Account  |  Mobile  |  Help    
 
Home Database Live Audio Forums Wiki Classifieds Submit Info About

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Regional Radio Discussion Forums > Texas Radio Discussion Forum


Texas Radio Discussion Forum Forum for discussing Radio Information in the State of Texas.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2007, 12:28 PM
gatorhater's Avatar
Member
 
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: metro Atlanta, GA
Posts: 391
Default Police drop Radio codes to speak same language

10-4 no more

Police drop radio codes to speak same language

By MARK AGEE
STAR-TELEGRAM STAFF WRITER

"Signal 16" means a sexual assault to police in Southlake, but in Hurst it means a dog bite.

The code "10-12" means "No one is around and I can talk freely" in Hurst, but in several other Tarrant County cities it means the exact opposite: "The subject is near and I can't talk freely."

Fearing mass confusion and miscommunication in the event of a large-scale disaster requiring several departments to work together, federal officials are encouraging police departments to drop codes in favor of plain English.

Many agencies in the area are complying, including Hurst, which will begin changing to plain talk in the next few weeks.

"It's going to be a gradual thing," police spokesman Sgt. Craig Teague said. "It's kind of like training old dogs. We've got officers here who have been talking in the same codes for 25 years. It's going to take a while for them."

As part of its disaster preparedness plans, the federal government requires local agencies to use plain language instead of "10" and "signal" codes during events involving multiple jurisdictions as a condition of receiving Homeland Security grant money.

Federal officials are recommending, but not requiring, that police begin using plain language in their day-to-day internal communications as well.

"We believe that it is important to practice every day the terminology and procedures that will be used in emergency incidents and disasters," said Ashley Small, a Federal Emergency Management Agency spokeswoman in Washington.

"There needs to be no misinterpretation, no one looking up codes and no second-guessing," said Brian Ellis, a coordinator for the National Incident Management System.

Relic from another era

Codes were devised to save time on the radio when channels were scarce, said Fred Keithley, an emergency preparedness coordinator with the North Central Texas Council of Governments.

"Technology has sort of remedied that, for the most part, and clear communications are the priority," Keithley said.

The problem with codes is that they vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and across the country.

Some examples are trivial, but others could cost lives. A "10-13" means "weather information" in North Richland Hills, but "officer down" in many jurisdictions.

The use of codes has persisted for two reasons: habit, and the desire to keep communications secure from criminals who could be listening to a scanner.

"If you listen for a while you can figure them out anyway," Southlake police spokeswoman Lt. Rhonda Moore said. "It's more important to know what each other are talking about. A breakdown in communication would cause much more of a security hazard than people listening to a scanner."

North Richland Hills police made the switch to plain talk in August because of the federal recommendations, police spokesman Larry Irving said.

A communication from North Richland Hills dispatch that used to sound like "10-3 the Signal 2" is now "Disregard the major accident."

A welcome change

Some agencies across the nation have resisted the switch, but police in the area -- especially in Northeast Tarrant County, where the small cities have mutual-aid agreements -- are embracing it.

Irving, Haltom City and Grapevine have officially used plain language for some time. Arlington has been using it since the 1980s. Euless also made the switch about 20 years ago, Assistant Police Chief Harland Westmoreland said.

"When we went to it, there wasn't a whole lot of talk about interoperability like there is today," he said. "We went to it because it was easier. It gets tough trying to remember 60 or 70 different signal codes. So when they started recommending that we change things, we were already there."

Keller police switched to plain talk last month because the department is merging communication operations with Southlake's, Keller Lt. Brenda Slovak said.

Others, such as Southlake, still have some codes, but they aren't used much.

"We use a few codes for simple things that everyone understands, but plain talk is really the best way to go," Moore said. "So much of our stuff is interagency anyway. A lot of us don't have the resources to handle a major incident by ourselves. We all help each other out, and we've learned how to talk to each other."

In Fort Worth, officers are trained in federal protocols but still use many codes, police spokesman Lt. Dean Sullivan said.

"We definitely have interoperability; that's not an issue," Sullivan said. "Our computer dispatch system is based on signal codes, so I don't see us going away from it completely any time soon. But, if you listen to our radio chatter, there's a lot of plain talk anyway because it's easier."

POLICE CODES

Federal officials are encouraging police to drop the use of codes because they vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Here are some examples of codes, some of which have already been dropped.

Signal 5

Sexual assault in Fort Worth, Hurst, Keller and North Richland Hills

Burglar alarm in Southlake

Signal 28

Drive-by shooting in North Richland Hills

Meet ambulance in Hurst and Fort Worth

Found property in Keller

Criminal mischief in Southlake

SOURCES: Police departments
Mark Agee, 817-685-3821 rmagee@star-telegram.com
__________________
Don't Steal, the Government Hates Competition!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-20-2007, 05:08 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 647
Default

Your about a day late and a dollar short. This information has been drifting around
the country about various departments now for about 6 months or so.

Major problem is that even when it is announced that they are going to do it, don't
hold your breath. The state of Virginia was one of the first in the country to
make the news. Guess what, they are still today using all their 10 codes.

Habbits are hard to break. Most police departments don't like change and
even though they made the announcement of the change, it doesn't happen.

Jim



[QUOTE=gatorhater]10-4 no more

Police drop radio codes to speak same language
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2007, 05:38 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 200
Default

The same thing was announced here in the Midland/Odessa area a couple of months ago. Odessa has been in the process of dropping the 10 codes for a couple of years now, now saying "affirmative" instead of 10-4, or on-the-scene instread of 10-23,etc. Midland has been a bit slower to accept it and is still using 10 codes and signals.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
San Antonio EDACS system and the press blantonl Texas Radio Discussion Forum 8 05-03-2009 12:53 PM
Detroit Police Radio Codes gpghosts Michigan Radio Discussion Forum 7 06-28-2006 09:33 AM
Cumberland County tazman3851 Maine Radio Discussion Forum 2 09-01-2005 06:57 PM
The July 2005 So. NV Radio Scanner Book (3rd Ed.) TOUGHLIFE Nevada Radio Discussion Forum 13 07-13-2005 08:49 AM
Aroostook County tazman3851 Maine Radio Discussion Forum 1 03-28-2005 02:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All information here is Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2009 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions