Okay I have to turn to the community on this one.
Yesterday I was driving home and caught a snippet of digital comms on TABC Ops (156.0600MHz, normally CT 136.5). I thought no way, but the comms were there, NAC 300. I heard some 27/28s being ran but the signal was definitely skip in from somewhere. Searching Texas here it doesn't show anybody in Texas with that NAC, or anyone digital with that freqeuncy for that matter.
Looking at this document I just found here, page 92, shows that TABC is expected to switch to P25 (though they only need 120 portables and 250 mobiles- seems like a only a few). This document was orginally created in '08, expected to be completed by late 2010.
So drop the CT and try to catch some TABC on P25!. Even if it turns out to not be TABC I'd like to know who it is.
Ok. I've tried to leave the subject in all caps, but upon previewing the title it drops it in to lower case- I hate that.
Yesterday I was driving home and caught a snippet of digital comms on TABC Ops (156.0600MHz, normally CT 136.5). I thought no way, but the comms were there, NAC 300. I heard some 27/28s being ran but the signal was definitely skip in from somewhere. Searching Texas here it doesn't show anybody in Texas with that NAC, or anyone digital with that freqeuncy for that matter.
Looking at this document I just found here, page 92, shows that TABC is expected to switch to P25 (though they only need 120 portables and 250 mobiles- seems like a only a few). This document was orginally created in '08, expected to be completed by late 2010.
So drop the CT and try to catch some TABC on P25!. Even if it turns out to not be TABC I'd like to know who it is.
Ok. I've tried to leave the subject in all caps, but upon previewing the title it drops it in to lower case- I hate that.