RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > California Radio Discussion Forum > Sacramento Valley Area Discussion


Sacramento Valley Area Discussion Local area specific discussion for Sacramento County and its outlying areas such as San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:13 PM
Thunderbolt's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,140
Default Tait Radio to install Stanislaus County Project 25 system

Tait Radio Communications was chosen by Stanislaus County, Calif., to upgrade communications among the region's public-safety agencies. Tait's network solution will enhance the county's existing interoperability channel, expand radio coverage through difficult terrain, and replace aging equipment. The upgrade to Tait's system will also secure the primary radio tower and support the operational area's joint efforts to respond to all hazards as well as daily operations.

Implementation of the Project 25 (P25) digital network is scheduled to take place in phases, allowing for future improvements as needs arise. Stanislaus County is located in the Central Valley of California and includes the city of Modesto.
__________________
"A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain." Robert Frost.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:26 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,919
Send a message via AIM to WayneH
Default

Excellent, it's nice to see a different vendor used (and another manufacturer control channel to analyze).
__________________
-Wayne
wayne_h at radioreference dot com

Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007, 10:22 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne_h
Excellent, it's nice to see a different vendor used (and another manufacturer control channel to analyze).
If it is trunked, P25 is P25!

But P25 may not always be trunked.

Anyone try to find the bid specs?

EDIT:

Look at what a Google turned up!
--------------------
Tait Radio Communications' suite of P25 products will be implemented throughout the area, with all solutions being fully P25 compliant and digital, analog and mixed mode capable with the ability to interface with radio consoles and remotes.-
-------------------------

Mixed mode is obviously conventional.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post

Last edited by N_Jay; 05-10-2007 at 10:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 12:56 PM
trooperdude's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin

Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SFO Bay Area
Posts: 1,362
Default TaitNet

Press release says "TaitNet" system, which is a packet switched VoIp system that's APCO25 compliant.

TaitNet also has a trunking option which is "non proprietary" protocol.

Anybody know anything about the MPT 1327 standard ?

One wonders if the current scanners can track it.

More on TaitNet here:
[http://www.taitworld.com/main/index....onal-Networks]

More on the trunking network here:
[http://www.taitworld.com/main/index....onal-Networks]
__________________
http://www.firesafecouncil.org/
Be Fire Safe California !
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 01:01 PM
trooperdude's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin

Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SFO Bay Area
Posts: 1,362
Default mpt1327

Found this website

http://www.mpt1327-usa.org/
__________________
http://www.firesafecouncil.org/
Be Fire Safe California !
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 01:38 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,173
Default

MPT-1327 is not P25.
It does not carry P25 voice channels.
It looks like "Taitnet" is conventional.

As I pointed out before, if it is P25/Analog mixed mode, it HAS to be conventional.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 06:21 PM
trooperdude's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin

Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SFO Bay Area
Posts: 1,362
Default

Is that a Tait specific limitation, because it's not a limitation on Motorola trunk systems.
__________________
http://www.firesafecouncil.org/
Be Fire Safe California !
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 06:36 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trooperdude
Is that a Tait specific limitation, because it's not a limitation on Motorola trunk systems.
It is a specific limitation of P25 trunking systems.

Older Motorola systems use their Smartnet/Smartzone control channel (3600 bps) and can support both analog and P25 digital, as well as Old Astro and old DVP/DES.

P25 trunked systems, using the P25 control channel can not support analog operation.
They only support P25 in clear or secure.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:03 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,919
Send a message via AIM to WayneH
Default

Scratch that idea. I guess the switch to trunking isn't happening yet.

My remark was based on the use of specific manufacturer OSPs that are outside of the regular APCO-25 protocol. We know a good amount about Motorola's so having Tait in the picture should add some new stuff.

Here's a PDF from the County.
__________________
-Wayne
wayne_h at radioreference dot com

Forum Rules and Guidelines

Last edited by wayneh; 05-11-2007 at 10:11 PM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:43 PM
scootz's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Metro Portland, OR
Posts: 59
Default



MPT1327....

If they go to that they will be not liking it after a very short while. One of the agencies up in Oregon (Yamhill County) has a MPT trunked system and it has been plagued with issues ever since start up.

In fact, the law enforcement side are still using the radios, but as conventional only due to officer safety concerns and issues with the system.

In fact, 2 different consultations were done on the radio system and both consulting firms recommended getting rid of the current system and replacing it with a system that has more interoperability capability than the MPT system does.
__________________
Monitoring from the Northwest
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007, 09:01 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scootz


MPT1327....

If they go to that they will be not liking it after a very short while. One of the agencies up in Oregon (Yamhill County) has a MPT trunked system and it has been plagued with issues ever since start up.

In fact, the law enforcement side are still using the radios, but as conventional only due to officer safety concerns and issues with the system.

In fact, 2 different consultations were done on the radio system and both consulting firms recommended getting rid of the current system and replacing it with a system that has more interoperability capability than the MPT system does.
Since it will be P25, it will not be MPT1327.
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007, 07:34 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,919
Send a message via AIM to WayneH
Default

This is slowly heading toward some other forum. Lets stay Regional please.
__________________
-Wayne
wayne_h at radioreference dot com

Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2007, 08:49 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 10,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne_h
This is slowly heading toward some other forum. Lets stay Regional please.
Sorry, just correcting incorrect information so to prevent others from getting confused. (and without too much sarcasm, if I do say so myself!)
__________________
Some posts can be interpreted as either humorous or insulting
When not sure, always assume humorous
If you only find it insulting you have misunderstood my post or I have misunderstood your post
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-14-2007, 09:36 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Manager
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 5,919
Send a message via AIM to WayneH
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay
Sorry, just correcting incorrect information so to prevent others from getting confused. (and without too much sarcasm, if I do say so myself!)
I understand. I'm just trying to be preemptive. I'd rather not see us go off on an MPT tangent.
__________________
-Wayne
wayne_h at radioreference dot com

Forum Rules and Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2007, 06:00 AM
citylink_uk's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 206
Default

Just to clarify, TaitNet is a name used by Tait to describe a system solution (ie. Infrastructure, Repeaters, Radios...) using their products. This can be Conventional Analogue, P25, MPT.

P25 cannot be used over an MPT network. MPT systems do work well but in my experience not really intended for Public Safety use and has to be set up properly with fine tuning to work well.

As said before, I would imagine in this case the system to be P25 Conventional.

-
Rich
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2007, 09:35 PM
grant's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 326
Send a message via ICQ to grant
Default Stanislaus County

I have located the original source document for the proposed upgrade

http://www.co.stanislaus.ca.us/bos/a...060725/B07.pdf.

Essentially Stage 1 has already happened at a cost of $180,000 and includes existing TB9100 Tait P25 repeaters. I couldn't find the original stage 1 upgrade document. Stages 2 and 3 are contained in the document above.

Other relevant documents:

http://www.taitworld.com/main/index....ations-upgrade

http://www.taitworld.com/main/index....ation-Repeater


Grant

PS Although I am on the other side of the world I am personally familar with Modesto, having spent a week there back in February 1986 while being billeted for a church conference at First Baptist Church Modesto.
__________________
Eric Cartman: "I'm not fat; I'm just big-boned"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
42 new feed links and other updates to my site jasonpeoria911 Streaming / Broadcasting / Audio Recording 8 12-15-2009 08:00 PM
Sticky Thread for MilAir II TinEar Maryland Radio Discussion Forum 4098 01-01-2008 10:21 AM
Question RE: CHP rananthony04 California Radio Discussion Forum 33 07-27-2007 02:15 PM
Shootings hit on need for radio system scannerfreak Ohio Radio Discussion Forum 6 04-16-2007 08:10 AM
Need Info & Your Favorites 151-160 mHz TinEar Maryland Radio Discussion Forum 109 09-29-2006 06:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions