• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Embedding signals in P25 voice channels.

Status
Not open for further replies.
RonBon

RonBon

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
102
Location
Sterling, Virginia
After playing with voice communications channels I found it is posible to embed simulcasted voice and data signals behind digital voice. You could play recordings of stuff at the speed of 200 words per minute or even better data bursts. The possibilities are limit less with this and can be adjusted by changing the hertz of the signal you wish to transmit. Voice, tones, songs and others can be simulcast. This is the next chapter of the E.L.F. or extra low frequency capabilities. We all know UHF E.L.F. frequincies are flat out intrusive and voda phone in the UK had to be shut down. The system nearly matched the hertz and freq of normal brain activity.

For example you could broadcast repetative tones above 40 hertz to dramatically deteriorate an employees behavior. Or you could subliminally broadcast "buy more coke" over and over.


Also sub vocal voice is able to be picked up at 5000 hertz. Its incredibly slow but understandable. I used a DMR codec to find the sub vocal voice.
 
K

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
RonBon said:
After playing with voice communications channels I found it is posible to embed simulcasted voice and data signals behind digital voice. You could play recordings of stuff at the speed of 200 words per minute or even better data bursts. The possibilities are limit less with this and can be adjusted by changing the hertz of the signal you wish to transmit. Voice, tones, songs and others can be simulcast. This is the next chapter of the E.L.F. or extra low frequency capabilities. We all know UHF E.L.F. frequincies are flat out intrusive and voda phone in the UK had to be shut down. The system nearly matched the hertz and freq of normal brain activity.

For example you could broadcast repetative tones above 40 hertz to dramatically deteriorate an employees behavior. Or you could subliminally broadcast "buy more coke" over and over.


Also sub vocal voice is able to be picked up at 5000 hertz. Its incredibly slow but understandable. I used a DMR codec to find the sub vocal voice.
Click to expand...


What? Check your tinfoil... I think it is too tight.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
mikewazowski

mikewazowski

Forums Manager/Global DB Admin
Staff member
Forums Manager
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
13,527
Location
Oot and Aboot
I've asked the OP to provide proof of his claims.

If none is received, the thread will be locked and deleted.
 
RonBon

RonBon

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
102
Location
Sterling, Virginia
I can only do it live. I will submit a recording of an ambe+2 quality codec set at all the specs minus a special adjusment on midline and highend hertz. This post was not meant to start any conspiracies or aid in disproving or proving anyone correct.

On a side note my tinfoil hat is not foil at all but instead copper wire mesh. :)
 
S

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
I agree I would need to see some sort of data on this and information. Seems impractical considering some factors.
 
K

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
ptolemy9200 said:
I agree I would need to see some sort of data on this and information. Seems impractical considering some factors.
Click to expand...


Where to begin. If it is currently not being done, how is RonBon decoding 'voices' on a P25 voice stream that are not part of the actual voice being transmitted.

Sorry but an unsubstantiated, un supported by methodology, recording is not going to be enough as 'proof'


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
K

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
6,638
Location
Sector 001
RonBon said:
I can only do it live.... minus a special adjusment on midline and highend hertz.... This post was not meant to start any conspiracies or aid in disproving or proving anyone correct.
Click to expand...

You are the one making the claim... It is up to you to prove it. A recording is not nearly enough... The 'special adjustment' and not disclosing what it is invalidates ANY claim you made in your first post.

RonBon said:
On a side note my tinfoil hat is not foil at all but instead copper wire mesh. :)
Click to expand...


Tinfoil, copper mesh what ever. It is way too tight...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
S

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
kayn1n32008 said:
Where to begin. If it is currently not being done, how is RonBon decoding 'voices' on a P25 voice stream that are not part of the actual voice being transmitted.

Sorry but an unsubstantiated, un supported by methodology, recording is not going to be enough as 'proof'


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Which is why I said I need proof. Not a recording.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

RonBon
  • Locked
Ability to simulcast embedded signal in P25 voice channels
Replies
0
Views
136
RonBon
RonBon
Top