07:39 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchGone View Post
Well the new 700Mhz system being installed in Tennessee uses 6.25KHz bandwidth and it's totally monitorable with a 396.
Someone is mistaken.
It can not be since there is no such system from any manufacturer.
The fact the 396 monitors it confirms it is P25 Phase 1 (12.5 kHz, 9600 BPS, etc.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchGone View Post
I was told they are phase 2 compliant and use LSM.
To quote Marty Feldman "You were told wrong."

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchGone View Post
There are no plans to run TDMA on this.
Acording to? (Not doubting, just confused)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButchGone View Post
That's why I was questioning whether phase 2 had to use TDMA, thinking that TDMA COULD be used if someone wanted. I still have not found any literature showing TDMA has been mandated since other technologies work fine in 6.25KHz slots.
Hence how believing a few incorrect "facts" causes you to misunderstand others.

As said;
1) P25 Phase 2 "IS" TDMA for all practical purposes.
2) P25 Phase 2 is the only 6.25e (6.25 kHz equivalent) system currently in the standards and planned for production.
3) 6.25 kHz FDMA is in the standards but not being built by anyone.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2009, 07:40 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitrunker View Post
The TDMA spec calls for a half-rate vocoder.
True

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unitrunker View Post
The manufacturers will have to re-license the code to do this from DVSI.
Based on??
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions