Don't know if it's a done deal but I sure hope not.
It may be good as a long range interceptor, but apparently sux at close combat (dog fighting).
Why does the USAF need the F-35 when the F-22 has not been used in combat? - Quora
What I really can't believe is how our gov't could approve a single engined plane to begin with, especially given our cold northern climate.
Since we don't have aircraft carriers, it would seem to me the F-22 would have been the way to go for Canada.
The F-18 is still one of the best multi-role fighters out there today imo with the built in redundancy of a second engine and unmatched power to weight ratio, albeit at the expense of reduced payload capacity.
If it had stealth technology and longer range kill capability, it would still be the plane to beat imo and to this day is still one of the best close combat fighters out there, especially with the upgraded engines (Super Hornet).
But I guess the trend now in modern warfare is to forgo close combat all together and have the ability to eliminate your opponent from longer distances so you don't even have to get your hands dirty or work up a sweat.
I was lucky enough to see the F-22 at CIAS when it made an appearance there (don't remember the exact year) and with it's dual vectored thrust, that thing could turn on a dime.
Still would be nice to see the F-35.
It might actually be worth a trip down to the show this year if it is a confirmed appearance.
