RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Texas Radio Discussion Forum


Texas Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Texas.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-05-2011, 03:40 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Galveston County, TX
Posts: 9
Default Minimums

Around 2000, I had an awesome scanner that I had programed to pick up everything in my area, Galveston County/Santa Fe & Brazoria County/Alvin. After my truck was stolen in 2003, with my scanner in it, I never replaced it.
I'm finding that now I've retired from EMS, that I miss listening to the scanner like I used to and I'm wanting to get another. Since my area has yet to go digital, can I go with something like my old radio shack scanner from 2000? Or have things changed in other ways with the systems that I need to be concerned about? While I'd love to fork out a few hundred to get a digital handheld, money is just too tight to do so right now. Basically, what can I buy and still enjoy everything I used to have on my old scanner without spending a ton of cash?
I wish the online scanner of Galveston Co expanded a little further to include Santa Fe, is there anyway I can ask them to add it?
Thanks in advance for your suggestions and thoughts!
Jen
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2011, 08:43 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 11,892
Default

Jen,

Well welcome to RR! Whereas you are correct that Galveston Co. has not made the transition to digital yet, is only a matter of time. In this case, a relatively short time. I have no timetable, but the trunking radio system that used to be Galveston is part of the TXWarn Moto system (that used to be called the Harris Co system). In any case they are rolling out the TXWarn P25 system and sooner or later everyone will move to it. The transition seems to be happening sooner in the north and east of the area than to the south and west (with some notable exceptions); however, it is happening. For the current time, an analog trunking scanner will fill the bill provided it is rebanding capable. In addition, if you decide to invest in a digital capable scanner, make sure that what you buy is a newer version with the capability to operate in the 700 MHz spectrum.

If you have any specific questions, go ahead and ask away.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2011, 09:20 AM
Member
   
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Galveston County, TX
Posts: 9
Default

Thanks! Now if I remember right, I had the Radio Shack Pro-51, lol 10 years ago, it was over $100, and I thought it was pretty good. Never had any issues with it. Do you think that one will work okay until the system changes over? I'm enjoying listening the Galveston Co things on the internet, but it seems to be all Galveston Island stuff, nothing from the mainland.
Since most of the older types like the Pro-51 are an absolute steal on Ebay, is there a step up from the Pro-51 that would be better?
I'm so excited that nothing locally has changed yet, it will give me some time to save some money for the digital, and I want the best of the best once they change over locally. ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-06-2011, 09:43 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 11,892
Default

Well, I am pretty sure it wasn't a Pro-51, as that is a conventional only scanner. Could you be thinking of a Pro-90 or Pro-91? Both were early RS trunking scanners.

I own a Pro-90 and it still works on the TXWarn Moto system; however, since they are getting license modifications for changing to the rebanded frequencies, I fear that shortly it won't be useful around here as a trunking scanner. There is still quite a lot of conventional stuff around, even it will be changing (by law) by January 2013 to super narrow band. Mostly, such a change is going to probably mean some sort of digital signal. Not really necessary, but that seems to be trend. I know that you indicated you were interested in the local EMS stuff, but in case you have a hankering for the state police (DPS), they are all P25 conventional now.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 09:53 AM
motorola_otaku's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stinkadena, TX
Posts: 334
Default

Okay, here is the non-technical tl;dr version of what Lou is trying to say:

1.) What was the Galveston County 800 system back in 1999-2001 is now part of the Harris County Regional Radio System, aka TxWARN.

2.) There are actually two radio systems operated by Harris County: the old analog system linked above and a new P25 digital system that is still in the process of being built out. There are only a handful of talkgroups on this system in Galveston County right now which probably won't be of interest to you, but the entire county is expected to transition to it from the analog system within the next 1-2 years.

3.) The entire analog system is about to undergo a frequency reconfiguration process known as "rebanding" which will render many older trunktracker scanners useless. This will occur much sooner than the transition to the digital system; all available sources point to it occurring before the end of 2011 or in early 2012. Here is a list of scanners that support rebanding and a more technical description of rebanding and what it entails if you're interested.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 11:23 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland,TX
Posts: 22
Default

One more thought. If you are buying from ebay, check out something like the Pro-95. If you have never programmed a scanner with a computer interface now would be a good time to learn. When its time to program a digital scanner you will have a better understanding of the process.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 12:07 PM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 11,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorola_otaku View Post
Okay, here is the non-technical tl;dr version of what Lou is trying to say:...
I'd love to know what that highlighted bit up there was; also, can you follow my around and translate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mush0man View Post
One more thought. If you are buying from ebay, check out something like the Pro-95. If you have never programmed a scanner with a computer interface now would be a good time to learn. When its time to program a digital scanner you will have a better understanding of the process.
The Pro-95 would be a fine if someone was giving it away, but since we are about to re-band around here, it would be next to useless in almost no time.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2011, 08:11 PM
texasemt13's Avatar
CenTex DBA
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FM 1102, Texas
Posts: 2,227
Default

tl;dr = too long;didn't read
__________________
John H. "Boat" Boatright
Elecraft K2; RACAL 25; Yaesu FT-7900R, FT-270; GRE PSR-500
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2011, 09:46 AM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland,TX
Posts: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loumaag View Post
I'd love to know what that highlighted bit up there was; also, can you follow my around and translate.
The Pro-95 would be a fine if someone was giving it away, but since we are about to re-band around here, it would be next to useless in almost no time.
Happened sooner than I thought it would.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-29-2011, 11:16 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 11,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mush0man View Post
Happened sooner than I thought it would.

Well it is almost December and that was the target. I suspect that it will all be done by the end of the week.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2011, 12:51 AM
N5AMS's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Tx.
Posts: 137
Send a message via AIM to N5AMS Send a message via Yahoo to N5AMS
Default

yea Merry Christmas now the hp-1 lou can i enter the bandplan and just the control channels or do in need to enter all the frequencies?
__________________
Aaron Siller
| N5AMS | WQKN555 |
| BCD996T (on loan) | BD396XT | BCD996XT | Pro97 | Pro2055 (Feed Scanner) | Pro2051 remote (soon to be back home) | HP-1 Extreme |
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2011, 07:53 AM
Mentor
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N5AMS View Post
yea Merry Christmas now the hp-1 lou can i enter the bandplan and just the control channels or do in need to enter all the frequencies?
You can enter the bandplan & control channel frequencies (or just edit them to the new values). I had one "flip" between database updates, so I just updated it in Sentinel, then downloaded to the HP-1.
__________________
Steve
BCD996T-BCD396XT(2)-BCD396T-Home Patrol 1-PSR500-BR330T-BC246T-BC250D-BC780XLT
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2011, 01:13 PM
motorola_otaku's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Stinkadena, TX
Posts: 334
Default

The channel plan/table is the same for every Motorola Type II system, so I don't know why the scanner manufacturers didn't, in all their infinite wisdom, just embed it in the firmware and make it a menu item. Rebanded System: On/Off. Easy pleasey. Obviously it just confuses people to have to enter the channel tables manually.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2011, 10:17 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Moderator
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 11,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorola_otaku View Post
The channel plan/table is the same for every Motorola Type II system, so I don't know why the scanner manufacturers didn't, in all their infinite wisdom, just embed it in the firmware and make it a menu item. Rebanded System: On/Off. Easy pleasey. Obviously it just confuses people to have to enter the channel tables manually.
A point I ponder myself. At least some of the software vendors took pity on the users and just added a checkbox to choose the rebanded lineup.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2010 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2011 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions