RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Topic Specific Forums > Antennas and Associated Hardware > Scanner / Receiver Antennas

Scanner / Receiver Antennas For discussion of any type of receiving antenna used by a scanner or receiver base, mobile or handheld.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 8:30 AM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default R7100 antenna recommendations

As a novice I'm not sure which antenna would be the best choice for my newly inherited Icom IC-R7100 receiver. I like to listen to all of the bands and would like an antenna that would best accomplish that if possible. I'm sure everyone has their favorite antenna but I would like to hear from you guys that have been around the longest with the most experience.

Last edited by shortride; 01-14-2013 at 8:41 AM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 10:47 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,935
Default

Not enough data in your post to furnish a competent answer. Do you wish to listen to HF, VHF, UHF, etc.? For HF a multiband dipole would be ideal. Perhaps at this point the printed or online catalogs from the ham stores such as HRO or AES would give you the best view of what's currently available.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 11:32 AM
W9BU's Avatar
Lead Wiki Manager
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,119
Default

The frequency range of the IC-R7100 is 25-2000 MHz. Very few antennas cover that entire band with consistent effectiveness across that entire band. Diamond now has an "ultra-wideband" discone antenna, the D3000N, that they claim covers 25-3000 MHz, but it has essentially no gain. Their older discone, the D130J, covers 25-1300 MHz. There may be other discones out there worth considering--they will have an omni-directional pattern. You may also want to consider a log periodic antenna for the VHF-UHF bands as they will have some directivity.
__________________
Lead Wiki Administrator
Moderator for the Radio Reference Amateur Radio Forums.
"The whole world's living in a digital dream. It's not really there, it's all on the screen." -- Joe Walsh WB6ACU
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 5:43 PM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9RXR View Post
The frequency range of the IC-R7100 is 25-2000 MHz. Very few antennas cover that entire band with consistent effectiveness across that entire band. Diamond now has an "ultra-wideband" discone antenna, the D3000N, that they claim covers 25-3000 MHz, but it has essentially no gain. Their older discone, the D130J, covers 25-1300 MHz. There may be other discones out there worth considering--they will have an omni-directional pattern. You may also want to consider a log periodic antenna for the VHF-UHF bands as they will have some directivity.
If I understand what I'm reading isn't an antenna like the D3000N actually two antennas in one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by W2NJS View Post
Not enough data in your post to furnish a competent answer. Do you wish to listen to HF, VHF, UHF, etc.? For HF a multiband dipole would be ideal. Perhaps at this point the printed or online catalogs from the ham stores such as HRO or AES would give you the best view of what's currently available.
I would really like to listen to HF, VHF and UHF if that's possible. I can put up a wire antenna if I need to.

Last edited by shortride; 01-14-2013 at 5:47 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 7:24 PM
Wiki Admin Emeritus
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bowie, Md.
Posts: 16,369
Default

The R7100, as noted earlier, only goes down to 25 Mhz. That's a very small toehold in the HF world - and there really isn't too much, apart from hams, CB and a few IFBs in this range. I don't know of many broadcasters in the 25.5 - 26.1 Mhz range - although it's the wrong time of the year for it, at least for us in the Northern Hemisphere...

Mike
__________________
links editor, Utility Monitoring Central
HF Forum moderator, RadioReference
Friends don't let friends buy Scancat Lite Plus!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2013, 8:21 PM
W9BU's Avatar
Lead Wiki Manager
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortride View Post
If I understand what I'm reading isn't an antenna like the D3000N actually two antennas in one.
No, the disc and the cone are both elements of the same antenna.

The lower frequency of discone's range is determined by the length of the cone elements. That length then determines the diameter of the disc element. The nature of the discone is such that the high end of their range is roughly 10 times the low end of their range.

Several discone manufacturers, Diamond included, take the traditional discone design and add a center vertical element whose purpose is to lengthen the antenna to make it work at even lower frequencies than the basic design would allow.
__________________
Lead Wiki Administrator
Moderator for the Radio Reference Amateur Radio Forums.
"The whole world's living in a digital dream. It's not really there, it's all on the screen." -- Joe Walsh WB6ACU
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 5:56 AM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9RXR View Post
No, the disc and the cone are both elements of the same antenna.

The lower frequency of discone's range is determined by the length of the cone elements. That length then determines the diameter of the disc element. The nature of the discone is such that the high end of their range is roughly 10 times the low end of their range.

Several discone manufacturers, Diamond included, take the traditional discone design and add a center vertical element whose purpose is to lengthen the antenna to make it work at even lower frequencies than the basic design would allow.
Thanks, I appreciate the information.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2013, 10:28 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,771
Default

For most scanner type Discones the freq range of the Discone part is about 100MHz on the low end to about 800Mhz on the high end and they work very well from about 100Mhz to maybe 500MHz before the radiation pattern starts to point up from the horizon, so they are not that good on 800MHz. The whip on most of these is tuned sharply to 50Mhz to extend the low end but its not very good in the 25 to 45Mhz range or in the 55 to maybe 90Mhz range.

I have an IC-7100 buried somewhere in the garage, I should probably see if it still works.
prcguy
prcguy
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2013, 3:49 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cranbourne East,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 689
Default

Hi i use an Icom-AH7000 discone works excellent on all bands its been replaceby the AH8000 and this is a short video of my Icom-R7100 monitoring the airbands location melbourne radar controller in australia distance is around 80 km antenna is 10 metres high with Belden-9913 coax cable..

Airbands - YouTube

Regards Lino..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2013, 1:18 PM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Anyone know the diameter of the short mast that the D3000N elements mount on? I've looked at several website information and they don't mention the size. I'm trying to plan some sort of mounting apparatus to attach the antenna to a utility pole. 1-1/2" to 1-3/4" maybe?

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2013, 1:24 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 829
Default

http://www.diamondantenna.net/pdfdocs/D3000N.pdf

Applicable mast diameter (0.98" to 2.05")
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2013, 2:54 PM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Squad10 View Post
http://www.diamondantenna.net/pdfdocs/D3000N.pdf

Applicable mast diameter (0.98" to 2.05")
Thanks! That helped a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2013, 10:01 PM
k3cfc's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Beavertown Pa.
Posts: 584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortride View Post
As a novice I'm not sure which antenna would be the best choice for my newly inherited Icom IC-R7100 receiver. I like to listen to all of the bands and would like an antenna that would best accomplish that if possible. I'm sure everyone has their favorite antenna but I would like to hear from you guys that have been around the longest with the most experience.
You should try to get an hf ham radio even if it won't transmit all you want to do is listen anyway. then maybe you will look into getting a ticket and get into some fun. you could make a carolina windom antenna and listen to the world.

K3CFC
__________________
Don't confuse my personality with my attitude.
My personality is who I am.
My attitude depends on who you are.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 4:58 AM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by k3cfc View Post
You should try to get an HF ham radio even if it won't transmit all you want to do is listen anyway. Then maybe you will look into getting a ticket and get into some fun. You could make a Carolina Windom antenna and listen to the world.

K3CFC
A local amateur radio operator friend has been trying to talk me into getting a ticket for years. It would be expensive for me. I have a Grundig Sat 8 SW radio now and don't use it much. This Icom IC-R7100 receive was an inheritance and I thought it would be fun but it turning out to be a bit more difficult to learn than what I was expecting. Thanks for the suggestion.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 5:03 AM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

I received the D3000N antenna and the 100' roll of coax yesterday. Like a dummy I ordered RU-213-U coax and it is way bigger and heavier than what I needed. I should have ordered RG-8X.

Last edited by shortride; 01-18-2013 at 5:05 AM..
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 6:52 AM
W9BU's Avatar
Lead Wiki Manager
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,119
Default

Keep in mind that the attenuation in coaxial cable increases with the length of the cable. Additionally, different types of coax have different attenuation ratings. Generally, RG-213 has a better attenuation rating (that is, less attenuation) than RG-8X. Over a length of 100 feet, the difference in attenuation between those two types can be significant.

Coax attenuation also increases with frequency. In other words, a 450 MHz signal will have a harder time getting through a length of coax than a 150 MHz signal. So, given the improvement in attenuation of RG-213 over RG-8X and the 100 foot length that you bought, the RG-213 was probably a better decision on your part.
__________________
Lead Wiki Administrator
Moderator for the Radio Reference Amateur Radio Forums.
"The whole world's living in a digital dream. It's not really there, it's all on the screen." -- Joe Walsh WB6ACU
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 8:30 AM
shortride's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S.E. Oklahoma
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W9RXR View Post
Keep in mind that the attenuation in coaxial cable increases with the length of the cable. Additionally, different types of coax have different attenuation ratings. Generally, RG-213 has a better attenuation rating (that is, less attenuation) than RG-8X. Over a length of 100 feet, the difference in attenuation between those two types can be significant.

Coax attenuation also increases with frequency. In other words, a 450 MHz signal will have a harder time getting through a length of coax than a 150 MHz signal. So, given the improvement in attenuation of RG-213 over RG-8X and the 100 foot length that you bought, the RG-213 was probably a better decision on your part.
Does the 3’ incremental length of coax apply for a receiver only as it does with a transceiver? I was wondering if I have a fixed antenna height and distance from the antenna to the receiver, can I cut off any excess coax?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 8:41 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 829
Default

3' incremental length does not apply.

Yes, you can cut off the excess coax off. I always leave about an extra 15 feet in my monitoring room in case I want to change my receiver's location.

Be certain to get the coax connectors put on the coax so the coax center conductor and shield do not short.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2013, 9:36 AM
W9BU's Avatar
Lead Wiki Manager
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brownsburg, Indiana
Posts: 2,119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortride View Post
Does the 3’ incremental length of coax apply for a receiver only as it does with a transceiver?
Yes. The attenuation in an RF feedline applies to both received and transmitted signals. The attenuation is usually quoted in terms of dB of attenuation or loss per 100 feet. So, 3 feet of a a feedline rated at 6 dB/100 feet attenuation would have 0.18 dB of attenuation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shortride View Post
I was wondering if I have a fixed antenna height and distance from the antenna to the receiver, can I cut off any excess coax?
Yes, you can shorten the coax to suit your installation. But, make darn sure you know how to properly install a coax connector on the cut end.
__________________
Lead Wiki Administrator
Moderator for the Radio Reference Amateur Radio Forums.
"The whole world's living in a digital dream. It's not really there, it's all on the screen." -- Joe Walsh WB6ACU
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2013, 8:15 PM
k9rzz's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 2,677
Default

I would go with the discone for general listening, then if you got hot into monitoring one service, put up a special antenna for that. For example a 6 meter ham beam, 2 meter ham, or FM broadcast antenna. I even built up a stack of home brew beams for the NOAA weather stations on 162mhz. KILLER! :^) No reason you couldn't do the same for rail, air, lowband VHF, satellite, what have you. I also swapped out the 10.7mhz ceramic IF filter (~320khz) for a narrower Murata 110khz job and hooked it up to some Weingard 6065p antennas on the roof. Again, KILLER! The R7100 makes a nice DX rig for FM broadcast if you fix the wide bandwidth that it ships with. Enjoy!
__________________
Blog: The Daily DX Updated May 19th - VIDEO: 3310Khz Chochabamba, Bolivia

Last edited by k9rzz; 01-22-2013 at 8:25 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions