Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > Project 25 Technologies


Project 25 Technologies Discussion forum for the Project 25 Standard and its related technologies

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2007, 08:20 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 600
Default 700 MHz being rebanded

As if the rebanding fiasco with 800 MHz wasn't bad enough, the band plan for public safety frequencies in the 700 MHz band has been changed. See the PDF document linked to below and scroll down to pages 7 through 9.

http://siec.louisiana.gov/metadot/in...on&op=download

I hope that scanner manufacturers will offer a flash upgrade to deal with this issue as the channel number assignments used to do control channel only trunking will change.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-13-2007, 10:15 PM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

Just to avoid any confusion -

The change on 700 MHz is not "rebanding." That term refers to the Sprint-Nextel proceedings on 800 MHz and does not affect 700 at all.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2007, 07:41 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNF2G
Just to avoid any confusion -

The change on 700 MHz is not "rebanding." That term refers to the Sprint-Nextel proceedings on 800 MHz and does not affect 700 at all.

Yes and No!

NO: Sprint/Nextel/800 MHz rebanding has NOTHING to do with 700 MHz, Cellular, Digital TV, or any of the other things people have mistakenly connected it to.

YES; the 700 MHz public safety band is being "Rebanded" to create a band plan suitable for the "Public Safety Spectrum Trust Corporation" (now renamed), to build a system on.

There are few 700 MHz deployments so it should not be a big issue compared to the 800 MHz fiasco.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2007, 04:53 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 600
Default

My concerns are these:

1- Control channel only scanning will point the scanner to the wrong voice frequency after rebanding.

2- The public safety voice channels will start at 763 instead of 764 so that you will not be able to trunktrack any tower that uses a control channel from 763 to 764 because currently scanners start at 764.

3- Currently there is a gap in scanner coverage in the upper 760's and lower 770's which is now used for broadband. Part of this area will be rebanded to voice and the broadband frequencies moved up so that all voice is contiguous and all broadband is contiguous so as not to interfere with each other. This will create another scanner coverage gap.

The scanner manufacturers need to address this issue just. Hopefully it is just as easy as a flash upgrade to make the scanner tune the correct frequencies. That is, unless, there is a more sophistocated blocking method in place on these frequencies like the way they block cellular in the 800 band. If that is the case then everyone in an area which will predominantly be 700, like about 90% of all public safety agencies in the state of LA over the next few years, will be screwed.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 01:57 AM
kevins669's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 384
Default

I guess we will see how versatile "firmware updates" really are.

I sure hope they work to our advantage. If a scanner manufacturer took care of me with an investment I made with them, I would still be one of the first in line to buy a new model when one is released.

On the other hand, I would be very upset if my firmware-updateable radio could not be updated for something like this.


-- Kevin
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 02:06 AM
mancow's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,533
Default

I still say the end is near. (ok maybe not near but well on its way)

There will soon be the day when PS comms are indistinguishable from cellular to an end user. The system/systems will all be privately owned and leased by agencies. They will be proprietary and encrypted and interoperable (ie: nextel in concept).

It only makes sense.

You will look back and tell people "I could hear the California highway patrol from Kansas" and people will think that's just insane.

Last edited by mancow; 12-15-2007 at 02:09 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 12:35 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 600
Default

I sent an email to GRE and received a quick reply. They assured me that the hardware is capable of receiving the upper 760/lower770 gap that now exists. I interpreted that to mean that there is not a hardware based lockout of these frequencies like the one that blocks out 800 cellular. They said that they anticipate having a firmware upgrade available before the first 700 systems get rebanded.

I have got to say that GRE is one of the most pleasant to deal with companies as far as customer service goes. I have asked them questions by email a couple of times and both times the responded in a prompt and pleasant manner without the usual canned B.S. that many companies give you. I tried to send a nice thank you email each time but their answer came from a noreply email address.

So with that said I think that we can put this thread to bed.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 09:02 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 478
Default Get the thread out of bed :)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landman
I sent an email to GRE and received a quick reply. They assured me that the hardware is capable of receiving the upper 760/lower770 gap that now exists. I interpreted that to mean that there is not a hardware based lockout of these frequencies like the one that blocks out 800 cellular. They said that they anticipate having a firmware upgrade available before the first 700 systems get rebanded.

I have got to say that GRE is one of the most pleasant to deal with companies as far as customer service goes. I have asked them questions by email a couple of times and both times the responded in a prompt and pleasant manner without the usual canned B.S. that many companies give you. I tried to send a nice thank you email each time but their answer came from a noreply email address.

So with that said I think that we can put this thread to bed.
Yes, it is very true that IF the radio transmissions on 700 are the type your GPE recieves now, then you most certainly will be able to hear them.

But what will be the mode of transmission on 700 mhz?
I keep reading about 700 mhz being earmarked as a nationwide spread sprectrum public safety network.
What's that all about?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2007, 11:19 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyandotte
Yes, it is very true that IF the radio transmissions on 700 are the type your GPE recieves now, then you most certainly will be able to hear them.

But what will be the mode of transmission on 700 mhz?
I keep reading about 700 mhz being earmarked as a nationwide spread sprectrum public safety network.
What's that all about?
Parts, Yes!

Parts, No!

Keep reading!
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-17-2007, 01:45 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 427
Default

And hey who said anything about spread spectrum? It all depends on the D-Block. Leading contenders TODAY are EVDO-RevA. LTE and WiMax. That could change, and probably will, tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:04 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: mn
Posts: 11
Send a message via Skype™ to k8ble
Default

Anyone Heard That The Gov Is Going To Buy Nextel???? Because They Won't Move Freq's Around ???
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 08:34 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,224
Send a message via AIM to KS4VT
Default

NEXTEL is not a seperate company to buy. They are owned by Sprint, hence the new name Sprint/NEXTEL.

Will the gov't buy the infrastructure, doubt it. They have no need to buy a proprietary technology (iDEN) system along with all of the other headaches that go along with system ownership.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RS 800MHz antenna on BCD396T for 700MHz trunked systems? somery Antennas and Coax Forum 12 03-28-2007 04:12 PM
Pocono Mtn Schools brey1234 Pennsylvania Radio Discussion Forum 4 01-21-2007 01:31 PM
Rebanding Coming For 700 MHz n4voxgill General Scanning Forum 7 10-29-2006 11:12 AM
MPT system in Mohegan Sun Casino Unitrunker Connecticut Radio Discussion Forum 11 07-09-2006 10:11 PM
vhf/uhf landonjensen General Scanning Forum 3 07-06-2006 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions