As per my post here http://forums.radioreference.com/li.../235253-scanner-feed-using-rasberry-pi-8.html I compared a Griffin iMic to an Edirol UA-5 and was not so surprised to find that the Edirol's ADC produced a much quieter signal when I captured 20 seconds of lull between transmissions on the same frequency and only a few minutes apart. Both periods sounded the same, except for the background noise.
I would love to know how this compares to what other 'streamers' are achieving:
I may share my stream at some point, however here are my actual tests using:
- Optoelectronics Xplorer scanner (near field receiver actually)
- Radio Shack 21-543 Digital Signal Processor inline and set to 'Narrow Bandwidth'
- A Mac running OSX 10.8.5
- iTunes receiving the m3u stream
- Soundflower/Flowerbed redirecting the Mac's audio so that
- Audacity captured the stream.
iMic first and then Edirol:
I would love to know how this compares to what other 'streamers' are achieving:
I may share my stream at some point, however here are my actual tests using:
- Optoelectronics Xplorer scanner (near field receiver actually)
- Radio Shack 21-543 Digital Signal Processor inline and set to 'Narrow Bandwidth'
- A Mac running OSX 10.8.5
- iTunes receiving the m3u stream
- Soundflower/Flowerbed redirecting the Mac's audio so that
- Audacity captured the stream.
iMic first and then Edirol:
Attachments
Last edited: