Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners and Receivers Forums > Radio Shack Scanners


Radio Shack Scanners A forum for the discussion of all Radio Shack scanning radios and receivers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 02:01 PM
racin06's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westfield, Indiana
Posts: 542
Default Convince me to sell my 396T and buy the Pro-106

Well, the city of Indianapolis now has an P25 simulcast system. My Uniden 396T pretty much sucks when trying to monitor the P25 system. Even my Pro-2096 does a much better job of monitoring the P25 system. So, besides being able to monitor P25 systems well, what other features would you give the 106 an anvantage over the 396T?
__________________
KC9IPP

Radio Shack Pro-2096
Uniden BCD396T
Icom 91AD 2m/70cm HT w/D-STAR
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 08:17 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 274
Default Convince me to sell my 396T and buy the Pro-106

NAC codes, if that interests you in the least.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 09:28 PM
buddrousa's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NW Tenn
Posts: 154
Default

Other than the NAC codes for non trunked systems the price when it was at 299.00 when you could get 2 for the price of 1 396 no main reason the 197/106 hears the P25 the same as your 2096/96 I just have a use for NAC because of TN game wardens and KSP plus I like the building of my custom banks and fav other than that my 2096 and my 96 and 785d serve me just fine.
__________________
Support your local FIRE & EMS the life you save may be your own.
ACT-10 ; M-400 ; BC100 ; HX-1000 ; 8500XLT ; PRO-67 ;
PRO-93 ; 785d ; PRO-96 ; PRO-2096 ; PRO-163 ; PRO-197 ; PRO-106
Buddy
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 10:24 PM
walter900's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by racin06 View Post
Well, the city of Indianapolis now has an P25 simulcast system. My Uniden 396T pretty much sucks when trying to monitor the P25 system. Even my Pro-2096 does a much better job of monitoring the P25 system. So, besides being able to monitor P25 systems well, what other features would you give the 106 an anvantage over the 396T?


Just watch this, gotta love the assignable LED, beautiful looks, and great operation, nuf said;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo4a2rVbG-A
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 11:15 PM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
   
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The innards of the 28F640W18BD60
Posts: 106
Default

Way better Digital AGC than the 396 Makes a world of difference if the people running your local PS trunk are fools who don't read Motorola's technical briefs.

- Selectable/programmable/adjustable per-talkgroup delay.
- You don't have to mess with "quality" settings like the inferior Uniden scanners.
- GRE's engineers don't need 4 years to figure out how to eliminate "machine gunning" problems.
- BNC antenna connector instead of the annoying-as-hell SMA female found on the 396T.

There are many reasons to go GRE (or RS clone) over the Unidens. I was loyal to Uniden for years and purchased several of their digital scanners. They're all junk and Uniden's engineers have no clue how to solve the main issues. Instead of fix them, they'd rather release a new scanner with a "multicolor backlight" instead of adding real features.

GRE designed the PRO-2006. Enough said.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2008, 11:50 PM
N8IAA's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East of the Big Chiecken
Posts: 1,494
Thumbs up

Read my post in: Is it just me, pro-106 thread. Used to be a long time Uniden fan. Got hooked on the ease of use and superior scanning that the GRE scanners have.
Nuff said,
Larry
__________________
Pro-106, Pro-163, Pro-99, Lafayette 200A, ScanFare VHF 4Ch Xtal, FT-60R
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2008, 12:48 AM
ind224's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 287
Default

Well, I say go for it. After my 96 worked on this system with no problems at all I was excited to get a good deal on a used 600. But the P25 decode was buggered so I had to get a 106 on sale while I try to get GRE to fix the 600. Meanwhile, I rain checked another 106 Christmas Eve.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2008, 08:46 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Have_Teeth View Post
Way better Digital AGC than the 396 Makes a world of difference if the people running your local PS trunk are fools who don't read Motorola's technical briefs..
Using a Pro106 local SZ 4.1 system sounds much better running AGC off. Also a local PD (Astro conventional) sounded like crap with AGC on. You could hear background audio ramp up with AGC on. Had this problem in the past with a Pro96 I tested as well.

Uniden has better AGC in my opinion.

I do like some of the features exclusive to the 106.
Using programming cable as discriminator tap/slicer with UniTrunker.
Display conventional NAC codes
Ind ID display during trunking scanning.

Programming is different.
Uniden 396 allows groups in a system. For example, in my county there are 39 agencies. I can create a group for each agency and have the group alpha tag have the town's name.

On the 106 you can only name the scan list and conventional object. Not as flexible with alpha tagging. Also requires a lot more alpha tag editing on import from RR database.

Aside from that. I feel the 106 is a solid performer for the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2008, 11:25 AM
Completely Banned for the Greater Good
   
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The innards of the 28F640W18BD60
Posts: 106
Default

AGC use is very subjective. It should not be enabled if you're monitoring a system where the radios are properly programmed with recent firmware.

It's quite normal for background noise to "ramp up" when no one is talking, or when they're between words.

Enabling AGC on the scanner will add some distortion and produce louder, unnatural sounding audio. But it definitely addresses the problems encountered when trying to monitor Motorola radios with 1996-2002 firmware. And even if the radios do have recent firmware, they must be reprogrammed so the subscriber AGC function is activated. A lot of administrators are way too dense in the head to realize that.

Try monitoring a service using old firmware without AGC, where the user picks up the amplified desk mic (on an astro spectra base) and screams into the microphone. You'll be buying yourself a new speaker if your volume was cranked
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2008, 11:43 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,667
Default

Keep the uniden & buy the new one too; you won't get as much as you want when selling.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
where to buy a bcd 396t jlo Western Canada Radio Discussion Forum 1 09-26-2007 06:38 PM
396T - 2 years on tanger32au Uniden Scanners 0 08-16-2007 08:51 PM
Which One, Pro 96 Or Bct 396t jetblack3791 General Scanning Forum 19 06-26-2007 12:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions