Delete my account or all my messages

[villager57]

You wrote to someone else that you do not delete accounts and we have simply stop using it, but you disabled the delete message as well. In response to your privacy policy, delete my account and/or all my messages or give us back the delete/edit message function.

[loumaag]

Originally Posted by villager57

You wrote to someone else that you do not delete accounts and we have simply stop using it, but you disabled the delete message as well. In response to your privacy policy, delete my account and/or all my messages or give us back the delete/edit message function.

Please see the following points:

• We do not delete messages unless there is a good reason.
• We do not delete accounts unless there is a good reason.
• You don't have any messages except the above quoted one on this forum.
• All messages, once posted, are the property of RadioReference, LLC; you have lost the right to all content you supply to the site IAW the TOS you agree to when you sign up.

Edit: I found, after getting to this thread you started that you have indeed other messages posted. Most were approved, apparently you did not read that part of the materials you were provided at sign-up that told you all new members were moderated for several posts to help prevent spam.

[villager57]

No I did. I don't see what's the fuss to not respect your "members" choice as most sites do and I have good reasons to leave. The slow new member moderation (spam) is one of the least important to me. You just seem to use an interpretation to your advantage If it is really the case, show me the TOS points where the property takeover is stated and explain me why I read the total opposite?

5) All information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, or any other materials whatsoever (collectively, "Content"), whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, is <b>the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. This means that the user, and not RadioReference.com, is entirely responsible for all Content that he or she uploads, posts, emails or otherwise transmits via the RadioReference.com Sites</b>.

6) <b>the submitting user retains ownership of such RadioReference.com Public Content;</b>

[villager57]

BTW, it is only the three first messages to avoid spam, you also show a lack of confidence or negligence, because you continue to moderate new members after that "limit".

[DonS]

6) <b>the submitting user retains ownership of such RadioReference.com Public Content;</b>

Don't forget this part:

In each such case, the submitting user grants RadioReference.com the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display such Content (in whole or part) worldwide and/or to incorporate it in other works in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed, all subject to the terms of any applicable license.

By posting anything after agreeing to the above, you irrevocably agreed to let RR.com use that content forever.

[dwh367]

Originally Posted by villager57

BTW, it is only the three first messages to avoid spam, you also show a lack of confidence or negligence, because you continue to moderate new members after that "limit".

I would guess that the first few posts also make a first impression with the moderators and let's just say maybe this wasn't a very good start for you.

[Thayne]

I am starting to wonder if something is indeed in the air or water; what with all the "Barking" going on lately---

[cfr301]

Originally Posted by villager57

No I did. I don't see what's the fuss to not respect your "members" choice as most sites do and I have good reasons to leave. The slow new member moderation (spam) is one of the least important to me. You just seem to use an interpretation to your advantage If it is really the case, show me the TOS points where the property takeover is stated and explain me why I read the total opposite?

5) All information, data, text, software, music, sound, photographs, graphics, video, messages, or any other materials whatsoever (collectively, "Content"), whether publicly posted or privately transmitted, is <b>the sole responsibility of the person from whom such Content originated. This means that the user, and not RadioReference.com, is entirely responsible for all Content that he or she uploads, posts, emails or otherwise transmits via the RadioReference.com Sites</b>.

6) <b>the submitting user retains ownership of such RadioReference.com Public Content;</b>

Thousands of great folks around the world use this Forum comply with the rules and then one or two like YOU show up and try to rock the boat.

[milf]

LOL Sometimes you just can't make people happy no matter what you do. In this case the best idea is for the OP to either do full research,... Or to just never return if his/her level of satisfaction is that low.

Oh I do hear that purina changed formulas.... Or maybe its the fluoride???

[cfr301]

Originally Posted by milf

LOL Sometimes you just can't make people happy no matter what you do. In this case the best idea is for the OP to either do full research,... Or to just never return if his/her level of satisfaction is that low.

Oh I do hear that purina changed formulas.... Or maybe its the fluoride???

LOL! I always like the Episode of Dragnet where Joe Friday says to the Loud Mouth.."I'll bet your momma has a loud bark"

[wayne_h]

I'll summarize: I nor any moderator will be deleting any of your posts. I'm sorry you're unable to interpret the TOS properly but once you post we have the complete and total authority on what happens to that content.

I will not be deleting your account either since it's not policy to. Our advice is to just stop coming here.