Discreet antenna for vehicle

Status
Not open for further replies.

6DIAW

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
8
Location
Center of the universe
I was wondering if anyone can point me in a direction to an antenna that i can mount on my vehicle that is extremely low profile.... under 3 inches. I have several mag mounts and various antennas that just stick out like a sore thumb.

I know that i will have a compromise on reception. but as long as it is on the out side i don't care.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
I was wondering if anyone can point me in a direction to an antenna that i can mount on my vehicle that is extremely low profile.... under 3 inches. I have several mag mounts and various antennas that just stick out like a sore thumb.

Using that size antenna for anything other than 800MHz, performance will be so poor you'd be better off with a HT whip antenna inside the vehicle.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
There's a difference between a slight preformance hit, and a complete borking of reception. A 2-3 inch VHF antenna will work about as well as a paper clip.
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
There's a difference between a slight preformance hit, and a complete borking of reception. A 2-3 inch VHF antenna will work about as well as a paper clip.

I don't totally disagree. However, I've often used a Comet Miracle Baby wide band antenna that's only 1.75" long and it works surprising well in the 450/850MHz bands!

Comet Original CH32 CH-32 144/440/900 MHz Tri-Band Miracle Baby Handheld Antenna - BNC Connector

31W203ZTA9L._SX450_.jpg
 

lmrtek

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
534
By the time you add the coax loss to such an antenna you get better performance from a factory duck on the radio
 

12dbsinad

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,953
Depending on the vehicle, AM/FM antennas work well with a splitter. Especially if its a whip mounted on the edge of the cowl.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
I don't totally disagree. However, I've often used a Comet Miracle Baby wide band antenna that's only 1.75" long and it works surprising well in the 450/850MHz bands!

Yes, in areas with strong signals.

I've used similar size antennas on HTs, and for UHF and VHF, they got maybe 1/4 the range of a full-sized antenna. If a 75% or more reduction in usable range is an acceptable tradeoff, go for it. Otherwise, a bit of black Krylon goes a long way toward making an antenna less conspiuous.
 

wtp

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
5,975
Location
Port Charlotte FL
and with a handheld in the car

i would watch around me if i picked up the radio and see many people slow down to the speed limit and some put on the seat belts. safety first !
 

6DIAW

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
8
Location
Center of the universe
Thanks for the info so far. I am trying to get ~140mhz mainly, but also want UHF... essentially a triband.

Now this talk of using a splitter for the am/fm antenna. How does one go about doing this?
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,323
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Lots of companies made an adapter you plug in between your AM/FM car radio and it gives you a feed for a scanner. They can work surprisingly well if you have a vertical AM/FM whip on your car. Search Ebay for AM/FM scanner car antenna and something should show up.
prcguy

Thanks for the info so far. I am trying to get ~140mhz mainly, but also want UHF... essentially a triband.

Now this talk of using a splitter for the am/fm antenna. How does one go about doing this?
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
The car antenna splitters only work for AM/FM broadcast and VHF. I couldn't find any that covered UHF.

The stubby antennas get worse the lower the frequency. 800 is OK, UHF is poor, and VHF is really bad. Shortening an antenna physically reduces both its efficiency and its usable bandwidth, even if you use a loading coil so it resonates at the correct frequency. Quality construction will reduce coax and other unnecessary losses, but the physics involved can't really be circumvented.

IMO you'd be better off with a thin whip either painted matte black or covered in black heat shrink. It will still be inconspicuous, but will perform reasonably well.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,323
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
AM/FM couplers are not very popular today but the big and old mfrs like Antenna Specialists made some that did VHF low through UHF and they would also work fine for local 800 stuff. I have one somewhere that I tested and it really worked great on all bands.

If you shop around you can still find some that will do VHF lo through UHF.
prcguy

The car antenna splitters only work for AM/FM broadcast and VHF. I couldn't find any that covered UHF.

The stubby antennas get worse the lower the frequency. 800 is OK, UHF is poor, and VHF is really bad. Shortening an antenna physically reduces both its efficiency and its usable bandwidth, even if you use a loading coil so it resonates at the correct frequency. Quality construction will reduce coax and other unnecessary losses, but the physics involved can't really be circumvented.

IMO you'd be better off with a thin whip either painted matte black or covered in black heat shrink. It will still be inconspicuous, but will perform reasonably well.
 

Motoballa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
403
I ordered a Laird pepper shaker for my car, hoping to get it in the mail sometime this week or next week.

Right now I use a UHF quarter wave, the repeaters in my area are good enough I can run something super small and on the lowest power setting and still get in fine. Although when I do need range I'll swap it out as needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top