• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Cross radio compatibility

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thunderknight

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
2,217
Location
Bletchley Park
From a basic push to talk use, yes. Sometimes there are manufacturer specific features that are not cross compatible. These features may or may not impact public safety users, so the best source is the system administrator.
But will it register and get a grant tone (if it’s a valid ID),yes.
 

kb4cvn

Silent Key
Joined
Mar 16, 2004
Messages
884
Location
Nowhere near a paved road, away from the maddening
Hopefully if Motorola ever bothers to fully follow the Project-25 specifications (EIA-103), yes. Harris (Lynchburg) back in the M/A-Com era was the first Project-25 Test Lab and Supplier certified by APCO as fully following the P-25 Spec.

The last time I looked, Moto still had not fully embraced the Spec, and was still going off maverick and doing non-standard stuff, apparently to lock their customer's into a single source supplier.
 

mdsxfire

EDBM
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
1,096
Location
Uxbridge, north of the river Thames
Hopefully if Motorola ever bothers to fully follow the Project-25 specifications (EIA-103), yes. Harris (Lynchburg) back in the M/A-Com era was the first Project-25 Test Lab and Supplier certified by APCO as fully following the P-25 Spec.

The last time I looked, Moto still had not fully embraced the Spec, and was still going off maverick and doing non-standard stuff, apparently to lock their customer's into a single source supplier.



I’ve been a motorola guy for a long time both Work and billy, and never really dealt with Harris and had my doubts when we were transitioning, but I’ve heard a lot of good things about Harris and so far so good.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,201
Location
Texas
Hopefully if Motorola ever bothers to fully follow the Project-25 specifications (EIA-103), yes. Harris (Lynchburg) back in the M/A-Com era was the first Project-25 Test Lab and Supplier certified by APCO as fully following the P-25 Spec.

The last time I looked, Moto still had not fully embraced the Spec, and was still going off maverick and doing non-standard stuff, apparently to lock their customer's into a single source supplier.



The subscribers have always worked according to the standard. You just have to disable the proprietary features which are enabled when the system is created on the CPS.

Both Harris and Motorola practice using non-standard features in an effort to keep the subscribers the same as the infrastructure.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Thunderknight

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
2,217
Location
Bletchley Park
Both Harris and Motorola practice using non-standard features in an effort to keep the subscribers the same as the infrastructure

Well there is probably some of that, but I think the other problem is that they end up with non-standard features because the P25 standard doesn’t contain those features. In other words, I want my radios to do X, but there is no P25 standard feature for that. Either A, I can just not have it as a capability, or B) I can implement my own way of doing it.
 

cifd64

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 27, 2007
Messages
612
Location
Northern Passaic County, NJ
Going through this now. APX Family on Harris infrastructure requires a bit more than just disabling Proprietary Features. Literally just sent the CPG to Motorola for trouble shooting. They went as far as telling me to adjust the CAI specifically, but no good. I do know there has been some issues getting Astro25 to work with Harris. However,.using a trunk simulator, I will get full access on a P7200, just a grant tone from the APX8K. no audio passage and comms drop after 2 seconds. Frustrating.
 

DisasterGuy

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
1,255
Location
Maryland Shore
I have multiple Harris radios on a Moto system and Moto radios on our Harris system. As mentioned, proprietary features must be turned off. Also the Band Plan / IDEN table needs to be inserted backwards on the Moto subscriber on the Harris system. Some over the top features such as OTAP have limitations for obvious reasons. With all that said, if you understand the finer points of each there is no reason that all basic voice features to include OTAR shouldn't be working.

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top