YesAre you setting up each frequency as a one-freq P25 system to see the radio IDs?
Is it in the clear or encrypted?
in the clear, that NAC posted does NOT work nor does the universal NAC work. it's nothing too exciting just typical surveillance. they have a Tac channel they use that I can't find yet.Is it in the clear or encrypted?
in the clear, that NAC posted does NOT work nor does the universal NAC work. it's nothing too exciting just typical surveillance. they have a Tac channel they use that I can't find yet.
hmm, some more information: they use NATO phonetics not the LAPD phonetics.If it's not 167 it might not be FBI because that's what is typically used. Freq looks FBI though.
hmm, some more information: they use NATO phonetics not the LAPD phonetics.
I'd like to know what or who they are?
hmm, some more information: they use NATO phonetics not the LAPD phonetics.
I'd like to know what or who they are?
Isn't that private stuff?Well what was the NAC you monitored?
Isn't that private stuff?
I'll be happy to post if that's OK to?
all honesty, I feel that after posting this finding the users using that frequency now have to either go encrypted or switch channels and NACs. you know that saying don't ask don't tell policy.... yeah I screwed that up. Haha.
just saying....
$352It's not private if you monitored it, but you are under no obligation to post it. We might be able to tell who it was by the NAC though.
so..... no info on the NAC?