I'm really starting to think that instead of a really hot front end as some are saying about the 197 and 106 that it's a problem of such a wide front end that there is no rejection of unwanted signals.
Time and time again on different threads the old pros have consistently out performed the newer pros. and when these comparisons come out it is always called an unfair test and that if you just do a lot of tweaking eventually you may get better reception. But they keep giving the new ones high marks.
Those guys have got to be tweaker geeks..........................
To me it just means results vary. Different people, different methods, different conditions, mean different results.
I have tested the 2096 on my local simulcast system and found that it was completely confused and was simply awful, the worst of all digital scanners I have tried. I am saying HORRIBLE.
Then, thank GOD I bought a BCD996 which blew it away and did a much much much better job on this simulcast P25 system.
Eventually, in side by side testing, I determined that the PSR-600 handled the system a little better than the Uniden, and it took over the PRWN monitoring post.
Time rolled on, and when the chance to test the new 197 vs. the 600 came along, I jumped, despite the fact that they are "the same radio" (actually different firmware and different DSP to me means they are not identical, but anyway...)....
Side by side, after hours of testing with various identical antenna setups, the 197 emerged the winner.
Now, if I weren't objective, I would have a pretty hardy laugh at anyone telling me that a 2096 is outperforming a 197, and would love to be present for the testing. And it might ruffle my feathers that some seem to imply that those of us giving the 197 good review simply need to take the rose colored glasses off and get real.
But I know very intelligent people with as many years using scanners as I have under the belt that have found that scanner xxxxx (you fill in the model number) works better in THEIR situation than scanners yyyyy or zzzzzz. And it is all over the board. There is no universal consensus, because conditions and methodology vary.
Is it likely / possible that a 2096 outperformed a 197? How about a 996 outperforming a 2096? Sure.
The same way a Prius can outperform a chevy truck for some people, and vice-versa for others. It's a question of conditions, and what one is trying to accomplish, and how they are trying to do so.
There is no one scanner that is superior to the others under all conditions.
.....Mileage may vary.....