• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Attic Antenna

Status
Not open for further replies.

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
1,873
Location
Northeast PA
#4
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A403 Safari/8536.25)

We can answer for receiving, but to help us provide better info, what band(s), service(s), frequencies will you be transmitting on? Answering that question is a whole other animal in terms of antennas.
 
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Location
Oklahoma
#5
There are two problems with any indoor antenna no matter where it is indoors. One is that the structure surrounding the antenna will attenuate the received signal (to some extent). The other is that since you are nearer to all the electrical devices in your home they will tend to 'hear' you, as in RFI. That works in both directions, your radio may hear those electrical devices too. So, it amount to evaluating the antenna's surroundings and then handling the interference you WILL get/produce.
Think of the antenna's size in relation to the wave length of the frequency(s) of use. In general, the bigger the better until it get's ridiculous.
Not much specific help but this can make things easier... or harder depending on how you look at it. :)
- 'Doc
 

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
1,873
Location
Northeast PA
#6
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A403 Safari/8536.25)

There are two main reasons people want to use attic antennas: they can't put anything on the roof, and the attic is better than a back-of-the-set antenna. I'm assuming the OP knows the best place to put an antenna is outdoors/on the roof.... both for better signal and to get away from RFI in the house. And that the OP cannot use the roof. That leaves the attic as the next best choice.
So what can be done in the attic? Lots of posts on this topic already here on RR. Search forums using "attic" as your search term.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
6
#10
attic antenna

This is what I did,your mileage may very.
Bought the cheapest antenna I could(read radio shack 19 in quarter wave,three radial antenna about $25 and bought 30 ft of rg58 coax and connectors)
I ran my coax thru the wall and into the attic.
Then I put the antenna together,went to the attic and hooked up the coax.
now this is the tricky part.
I set the antenna down on the ceiling insolation and the ceiling joist,resting on the radials.
check the swr on 2 mtr @1.5
you might have to trim the vertical radiator(cut the end).
Mike
KC9BUH

PS worst part was fishing the coax down the wall.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
280
Location
United Kingdom
#11
If you intend to monitor on a fixed freq or relatively narrow frequency band, choosing an antenna which is as resonant as possible for that frequency range is a good starting point, no matter what the brand name is.

But antenna choice aside, filtering can be as important. Filtering can improve SNR by 6dB - 9dB (or more).

Typical off-the-shelf consumer type scanners/receivers, as a rule have front ends comprimised by budget and volume - both these criteria impact demodulated audio quality.

Investment in a good quality pass band filter - mounted directly to the antenna - will make a big big difference by way of removing all the trash in the air that would otherwise saturate your scanner/receiver front-end with noise.

Don't underestimate the difference a good quality pass band filter can make. My personal favorite are cavity type pass band filters - they can be obtained for as broad, or narrow a bandwidth as desired while still retaining decent shape and roll-off characteristics. never be too concerned about the signal strength loss/es that cavities incurr. The improvement in SNR they provide will always off-set signal strength loss - and anyway, scanners/receivers are nowadays as a rule plenty sensitive enough (which is no small part of the problem in that they saturate easily).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top