Problem we run into is people will click on the license in the database and then it will come back and say it's EXPIRED or CANCELLED. I've had several people put in tickets for these and I have removed them. I don't see how we can keep an accurate database if jurisdictions are "bootlegging" on frequencies that they are not licensed on.
So basically, the RR database is going to mimic the current FCC database from now on?
I know for a fact some cities and counties use freqs from other counties on occasion. I don't care if it is illegal or not, but they are doing it. They might not use it but twice a year, but it's in the scanner ready.
There are also systems leased by other entities that are used.
Regardless, I think it's an overzealous idea. I'd rather have too much than not enough. "Lockout" is pretty easy for me to use, if I happen to download a frequency is not used.
For people to report freqs they think are no longer used is pretty lame. I'm all for a complete and accurate database, but the way this is going is pretty counter-productive. Instead of getting a better database, you are trimming down some things that very well may be still used, since you can't "re-verify" it, and not giving anything back to it in return.
I also think this may serve to limit future database submissions somewhat, if it needs to be proven there is a valid FCC license for the submitted info. (If not, then why delete what was already submitted?)
RR database is unique in that there is personal input. Anyone can search the FCC database.