|
|
|
|
| Scanner / Receiver Antennas For discussion of any type of receiving antenna used by a scanner or receiver base, mobile or handheld. |

09-22-2012, 11:26 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,099
|
|
Is Using An SMA Male To SO239 Adapter On The HP-1 Risky?
I have been using the Uniden Home Patrol HP-1 for the past few months now and I am getting ready to get a mobile antenna for it. I am trying to decide if I want to get a mobile antenna that just terminates in an SMA connector or if I want to use one that has a PL259 and then use a SMA Male To SO239 Adapter. My concern is that the bigger PL259/SO239, since it is a bit bigger, might put the SMA connector on the Uniden HP-1 at greater risk of damage, since the PL259 is a bit bigger. In either case I may also use a 90 degree right angle adapter as well. Anyway, does anybody have any thought on this? I guess the other thought is, in an mobile installation, maybe the SMA would look slightly less noticeable, since it is smaller. And I suppose the fewer adapters the better when it comes to RF loss, etc.
|

09-22-2012, 12:02 PM
|
|
|
SMA to PL259
Use one of the adapters that have at least a couple of feet of coax in between the SMA part and the PL connector. This will relieve the weight being directly applied to the radio connector. The coax is usually a miniature variety and will put very little if any strain on the radio.
|

09-22-2012, 12:06 PM
|
|
|
deleted
Last edited by w1wra; 09-22-2012 at 12:17 PM..
|

09-22-2012, 12:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,647
|
|
If you use reasonable care in how you route and support the feed line there should be no extraordinary strain on anything. That adaptor will probably work just dandy. I'm surprised that the antenna maker doesn't offer an antenna with the proper connector.
- 'Doc
|

09-22-2012, 1:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 341
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LtDoc
If you use reasonable care in how you route and support the feed line there should be no extraordinary strain on anything. That adaptor will probably work just dandy. I'm surprised that the antenna maker doesn't offer an antenna with the proper connector.
- 'Doc
|
Second the info about being careful about the strain - I had to send my HP-1 in for repair - I transfer it frequently between house and car where I hook it up to a mobile antenna with BNC connector - apparently it did something to the connector as they had to replace it
|

09-22-2012, 2:00 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LtDoc
If you use reasonable care in how you route and support the feed line there should be no extraordinary strain on anything. That adaptor will probably work just dandy. I'm surprised that the antenna maker doesn't offer an antenna with the proper connector.
- 'Doc
|
While what you say is true, I can just see dropping, bumping or otherwise hitting the adapter.... It might work for you but us all thumbs people would be in bad shape..... 
__________________
K9WG - Greenfield Indiana USA
SkyWarn
ARES
|

09-22-2012, 2:11 PM
|
|
|
I second the suggestion of using a short jumper instead of a solid adapter. Let the short piece of coax handle all of the stress and strain of any movements and keep the scanner's connection safe.
|

09-22-2012, 5:23 PM
|
|
|
Short story about the SMA connector: Cute, small, etc., correct. However, it was not designed for the rigors of being continuously disconnected and connected on a scanner or any other radio. I read once that the MTBF (that means "how soon it will fail") is stated to be a few hundred cycles, which in the lifetime of a scanner or portable is not much at all. My advice for putting an aftermarket antenna on any radio would be NOT use any adapter but get an antenna with the correct SMA connector installed. If you're involved with an antenna feedline that has a PL259 termination make up an SO-239/SMA jumper coax to keep the strain off the radio's connector. A few bucks spent doing so may save you the expense of sending the unit back for service due to a broken SMA connection.
|

10-12-2012, 4:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,099
|
|
Is Using An SMA Male To SO239 Adapter On The HP-1 Risky?
I just happen to have a few antenna mounts at home and most of them have PL259 connectors on them. When I was more active in amateur radio, my amateur mobiles on 2 meters and 440 had SO239s on them. Have they switched that now, too, on mobiles? What is the difference in loss between a BNC and a PL259? I seem to recall that the N connector is less lossy, but less commonly found on equipment.
Last edited by JASII; 10-12-2012 at 4:27 PM..
Reason: Details
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|