Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > System Administration and Maintenance


System Administration and Maintenance Here is where radio system managers can discuss some of the more intricate details of managing their complex radio systems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2005, 08:57 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 41
Default Zetron Dispatch Consoles & Interoperability

Does anybody have any experience with using the Zetron Series 4000 Consoles as the Command & Control for Interoperabity?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2005, 07:22 PM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

Console interoperability? Hmm, sounds like advertising copy. Interoperability involves RADIOS, not the furniture they are mounted in.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2005, 08:09 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNF2G
Console interoperability? Hmm, sounds like advertising copy. Interoperability involves RADIOS, not the furniture they are mounted in.
1) Console Systems are not "Furniture", nor do they typically (or should they have) radios mounted in them.

2) Interoperability is about "Communications"

That includes the radios, the interconnect systems (consoles or other patching equipment) AND the opperational procedures.

None of the three works alone!

And yse, "Interoperability is the current advertising buzz word in the industry today!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2005, 09:37 AM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 2,674
Default

From MRT magazine:
"The Army National Guard’s Civil Support Teams have deployed Communications-Applied Technology’s Incident Commanders Radio Interface (ICRI) to communicate with first-responder agencies.
The ICRI, a cigar box-sized device, typically takes less than five minutes to configure and allows commercial and military land mobile radios, VoIP equipment, satellite phones, cell phones, land-line phones and hybrid cellular/walkie-talkie phones to communicate.
The Civil Support Teams--of which there are currently 32 nationwide--are trained and equipped to respond to weapons of mass destruction, and to test disaster sites for deadly chemical, biological, radiological or explosive agents."

Interoperability is often computer aided connections.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2005, 12:15 PM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

"Interoperability" is like a lot of communications terminology in that it means whatever the manufacturers say it means. The biggest corporate source gets to put their own spin on common words.

Remember "Private Line" and "Privacy Plus"? Now we have "True Interoperability" - a trademark of the same corporation. Like PL, True Interoperability is unlikely to do exactly what the expression conjures in the minds of those who will be buying the equipment.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2005, 01:54 PM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveNF2G
"Interoperability" is like a lot of communications terminology in that it means whatever the manufacturers say it means. The biggest corporate source gets to put their own spin on common words.

Remember "Private Line" and "Privacy Plus"? Now we have "True Interoperability" - a trademark of the same corporation. Like PL, True Interoperability is unlikely to do exactly what the expression conjures in the minds of those who will be buying the equipment.
Interoperability is what the client wants it to be. (At least if they use a good consultant)

Yes, there is a lot of buzz, spin and BS out there.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2005, 04:49 PM
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 2,674
Default

who cares what the manufacturers say. WE bought TRP 1000 and Edicts and have the ability to let motorola, edacs, trunked and conventional all talk to each other.

Interoperability is something you do, not talk about. Maybe security guards don't use it, but real law enforcement does.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-03-2005, 03:21 PM
DaveNF2G's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Waterford, NY
Posts: 3,710
Send a message via Yahoo to DaveNF2G
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n4voxgill
who cares what the manufacturers say. WE bought TRP 1000 and Edicts and have the ability to let motorola, edacs, trunked and conventional all talk to each other.

Interoperability is something you do, not talk about. Maybe security guards don't use it, but real law enforcement does.
Government officials who lack any real technical expertise are making the purchasing decisions in many cities. All they know is what the manufacturers say, which is why those of us (taxpayers) who will be footing the bills should be concerned about what they are telling these officials and whether it is accurate or not.

I agree about "doing it" but as N_Jay pointed out, there is a lot of talk happening. Much of the talk is misinformed.

I'm not sure what your point was with that last jab. I am not a security guard. I am a college-level instructor with an M.A. (working on PhD) in Criminal Justice and some expertise in law enforcement technology.
__________________
David T. Stark, NF2G
Educator - Criminal Justice, Sociology
NF2G's Forensic Scannist Pages http://nf2g.com/scannist
Don't run from the police. Motorola always beats Mopar!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2005, 03:55 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Denton, Texas
Posts: 2
Default Zetron

Hello jungle,

Not sure about the Zetron 4000 / but DFW Communications in Arlington, TX. has a lot of understanding on the Zetron Model 6 and the Motorola console. They may be able to help.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions