Russia to Restart Long Range Bomber flights near USA

Status
Not open for further replies.

MillerAirport1

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
37
Location
Toms River NJ
Did anyone see the article in USA today 11/13/14 about resumption of Russian Long Range Bomber Flights near USA near Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico. Any HF Frequencies to hear them on? I have recent article in The Spectrum Monitor on this issue, anything else out there. Airforces Magazine also has article tittle " The Bear is Back ".
 

bryan_herbert

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,134
Location
Las Vegas, NV. DM26jc
Hobbyists have been logging Russian freqs for years and there are DOZENS of them, Im only posting the most common ones logged from around the world.

Russian Air Force 'Tu-95 Bear Net'
Spring Schedule
8029 CW
8090 USB
8170 CW
Tu-95 Summer Schedule
8895 CW
8909 USB
Tu-95 Winter Schedule
8033 USB
8162 CW

I highly recommend subscribing to HFmonitors and UDXF on Yahoogroups and making the Numbers and Oddities Newsletters part of your regular reading routine.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Seen that also. Another cold war deal ahead of us over Ukraine? I have noticed more us fighter type air traffic present over the southern new mexico and west texas borders.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Hobbyists have been logging Russian freqs for years and there are DOZENS of them, Im only posting the most common ones logged from around the world.

Russian Air Force 'Tu-95 Bear Net'
Spring Schedule
8029 CW
8090 USB
8170 CW
Tu-95 Summer Schedule
8895 CW
8909 USB
Tu-95 Winter Schedule
8033 USB
8162 CW

I highly recommend subscribing to HFmonitors and UDXF on Yahoogroups and making the Numbers and Oddities Newsletters part of your regular reading routine.

A resent article on Milcom Monitoring Post also reported 8112 and 8131 as "new" winter freqs for TU-95 net activity.

Milcom Monitoring Post: Russian TU-95MS Bear Net heard on new winter freq
 

W8RMH

Feed Provider Since 2012
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
8,110
Location
Grove City, OH (A Bearcat not a Buckeye)
If the cold war is over and the Russians have disarmed their nukes why are they practicing bomber runs near the US.

I hope NORAD is still on their toes. I would make sure they get a fighter escort whenever they get near, show of force so to speak.

It's amazing what a F-35 off your left wing will do for a practice flight.
 
Last edited:

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
6,880
Location
N.E. Kansas
Sure would be a shame if numerous people happened to be sitting on those freqs while doing intensive antenna tuning.
 

bryan_herbert

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,134
Location
Las Vegas, NV. DM26jc
Be sure to download the Numbers & Oddities newsletters (especially #180) and look for Russian Navy freqs.

The G20 Summit is underway in Australia, Russia and Australia are not on the best of terms so Russia sent some warships down under. Australia also dispatched some of their own warships to head off Russia's warships so things could get interesting on shortwave the next few days.

UPDATE: Third Australian ship sent to confront Russian naval convoy as politicians play down tensions talk - 9news.com.au

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ps-north-of-Australia-in-puerile-display.html
 

bryan_herbert

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,134
Location
Las Vegas, NV. DM26jc
Make sure you keep NORAD in your radios. If a Bear violates US airspace and is within 100 miles of your listening post, I guarantee you will hear ANG pilots attempting to contact the Russian pilots on one of the two Guard channels.

121.5000 VHF Guard
243.0000 UHF Guard
283.7500 Blue 1
254.2000 Blue 4
243.6000 Blue 5
364.2000 Blue 7 AICC
320.6000 Blue 9
234.6000 Blue 10
252.0000 Blue 11
265.4000 Blue 14
271.0000 Blue 15
282.6000 Blue 17
288.4000 Blue 19
295.8000 Blue 20
362.3000 Blue 21
320.6000 Blue 24
324.0000 Blue 25
364.8000 Blue 31
387.0000 Blue 33
300.1250 Blue 40
240.0500 Blue 42
320.9000 Blue 55
321.3000 Blue 60
 

bryan_herbert

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
1,134
Location
Las Vegas, NV. DM26jc
Back in the day NORAD also had nets on HF and SATCOM

HF was, may still be 9023 kHz USB

SATCOM
Various freqs on UFO 243-270 MHz WFM 5/25 kHz channel split
 

AlaskaMike

Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
112
F-22s from Elmendorf continue to intercept Bears regularly off the coast of Alaska, just like the F-15Cs did up through the 1990s.

If you notice, virtually all the stock photos the media use for visuals for their stories are from the Alaskan F-15C intercepts (you'll see the "AK" on the vertical stabilizers).

I was always curious about catching one of those Bears on HF, so I'll start monitoring those freqs Bryan posted--thanks Bryan!
 

RobKB1FJR

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
237
Location
Lexington, NC
These TU-95 bears the ones with the big hump on the bottom of the fuselage are usually reconnaissance aircraft. Do the Soviets (classic) still have acess to a runway in Cuba? I know the Russians supposedly closed lourdes cuba which was a spy monitoring out post. One thing I have always wondered about the bear bombers is how much havoc they cause on the trans ocean international airline routes. I doubt the bears are checking in with the HF Airinc and HF air traffic controllers.
 

joeuser

The Wretched
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
1,613
Location
North Central Kansas
I didn't think those 95's had the range even over the pole... So I'd guess it would be Cuba, West of Alaska, & around/over the Barents & Kara seas...
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
If the cold war is over and the Russians have disarmed their nukes why are they practicing bomber runs near the US.

Russia prepares nuclear surprise for NATO - English pravda.ru

Quoting from the article:

The progress was made possible thanks to the treaty on the limitation of nuclear weapons, also known as START-3. The treaty was signed by Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama on 8 April 2010 in Prague (came into force on 5 February 2011). In accordance with the document, nuclear warheads of the parties are to be reduced to 1,550 by 2021. The number of carriers (intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers) is supposed to be cut to 700 units.

It was the first strategic agreement, after the treacherous policy of democrats, in which Russia managed to win significant advantages. In the treaty, the Americans, for the first time in history, undertook to reduce their strategic nuclear potential, while Russia won an opportunity to increase it. Furthermore, the new treaty removed important limitations that existed in the previous START 1 and START 2 treaties. It goes about the size of areas for the deployment of mobile ICBMs, the number of multi charge ICBMs, and the possibility to build railway-based ICBMs. Russia did not make any concessions.

Having written off Moscow as a serious geopolitical rival, flying on the wings of inaccessible military and technological superiority, Washington drove itself into a trap, from which it does not see a way out even in a medium-term perspective.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,395
Location
Bowie, Md.
Let's keep the politics out of the discussion, folks. HF freqs for hearing the flights are fine - let's keep this on target...we have a forum for discussing political issues here Mike
 

AlaskaMike

Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
112
Back in the day NORAD also had nets on HF and SATCOM

HF was, may still be 9023 kHz USB

SATCOM
Various freqs on UFO 243-270 MHz WFM 5/25 kHz channel split

Dunno about SATCOM, but I have what sounds like Link-11 on 9023 USB right now at 0453z. One sender very strong, one somewhat weak.

Mike
 

Boombox

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
1,376
I didn't think those 95's had the range even over the pole... So I'd guess it would be Cuba, West of Alaska, & around/over the Barents & Kara seas...

Tu-95's are definitely long range bombers. They have roughly an equivalent range to that of a B-52 -- over 8000 nautical miles unrefueled.

It's the Backfire bombers (a rough equivalent to our now disused FB-111) that had a range of around 3-4000 miles.

I guess it's time for me to check those frequencies and see if I hear anything. I haven't been monitoring the utility frequencies lately. That 'W' beacon I read about on one of the links posted here might be the easiest one to listen for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top