Cushcraft pc8910n

freqs · #1 (**permalink**) 07-25-2012, 10:02 PM

I haul dumpster's and I found a Cushcraft pc8910n Yagi .
I would like to use this Antenna for my Scanner I was told a Yagi may help on my Statewide System - MPSCS Simulicast .
Now the coax is only about 6 inch long and had the connector missing and one of the elements are missing .Could I still use this and would it work well ? Should I just put a end connector then run coax ?

Rt169Radio · #2 (**permalink**) 07-26-2012, 8:26 AM

Well put some coax on it and give it a try,you never know if it will work or not unless you try it.

freqs · #3 (**permalink**) 07-26-2012, 9:22 PM

What would be the best Coax to add on it .I will need about 25 30 feet ???

Rt169Radio · #4 (**permalink**) 07-27-2012, 8:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freqs

What would be the best Coax to add on it .I will need about 25 30 feet ???

Well if it is going to be that short,get some good RG-8 or RG-6 coax.

freqs · #5 (**permalink**) 10-07-2012, 10:34 AM

With rebanding will this Antenna still be usefull

Rt169Radio · #6 (**permalink**) 10-08-2012, 8:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freqs

With rebanding will this Antenna still be usefull

Do you mean narrowbanding? If so, the antenna will still be useful.

mule1075 · #7 (**permalink**) 10-08-2012, 7:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rt169Radio

Do you mean narrowbanding? If so, the antenna will still be useful.

Nope i am thinking he is worried about 800mhz REBANDING.Now to the matter at hand i looked at the specs on the model number you gave and it looks to me that it is a 900mhz antenna and the system you want to monitor is 800mhz will the antenna work maybe maybe not.Their are a bunch of guys on here that can give a more technical breakdown on if it can or if it will work.

freqs · #8 (**permalink**) 01-28-2013, 6:44 AM

Would there be a way to mod it to work for the 850 - 869 Mhz area .?

N5TWB · #9 (**permalink**) 01-28-2013, 2:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freqs

Would there be a way to mod it to work for the 850 - 869 Mhz area .?

In theory, that would require lengthening the elements and changing the element spacing. Simple calculations will show that the actual dimensions involved would be very small. Since the OP proposes to use it in a receive-only situation, it might be interesting to just find out how it will do in its current condition by hooking it up, pointing it toward a known site, and locking the scanner on a known control channel to see if it detects a signal.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained...