Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > Project 25 Technologies


Project 25 Technologies Discussion forum for the Project 25 Standard and its related technologies

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2008, 10:07 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berlin, NJ
Posts: 771
Cool Digital radio question

Just curious. If two units key up simultaneously on a digital system frequency or system, what will happen. I know on an analog system the two units usually make a buzzing noise and cut each other out.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:12 AM
wayne_h's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,619
Send a message via AIM to wayne_h
Default

It disrupts the audio, just as with analog, and you hear what sounds like someone on the fringe of coverage. It's just chirps and bleeps.
__________________
-Wayne
Please contact me via email for a faster response.
Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:05 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 581
Default

Or,

If two ditial radios are transmitting at the same time and a third is receiving the third may not hear anything at all if the received signal's bitstream is not able to be decoded.

This happened at FDNY when they first deployed the XTS3500's programmed for digital fireground. They since went to analog.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:22 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

You will get anything from some reduction in the voice quality of the stronger signal to complete cancellation.

Trunking systems usually don't allow doubling.
Conventional systems do. Some radios can be programmed to prevent it.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 05:40 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,794
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay
Trunking systems usually don't allow doubling.
You haven't tried LTR or PassPort...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:04 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 347
Default

Unsure if the most recent radio programming software still allows these choices - your milage may vary.

On a Motorola 9600 P25 system if the radios are programmed for transmission trunking they ask the control channel for permission to talk each time before keying up. If another radio is talking they're told to wait. This is done for every transmission (hence transmission trunking ). No keying over each other.

If the radios are programmed for message trunking, only the first radio has to ask. All subsequent radios just continue the message on the voice channel as long as they key up before the system times out the conversation. They can cause headaches amongst themselves as described in earlier posts if(when) multiple radios try to talk at the same time.

The final setting which allows important talkgroups to keep a message going (and prevents multiple radios from keying at the same time) is called message trunking with PTT ID. The message stays up but as subsequent radios try to key up they have to check with the system via control channel to see if it's ok to do so. (Back to one at a time - no keying over each other.)

Again as earlier posts have stated, if the radios aren't using a trunked system and/or programmed to avoid keying over each other, they can cause all kinds of problems.

One radio = one digital stream to reconstitute back into audio. More than one = difficult to impossible hear anything that resembles voice if they're both able to be received.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 04:17 AM
SLWilson's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via MSN to SLWilson Send a message via Yahoo to SLWilson
Default Programming?

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay
You will get anything from some reduction in the voice quality of the stronger signal to complete cancellation.

Trunking systems usually don't allow doubling.
Conventional systems do. Some radios can be programmed to prevent it.
Not sure if it is the "Programming" or what, but on the Ohio MARCS system, two radios will NOT key at the same instance. If one radio is "on the air" and another one tries to key, the second operator gets a BONK noise out of their radio.

I'm assuming if BOTH tried to key at the same time, one would be just a "little" quicker on the key & block the other one and get bonked.

Additionally, if you try to key while another radio is talking on your TG, when THEY stop, you get an alert to let you know the channel is NOW clear for you to use....

I'm sure that the actual patrol post dispatchers can "override" the bonk out feature, but, I'll have to ask to be sure...

Steve/KB8FAR
__________________
[B][COLOR="Navy"]I have my time in. Gonna stick around to see what happens next though !
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 07:02 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slicerwizard
You haven't tried LTR or PassPort...
Usually does not mean all,
and,
the conversation started discussing "digital", and there is not a digital variant of LTR,
and,
I don't recommend LTR for public safety,
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 05:50 PM
wlmr's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLWilson
I'm sure that the actual patrol post dispatchers can "override" the bonk out feature, but, I'll have to ask to be sure...
Steve/KB8FAR
Most likely varies with the system. On at least one 9600 P25 system if a radio is talking & dispatcher has important traffic they just key up and their voice replaces the field unit. They never get bonked. Dispatch Unkeys and if the unit is still happily talking the talkgroup audio goes back to him. (While the dispatcher is talking the dispatcher continues to hear the original field unit's audio - kinda a safety feature in case what the field unit is saying becomes important.)

I realize this info is rather far afield from the original two digital radios keying at the same time discussion so I'll cut it short with the above info.

Last edited by wlmr; 01-11-2008 at 05:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 08:32 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Berlin, NJ
Posts: 771
Cool

Thanks for all the input. True, silly me didn't think about the fact that a trunking system has multiple frequencies...although I guess two units could be trying to communicate on the same talkgroup and I bet that can cause some confusion!! {:>0
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:57 PM
zerg901's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 635
Default

Actually policefreak, I think you have stumbled onto something very profound. If a TRS could be set up to allow 2 field units (on the same talkgroup) to talk at the same time, that might be a very, very, very, useful feature.

Think of any intense foot chase or shootout that you have ever heard. Instead of 4 people doubling all over each other, imagine how much better it would be if everyone could be heard at the same time. (Instead of the "Tower of Static or Bonks" you would have the "Tower of Babble".)

Of course the very best system would have fully duplex field radios - radios that can receive and transmit at the same time. Like my $5 cellphone.

Peter Sz
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:43 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerg901
Actually policefreak, I think you have stumbled onto something very profound. If a TRS could be set up to allow 2 field units (on the same talkgroup) to talk at the same time, that might be a very, very, very, useful feature.
No, it would just result in nobody hearing anything with the dual conversations, and the 2 field units transmitting wouldn't have any idea that everybody else missed out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by policefreak
although I guess two units could be trying to communicate on the same talkgroup and I bet that can cause some confusion!
No... As noted above, a trunked system will 'bonk' one of the users - conventional is the only place where this could happen.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 03:00 PM
zerg901's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 635
Default

Perhaps I wasnt as 'clear' as I meant to be. (pun intended)

I am talking about putting a 2nd input freq into play when a double is about to occur. Field Unit 1 would transmit on Freq A - Field Unit 2 would transmit on Freq B - the infrastructure would allow everyone on the TG to hear both messages.

