RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > U.S. Regional Radio Discussion Forums > California Radio Discussion Forum > San Francisco Bay Area Discussion


San Francisco Bay Area Discussion Local area specific discussion for the San Francisco Bay area including the North, East and South Bays.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2012, 9:25 AM
kgowen44's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 21
Send a message via ICQ to kgowen44 Send a message via AIM to kgowen44
Default Oakland Fire

Hello..

I am wondering if anyone is aware of any changes to Oakland fire recently. I was recently in the area and noticed that I was unable to receive any Oakland fire tramsmissions, where as, I was able to search and find many other transmissions in their system. Everything is programmed correctly as per the database, on two seperate scanners, a BCT 15 and BC 296D handheld. Have they gone completely digital? I do not see anything in these forums or the data indicating that. Thanks in advance for any help you may have.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2012, 12:00 PM
kma371's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 3,124
Default

Which Oakland system are you listening to? EDACS or P25?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2012, 12:01 PM
sffire's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SFO area
Posts: 128
Default

I have noticed some change. My analog scanners ( Radio Shack pro 162 and Uniden BC346XT) have not been receiving anything lately.
__________________
Bearcat BC250XLT, Uniden BC346XT, BCD396XT, Radio Shack Pro-136. 162
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2012, 1:48 AM
kgowen44's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 21
Send a message via ICQ to kgowen44 Send a message via AIM to kgowen44
Default

EDACS... If I search, I hear PD and other stuff fine, but just no fire
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2012, 2:10 AM
W8RMH's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,220
Default

This thread my help you out.
.
__________________
BCD396XT - BCT15X (Feeder) - BCT15 - Bearcat IV - Yaesu FT60R
Columbus Police Citywide Dispatch
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2012, 2:44 AM
kma371's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 3,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kgowen44 View Post
EDACS... If I search, I hear PD and other stuff fine, but just no fire
Fire is on the P25 system now I believe
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2012, 2:48 AM
kma371's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Joaquin County, CA
Posts: 3,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W8RMH View Post
Post 32 specifically.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2012, 5:50 AM
inigo88's Avatar
California DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,361
Default

Fire moved to the P25 system a LONG time ago. You're going to need to invest in a digital scanner, and then expect it to not work very well (due to Oakland's simulcast issues).
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-10-2012, 10:04 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Livermore, Ca
Posts: 472
Default re: oakland

Quote:
Originally Posted by inigo88 View Post
Fire moved to the P25 system a LONG time ago. You're going to need to invest in a digital scanner, and then expect it to not work very well (due to Oakland's simulcast issues).

It appears they completely stopped simulcasting on edacs over the weekend.
__________________
Thanks,
Ben
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2012, 11:27 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 254
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by inigo88 View Post
Fire moved to the P25 system a LONG time ago. You're going to need to invest in a digital scanner, and then expect it to not work very well (due to Oakland's simulcast issues).
Pretty sure you didn't quite mean it to sound like Oakland has issues with simulcast - rather, it's Uniden and GRE that are marketing and selling radios that they are fully aware cannot correctly decode simulcast P25 audio.

What the users of the system hear is nice and clean audio.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2012, 8:16 PM
inigo88's Avatar
California DB Admin
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sixtytwo View Post
What the users of the system hear is nice and clean audio.
Hehe well that's an awfully generous assessment. I don't suppose you work at the Oakland radio shop?

The first weeks and months following the P25 switch there were MAJOR complaints from officers across the board. I remember because I listened to them. Since the Gwin site was incorporated into the simulcast system (site 202) I believe things have gotten a lot better.

Here's a decent video on the new P25 system: NEW POLICE RADIOS IN OAKLAND - YouTube

But I agree that the root of the problem is scanner manufacturers selling a product marketed to do a job it doesn't do effectively, and essentially deceiving the consumer with false advertising. For a $500-$600 product, it's unforgivable.

Incidentally, if you did happen work there, maybe you could help us understand why site 303 - 852.1125 (licensed at Fire Station 28) is announced as a site neighbor, when no control channel is heard on that frequency. That's a mystery that we've been wondering about for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2012, 2:22 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 254
Default

Whoops - certainly didn't mean to imply I work anywhere around there, I don't.

What I should have typed is the word "typically" or "usually" or "normally" in front of my description.

I can confirm that Motorola P25 gear gives really good decoded audio on simulcast systems, including LSM.... why, I'm listening to such a system right now and it sounds very nice indeed.

Also, there is some work by the techs and engineers to get the simulcasting right, but I'm afraid the typical scanner listener wouldn't be able to notice given the lousy state of P25 scanners these days. You folks in the west have been dodging a bullet on this, those carefree days are coming to a close.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions