Thoughts on hidden, bumper mounted, wire dipole?

Status
Not open for further replies.

jparks29

John McClane
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
859
Location
Nakatomi Plaza
Looking at going low profile, only way I can think of doing that is with a wire dipole mounted behind the bumper...

Two problems I'm thinking of...

Vertical Vs. Horizontal polarization, easy 3-6db loss.... Reflection from metal bumper, which would be within about 2 inches from the antenna itself....

Looking @ vhf/uhf @ 110 watts...

Suggestions?
 

jim202

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,735
Location
New Orleans region
I guess the big question is just why would you want to do this? There has been a requirement
over the years to come up with some sort of covert or unseen antennas. These generally do
not perform very well and have poor range.

If your looking to just do this for no real reason, then have at it. If your looking to maintain
good communications and just don't like antennas sprouting from the roof of the vehicle,
that is a whole different prospective.

You will probably do better in obtaining suggestions, if you provided just a little more of a
hint on how you intend to use the antenna and what kind or range your expecting to obtain.

Jim



Looking at going low profile, only way I can think of doing that is with a wire dipole mounted behind the bumper...

Two problems I'm thinking of...

Vertical Vs. Horizontal polarization, easy 3-6db loss.... Reflection from metal bumper, which would be within about 2 inches from the antenna itself....

Looking @ vhf/uhf @ 110 watts...

Suggestions?
 

Fast1eddie

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
628
Location
Crafton Pennsylvania
Can you mount a unity gain antenna inside on the rear deck??? I am going to put one in my '07 Milan and have seen them in police cars. They work well, but can have directional and blocking tenencies due to shielding.
 

zz0468

QRT
Banned
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
6,034
Vertical Vs. Horizontal polarization, easy 3-6db loss....

Cross polarization losses are typically around 20 db.

Reflection from metal bumper, which would be within about 2 inches from the antenna itself....

Between cross polarization losses, and the effects of proximity to the bumper, it's a fair bet taht it won't work well, and probably lots of directions where it won't radiate at all.

Looking @ vhf/uhf @ 110 watts...

Suggestions?

That's a lot of power to waste...

Why don't you tell us what kind of car it is, so people can suggest better locations.
 

fineshot1

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
2,532
Location
NJ USA (Republic of NJ)
Looking at going low profile, only way I can think of doing that is with a wire dipole mounted behind the bumper...

Two problems I'm thinking of...

Vertical Vs. Horizontal polarization, easy 3-6db loss.... Reflection from metal bumper, which would be within about 2 inches from the antenna itself....

Looking @ vhf/uhf @ 110 watts...

Suggestions?

I installed one of these antennas once with very disapointing results for the owner
and he did not have a 110W radio. I think they are a gimmick/garbage and would not
recomend it especially with a 110W radio. Most stealth antennas are not rated for
110W and also for the reasons you stated above I would steer clear of them.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Check this site out that's a friend of mine:
Disguised undercover covert license plate antenna,fender,cowel,bumper antennas
The license plate antenna is a real compromise but if its for undercover work in a large public radio system that is designed to work well with hand helds, (voter receivers, etc) it should work ok. A friend installed one for general purpose amateur/GMRS use and it was very disappointing.

I've made and used simple 1/4 wave verticals from thin wire taped to a window with two ground radials along the lower window and it works surprisingly well but 110 watts inside a vehicle would be a health hazard.
prcguy


prcguy
 

radioman2001

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
2,974
Location
New York North Carolina and all points in between
I second the motion for the rear deck, I installed many an antenna on the rear shelf for the DEA in the 70's and 80's. To hide them a little better we would take a Kleenex box and put it over the antenna. Problems foreseen today are rear window defoggers, creates an electric field as if it were sheet metal. You could also install the whip by the A pillars in the front of the car, I also had installed what would be described as a curb feeler antenna. Worked sufficently for the Chief of the department who didn't want an antenna seen on his car. Stay away from cross polarization, keep the antenna verticle at the very least, where ever you mount it.
 

gewecke

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
7,452
Location
Illinois
Years ago I installed a quarter wave nmo on the rear package shelf of my 88 dodge diplomat. Uhf was 4" from left pillar nad vhf was 4" from the right. These worked quite well as this car did not have the rear defogger! The FBI favored this idea back then on many of their covert vehicles.
N9ZAS.
 

jparks29

John McClane
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
859
Location
Nakatomi Plaza
whip on rear deck is not good. the car creates a farraday cage, and pumps 110W into the back of my skull and goes through the defroster grid... BAD idea.

It'll be in a crown vic, stealth is a must. Can NOT use disguise fender mount antennas since they don't have any (except oddball '05 MY).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top