I am going out on a limb to say I think where David was going with that comment is that on legacy systems the redundancy is simpler to maintain. Most trunked systems do have a lot of redundancy built in but the resources required to maintain these systems and their redundancy can be quite extensive.
Lets take a group of county fire departments operating on VHF for example.......... If they are operating a VHF repeater for their main fire dispatch and the repeater goes of the air for whatever reason, they can switch to talkaround and still communicate (on the same frequency). Of course the range may not be as good, but we must remember that in any "failure" situation, system performance can/will be degraded. In addition, paging can still be accomplished from a fire station base radio without the need to contact personnel and have them switch to a backup frequency or radio. Also, if they have several simplex VHF frequencies in use for tactical/fireground ops, it is business as usual. No worries about fail soft occurring and dumpling multiple different working incidents all together on the same frequency.
To me, conventional/legacy systems will always be the simpler, easier to maintain solution. I understand the need for trunking and digital but there is nothing more reliable or interoperable than analog conventional.
Wes