Careful what you ask for - FCC Warns CO Airport

Status
Not open for further replies.

n0nhj

In way too deep...
Feed Provider
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
351
Location
Lakewood, WA
From
https://www.rrmediagroup.com/News/NewsDetails/newsID/16119

Colorado Airport Receives Notice of Unlicensed Operation from the FCC
Thursday, October 19, 2017

The San Luis Valley Regional Airport in Alamosa, Colorado, received a notice of unlicensed operation from the FCC.

The Denver office of the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau received a complaint from the San Luis Valley Regional Airport concerning possible interference to its aeronautical advisory station frequency, 122.8 MHz. On September 19, agents from the Denver Office investigated the matter on-scene, observing operation by SLVRA employees and aircraft on 122.8 MHz at the airport.


http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1018/DOC-347300A1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kb5udf

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
803
Location
Louisiana
that was the first

I posted the link to the first license. The second was from 2004 to 2009.
 

N9PBD

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 24, 2003
Messages
535
Location
Southern Illinois (Metro St. Louis)
It looks like their licensing company, Aviation Systems Maintenance, Inc.(ASMI), may have let their client down on this one, although the renewal notice did go to the airport board in February of 2009.
 

jaymatt1978

Member
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
2,180
Location
Cape May,NJ
Not trying to start a debate nor defend unlicensed transmitting, BUT in theory the airport could sue ASM for failing to uphold their end of the contract.


It looks like their licensing company, Aviation Systems Maintenance, Inc.(ASMI), may have let their client down on this one, although the renewal notice did go to the airport board in February of 2009.
 

ten13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
650
Location
ten13
"On September 19, agents from the Denver Office investigated the matter on-scene, observing operation by SLVRA employees and aircraft on 122.8 MHz at the airport."


It seems it wasn't an expired license, but some land-based and unlicensed transmitter was operating on 122.8.

As far as the airport agency itself is concerned, it comes down to that they, "knew, or should have known..." that the violation was taking place, and did nothing about it.

What's interesting is, it seems that the airport itself contacted the FCC to complain, and now the airport is suffering the consequences of their complaint.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top