• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Air Traffic Controller Sounds Alarm

Status
Not open for further replies.

iMONITOR

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
6,320
Location
MACOMB, MI.
#1
Are there any RR members that work in this profession?


Air Traffic Controller Sounds Alarm

By Alex Altman and Tiffany Sharples

Passengers wringing their hands over delayed flights and lost baggage isn't the only problem plaguing airlines. A near collision on the tarmac at Dallas-Fort Worth airport on April 6 punctuated a six month period that included 15 other runway "incursions" — a spike from eight during the same period the year before. Having operated for more than 600 days without a new contract from the FAA, morale among air traffic controllers is at an all-time low, and with just 11,100 fully trained professionals serving the entire country — the smallest number in 16 years — a combination of fatigue and frustration is laying a dangerous groundwork. Doug Church, union spokesman for the National Air Traffic Controllers Association, says the practitioners of this unsung profession are being hung out to dry. "We're left trying to hold the system together like MacGyver — with duct tape and scissors and string." TIME caught up with air traffic controller Melvin S. Davis, a 22-year veteran and the facility representative for Terminal Radar Approach Control for Southern California, which serves airports in Los Angeles, Burbank, Ontario, Orange County, Palm Springs and San Diego.

TIME: Air traffic controllers are frequently ranked as among the most stressful of jobs. Why?

Melvin S. Davis: There are intense amounts of stress in short bursts. Studies can link the fact that we — myself being one of them — die much younger than our counterparts. And that comes back to stress and the impact it has on the body. My daily routine is dealing with aircrafts that have anywhere between two and four hundred people on board, and that are traveling at about 600 miles an hour. They all have an objective — to get the airplane on the ground as quickly as possible. And I have to be the traffic cop. In the high-density, terminal environment, there's one individual who has to pull it all together, and that's me.

What are the inherent difficulties in pulling together that process?

One of our Achilles heels is a very antiquated communications system. We use 1950s technology to communicate in a 2010 environment. The frustrating thing is, there are incredible technologies available for communicating — via data-link or digital voice radio systems — and I've seen people die because we haven't implemented those technologies

Is cost the reason why?

It's more politics than it is cost. The FAA is a rule-making agency. When you've got to do rule-making, politics get involved, and then it's hard to decide which equipment, whose company gets mandated, etc. And it's not necessarily just the lawmakers that complicate the process, but all the stakeholders: the airlines, general aviation, corporate aviation and then the government's air traffic control. To do nothing is a lot easier.

How does communication with planes work?

It's really fairly simple. We're using a CB radio with a little bit higher power. If you fast-forward to the way we communicate over cell phones or the Internet, or data-link technology, all those technologies are available, and we're not using them. We're stuck in the CB radio, Smokey Bear days.

How much of a hindrance is using outdated technology?

We had a labor dispute a couple of years ago that has now transitioned into a safety issue. The FAA had a mandate from Congress to start running things like a business, to be more cost-effective. That has manifested itself in the rise of runway incursions [airplanes invading each other's ground space]. These are very clearly the result of a reduction in staffing, a decline in experience, and an increase in the use of employee overtime, which leads to increased fatigue. The result is a 300-400% increase in operational errors. Listen, this is a great job and I will retire happy. This is not about work rules. It's about the guys I see walking by my office with black circles under their eyes on their third cup of coffee. And they're making mistakes, which results in two bullet trains coming together at 600 miles an hour from opposite directions.

How could the safety situation be improved?

I strive for perfection, but I'm human. The way to fix that is to provide oversight and redundancy. There are two pilots in the ****pit of every commercial aircraft. If one of them has a heart attack or makes a mistake, the other one is there to fix it. What's happened over the last few years is to save money, they've engineered out oversight of the human element. It's too expensive to have that second team sitting and watching the first team. So the bottom line is that one of the prescriptions for improving safety is hiring and retaining high-quality individuals in the places where we have the greatest amount of risk. But that's too expensive. And so we have a rise in operational errors. It's a business decision.

And what could be the consequences?

I can tell you. In 1991 there was a horrible accident in LA, we — being air traffic controllers — cleared one airplane to land on an occupied runway. We killed 34 people. I was there the next morning, I knew the person that did it. I saw her go out on stress leave. I saw the body bags come out of the airplane, and I can tell you, I've got that sinking feeling in my stomach right now that we're just another day away from another one of those situations. It's going to break my heart, because we've been telling everyone to listen. We've been very careful not to be Chicken Little, but we're at the point of critical mass.

Do you think the public understands challenges facing air traffic controllers?

I would say that we've been treated fairly well in the media and in public perception. When I introduce myself and say what I do, overwhelmingly people say, "Wow, you guys are doing a great job. Hang in there, we're pulling for you."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1735387,00.html?imw=Y
 

ScanDaBands

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Jan 21, 2005
Messages
0
Location
State Line
#6
LeeBarnes said:
Roger, Center. I am east bound and downwind. Looks like we've got a long ways to go but the flight schedule says we have a short time to get there.
Boooooooooy , when I get dis here plane home - I'ma gonna slap your momma :lol:
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2003
Messages
1,653
Location
Houston, Texas
#7
I hate how the person calls his freaking aircraft radio a CB with a little higher power. Make that about 10 times or more power on a completely different band. I also hate how he/she seems to think that cell phones and the internet will help with communication while in the air. If they did implement that, and the system broke down, oh boy think of what would happen.
 

Zaratsu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
358
Location
Eastern Connecticut
#8
scanfan03 said:
I hate how the person calls his freaking aircraft radio a CB with a little higher power. Make that about 10 times or more power on a completely different band. I also hate how he/she seems to think that cell phones and the internet will help with communication while in the air. If they did implement that, and the system broke down, oh boy think of what would happen.
Yah, technology would F it up more. The system is overloaded, but it is not comms systems that will help it. I think what they are hinting at is automation, not nextel for pilots.

Comparrisons were made to other countries having better equipment/tech. That would be news to me. Take a listen to any HF or streaming ATC in other countries for proof. I have spent hours listening to streaming ATC at Heathrow, Kai Tak, Jan Smuts, and Ben Gurion. Busy, if not busier than NYC or Boston ATC traffic and all handled similarly.:confused:
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,126
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
#9
"I hate how the person calls his freaking aircraft radio a CB with a little higher power. Make that about 10 times or more power on a completely different band."

Er, no. The tower radio outputs 10W into a discone (usually) which is 3dB more ERP but at a much higher frequency the miles per watt is actually much less. Makes no difference, aircraft altitude more than makes up for it. Now I'm wondering what sort of ERP the aircraft gets out of a panel antenna and just how an 11M AM signal would sound in the same situation.

Hmmm, the British version of Convoy was done by Laurie Lingo and the Dipsticks, copy that Speedbird?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top