Peter sz
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2008, 03:03 PM
JoeyC's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerg901
- radios that can receive and transmit at the same time. Like my $5 cellphone.

Peter Sz
Cellphones I've used do a poor job at full duplex where digital is concerned. That is especially true when 2 cellphones (digital) are talking to each other.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 10:36 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 7,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zerg901
I am talking about putting a 2nd input freq into play when a double is about to occur. Field Unit 1 would transmit on Freq A - Field Unit 2 would transmit on Freq B - the infrastructure would allow everyone on the TG to hear both messages.
I understand what you are saying... Realize though that in a pursuit, adrenaline is up, so voices are louder. Imagine two people with higher volume voices talking at the same time to you. Can you pick out exactly (or even closely?) what each are saying? Now put those same loud voices in a small speaker and hold it to your ear. No value...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 11:15 AM
Astro25's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 732
Default

Both signals usually end up muting, with some choppy audio inbetween. If your radio is capable of displaying IMBE numerical IDs and SoftIDs, you'll see each radio's respective ID popping up and flickering as well. Not much else. All depends how close they are to the receiving site of the system as well.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 11:45 AM
zerg901's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Arlington MA
Posts: 635
Default

Rdale - I think we will have to agree to disagree on your point. Maybe a pilot project is in order.

I saw a recent post on the Net from St Charles MO. Apparently their P25 system is set up to accomadate 'doubles' if someone holds their mike button for a longer period of time. It seemed to be some little known Motorola configuration. I can probably find the post if anyone cares.

Peter Sz
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:28 PM
REDave's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Metro Area MN
Posts: 55
Thumbs up

WLMR's Posts are correct.

Excellent Posts!!
__________________
Encryption. It is a very excellent tool indeed.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:28 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: PA/MD
Posts: 522
Default

A trunked radio system uses repeaters. Repeaters use two frequencies; one is an input, one is the output. Dispatchers are typically connected directly to the repeater or base station, so they are monitoring the input and transmitting on the output. This immediately builds in two safety features, as stated about.
1. If the dispatcher is transmitting (on the output) and a field unit keys up (on the input), the dispatcher can hear this call coming in, and, if it's emergent, can stop transmitting and monitor the new call.
2. If a field unit is transmitting (on input, repeated on output), and the dispatcher needs to air a more urgent call, he need only key up and take over the output, and all field units (with the exception of the one transmitting) will hear the call. The dispatcher will continue to be able to monitor the incoming call.

As far as two inputs, what!? I mean, I understand the idea, but why? Which input would be chosen for the repeater-out? Which would be heard in the dispatcher's ear? One in the ear, one in the unselect speaker? Why not just switch talk groups? Or if it's a true emergency, push the emergency button and overtake the voice channel. Two inputs seems silly, and defeats the purpose of a group call.

Zerg, I'm sure the config you speak of refers to that second radio being "regrouped" and permitting the call so that someone will hear it. Two inputs into one talk groups seems unlikely. How would the system mix the voice? Which call would be repeater?
__________________
Matt
"If the tallest building in your county is a grain silo, you DON'T need 800mhz!"

Last edited by ocguard; 01-22-2008 at 08:31 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-27-2008, 06:20 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLWilson
Not sure if it is the "Programming" or what, but on the Ohio MARCS system, two radios will NOT key at the same instance. If one radio is "on the air" and another one tries to key, the second operator gets a BONK noise out of their radio.

I'm assuming if BOTH tried to key at the same time, one would be just a "little" quicker on the key & block the other one and get bonked.

Additionally, if you try to key while another radio is talking on your TG, when THEY stop, you get an alert to let you know the channel is NOW clear for you to use....

I'm sure that the actual patrol post dispatchers can "override" the bonk out feature, but, I'll have to ask to be sure...

Steve/KB8FAR

Don't have my system manuals in front of me, however you're correct.

On a 9600 P25 (6.x/7.x) Motorola system, there IS a parameter you can
toggle in UCM that will allow/disallow preemption of a talkgroup by a subscriber.
In other words if you key up on a particular TG in use, you will get a "bonk" on
your radio (IF that parameter is set to disallow preemption).

Console priority is standard on all Moto systems. So dispatcher will ALWAYS
be able to override a field unit.

Re: description if both keyed up simultaneously, one quicker than other.
It wouldn't matter, "recent user priority" would favor the last user in the
conversation that was going on. Again this is another parameter that
can be fine tuned if needed. However, it's best left alone with the factory
defaults unless you understand what you're doing.

Re: the "alert", is simply a talk permit tone, for in inbound PTT that was
in queue. subscriber now has channel grant and is clear to send voice.

-----------------------------------------------------

"you are an enemy of de peeple ! you weel be geevin a fair
trial, and then you weel be shot !"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motorola & RCC Mobile Radio Systems Provide TETRA Digital Radio Solutions for St. ... ki4wkm Europe Radio Discussion Forum 3 02-27-2008 01:07 AM
Radio System troubles exkalibur Trunking Forum 33 11-05-2007 08:18 AM
Common Fed Freqs mike_s104 Federal Monitoring Forum 63 04-23-2007 11:39 AM
Icom Dstar will not work on analog repeater Hamradiostuffing ICOM Receivers 47 01-21-2007 08:50 PM
***FOR SALE*** 800MHZ GCWE2004 Old Classifieds Archives 1 06-26-2004 10:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions