Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Commercial and Professional Radio > System Administration and Maintenance


System Administration and Maintenance Here is where radio system managers can discuss some of the more intricate details of managing their complex radio systems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2005, 10:38 PM
lcsdguy's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Send a message via AIM to lcsdguy
Default Most Common PL/DPL

i'm not sure if you people are real tech's or what but, what are the most common pl's and dpl's for public safety users? thanks
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-26-2005, 10:43 PM
the-mace's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default Hope this helps

This line breaks didn't come through right. Hope you can follow the lines both ways.

PL/CTCSS CODE BY FREQ
FREQ CODE | FREQ CODE
103.5 1A | 229.1 9Z
107.2 1B | 203.5 M1
100.0 1Z | 210.7 M2
114.8 2A | 218.1 M3
118.8 2B | 225.7 M4
110.9 2Z | 223.6 M5
127.3 3A | 241.8 M6
121.8 3B | 250.3 M7
123.0 3Z | 74.4 WA
141.3 4A | 79.7 WB
146.2 4B | 69.3 WZ
136.5 4Z | 71.9 XA
156.7 5A | 77.0 XB
162.2 5B | 67.0 XZ
151.4 5Z | 85.4 YA
173.8 6A | 88.5 YB
179.9 6B | 82.5 YZ
167.9 6Z | 94.8 ZA
192.8 7A | 97.4 ZB
186.2 7Z | 91.5 ZZ
206.5 8Z
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:30 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dallas Tx
Posts: 108
Send a message via ICQ to Microwavemike Send a message via AIM to Microwavemike
Default PL??????????????/

In answer to your question, 100 Hz, !Z is the most common PL used.
As to DPL I don’t have an answer to that.

mm
__________________
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-27-2005, 11:48 AM
N_Jay's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Outside the big city in the Midwest
Posts: 9,426
Default Re: PL??????????????/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Microwavemike
In answer to your question, 100 Hz, !Z is the most common PL used.
As to DPL I don’t have an answer to that.

mm
1A 103.5

At least that hasd been my experiance.

I used to use it on my GMRS systems because I could ALWAYS find reeds/filters for it. (Back in the day when thise things were expensive)
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2005, 06:07 PM
RyltnVFD's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Over here.
Posts: 409
Default

Well, in my area, most of the departments and agencies try to keep the same PL. They all work on different frequencies normally, so there is no interference.

However, if a situation arises in which multiple agencies (township/city PD, EMS) have to communicate with each other more quickly than with a TX, they can simply switch over to a common frequency (chosen as needed), without messing with the PL's.

Anyway, to answer your question, most of our agencies use 82.5, but there are two that use DPL, one is 261, the other is 054.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2005, 07:32 PM
EMS12's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyltnVFD
Well, in my area, most of the departments and agencies try to keep the same PL. They all work on different frequencies normally, so there is no interference.

However, if a situation arises in which multiple agencies (township/city PD, EMS) have to communicate with each other more quickly than with a TX, they can simply switch over to a common frequency (chosen as needed), without messing with the PL's.

Anyway, to answer your question, most of our agencies use 82.5, but there are two that use DPL, one is 261, the other is 054.
Interoperability is a big buzz word for a lot of agencies trying to keep all these different systems talking to each other.

Using a common PL or DPL is a great way to at least try to keep them all managed. But to try and pick a common or most popular is nearly impossible.

But I vote for 123.0
__________________
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-08-2005, 09:47 PM
MikeOxlong's Avatar
Member
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Central Ontario
Posts: 2,716
Send a message via AIM to MikeOxlong Send a message via MSN to MikeOxlong Send a message via Skype™ to MikeOxlong
Default

Best bet for interoperability is CSQ.

Around here, everybody uses something different but the common mutual aid channels are all CSQ (except for the ITAC channels).
__________________
Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2005, 09:37 PM
RyltnVFD's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Over here.
Posts: 409
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike_Oxlong
Best bet for interoperability is CSQ.

Around here, everybody uses something different but the common mutual aid channels are all CSQ (except for the ITAC channels).
Our county's fire channel is CSQ, and we seem to hear more traffic from Indiana and Wisconsin than from our own dispatch. they seem to forget that not everyone's radios have PL/DPL lockout.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2005, 07:58 PM
wa8pyr's Avatar
Technischer Guru
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcsdguy
i'm not sure if you people are real tech's or what but, what are the most common pl's and dpl's for public safety users? thanks
There isn't really a "most common" PL or DPL, as such is usually set up locally. It's very common, however, for most agencies in a county (especially in suburban or rural areas) to use a common PL throughout the county. Up until the the late 70s or early 80s and the advent of programmable radios, radios were only capable of 1 tone, or maybe 2 or 4. So, everyone used the same PL so that interoperability was possible without having to use multiple radios.

The only real "common" PL I know of offhand is 156.7 Hz on the 800 MHz mutual aid frequencies.

Tom WA8PYR
__________________
Tom Swisher, WA8PYR
www.wa8pyr.net

"The Pinedale shopping mall has just been bombed with live turkeys. Film at 11."

Johnny Fever, 1978
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-2005, 11:08 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 427
Default

In my experience I have seen alot of 118.8 2B and 131.8 3B in traditional Motorola areas and 110.9 2Z in traditionally GE areas
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2005, 03:33 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Penn Valley, Ca
Posts: 220
Default

I do notice that 156.7 seems to be common for itinerant sorts of frequencies. Also as stated 100.0, 103.5 and 123.0 but beyond that it is a mishmash.

Birken
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2006, 03:35 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, MI
Posts: 483
Default

In our area the common use for pl tones is to access different towers with the same frequencies that are situated in different parts of the county. I don't see a need for them when scanning except to identify the tower that is being used for that transmission. If you put a pl tone on a scanner frequency you will only hear the signals on that frequency that have that pl tone on its signal. Also pl got its name from the old Bell Telephone private line code. It is also subaudible or mostly outside human hearing. Hoofy
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2006, 11:24 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Penn Valley, Ca
Posts: 220
Default

It is not outside human hearing at all but the radios are supposed to filter it out so it doesn't make it to the speaker. Also I have been told that Motorola invented it and coined the term "PL".

Birken
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:47 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Keweenaw Peninsula, MI
Posts: 483
Default

I stand corrected. Motorola did invent it and coined it pl for private line.
Hoofy
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2006, 02:38 PM
greateratlanta's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 42
Default

What does CSQ stand for? I'm guessing something to do with squelch.
__________________
BC246T
RS Pro-94
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2006, 07:52 PM
pfish's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento Valley, CA
Posts: 693
Default

CSQ is carrier squelch. There is no PL/DPL tone -- just the voice!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-24-2006, 07:55 PM
Caesar's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cayce, SC
Posts: 1,343
Send a message via ICQ to Caesar Send a message via AIM to Caesar
Default

dcs 315
pl 156.7 and 173.8

in my area
__________________
Uniden: BCD396T, BR330T & BCT-15 (x3)
Icom: IC-91AD & ID-800H (D-Star)
Yaesu:FT-857D
Radio Shack: Pro-163 & Pro-197
Heathkit: HA-10 (1KW Amplifier)
DV Dongle
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2006, 06:02 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 705
Send a message via AIM to jparks29 Send a message via MSN to jparks29 Send a message via Yahoo to jparks29
Default

+1 for 156.7

PL=CTCSS
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-07-2006, 02:20 AM
rattlerbb01's Avatar
Texas Database Admin
 
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Navasota, TX
Posts: 629
Send a message via AIM to rattlerbb01
Default

everything surrounding brazos county in southeast texas is 141.3. and everything around houston not including the city's uhf system (123,127.3) is 146.2. Most of deep east texas is 192.8.
__________________
Just another guy that works here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions