Balun question

Status
Not open for further replies.

pyro424

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
164
Hi i have an antenna called a windom. Basically a dipole with a balun inside a pvc pipe. It was given to me as the top broke off. Well i repaired it by replacing the pvc cap etc. My question is though. I took my multimeter and put it to the diode setting. So that i can check connectivity. I get connectivity between the hot and cold side of the dipole. And also if i put the multimeter on one side of the dipole that has connectivity to the center of the so239 and the outside "shield" as well. Is this how it should be? Or should there be no connectivity between sides?

Thanks
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
Your and my definition of a 'windom' antenna aren't the same I guess. A windom is a 1/2 wave antenna fed off center with a single wire as the feed line. It's 'worked' against ground (a GOOD ground system as in radials). A lot of the "windoms" sold are just off center fed 1/2 waves fed with coax (OCFD). Neither kind requires a balun at all. A choke, yes, but no balun. If you have to use something then use an 'unun', unbalanced to unbalanced transformer would be more appropriate. Still not needed.
 

jwt873

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
1,746
Location
Woodlands, Manitoba
Feeding a dipole off-center presents a different impedance compared to the center. Typically you're looking at ~200 ohms. If you're using 50 ohm coax, you should have a 4:1 balun. Most modern commercial 'Windom' antenna kits (Carolina, Buxcomm, etc) come with 4:1 baluns...

If you search for voltage balun, you'll see how they're wound and should be able to determine how to ring them out using a meter.
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
Lets see. Unbalanced antenna, unbalanced feed line, so why a ->BALUN<- at all? An unun, maybe. But even that's a waste, not needed.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The coax fed "Carolina Windom" OCFD types are usually tapped around the 200 ohm point where a 4:1 transformer is appropriate. Its difficult to test the balun or transformer with an ohmmeter and I think the best way to test them is with an antenna analyzer on the 50 ohm side and put a non inductive resistor across the antenna wire terminals. They also need a good 1:1 choke balun in the feedline as they are inherently unbalanced and can put a lot of RF on the coax.

Lets see. Unbalanced antenna, unbalanced feed line, so why a ->BALUN<- at all? An unun, maybe. But even that's a waste, not needed.
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
What's the obsession with "baluns"? The OCFD isn't a balanced antenna. Coax isn't a balanced feed line. So, no balun is required at all. An unun might be useful though. As for a "choke balun", there is no such thing. That unun is a transformer too, so could do that impedance transformation.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Just because I might have 40lbs of ferrite cores on hand at any given time doesn't mean I'm obsessed, but I do assemble lots of "choke baluns" "un-uns" and various RF transformers every month. A choke balun can transform a balanced antenna to unbalanced coax by virtue of the input to output isolation it provides. 30dB of isolation is plenty to make the antenna unaware of what's connected to the other side of the choke you just installed at its feedpoint and that choke is now a "balun".

If you run an OCFD without an RF choke somewhere in the line please keep that D104 away from your lip, we don't want you to get an RF burn.



What's the obsession with "baluns"? The OCFD isn't a balanced antenna. Coax isn't a balanced feed line. So, no balun is required at all. An unun might be useful though. As for a "choke balun", there is no such thing. That unun is a transformer too, so could do that impedance transformation.
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
Still a choke ain't a balun, although the end result can be the same. Sort of the difference between chopping off a finger with an axe instead of going to a surgeon.
As for an OCFD, I ran one for quite some time. Didn't get 'bit' even once (no balun/unun).
PRCGUY, you weren't being singled out with the ferrite core thingy, everybody is included in that. It seems every time someone talks about making or putting up an antenna a balun is always included. In most cases I think it's waste of time and money.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Many HF antennas don't need anything but coax attached, some need an impedance transformation and the vast majority can benefit from a common mode choke on the feedline. Take the OCFD, its usually tapped around the 200 ohm spot. Needs a transformer and will greatly benefit from a common mode choke. The common mode RF and radiation off the coax of an OCFD is so bad that one mfr puts a choke balun in a strategic spot and advertises their antenna now has a tuned vertical radiator on a few specific bands. Without that choke the whole feedline is a radiator. A 133ft 80-10m OCFD has been my main HF antenna for a couple of years now and I like it a lot but with a choke balun on the coax.

On any HF wire antenna I've had here, placing a good common mode choke, or choke balun with 30dB+ isolation has reduced my noise floor a lot on the lower HF bands. I run several radios with spectrum displays and its obvious, no choke, higher noise floor and birdies, cheap choke, a little improvement, really good choke, big cleanup of my noise floor and I can hear weak signals with chokes in line that I can't without the chokes.

I and many people have RFI riding on the coax and getting in somewhere on the path between the radio and antenna where its picked up by the antenna and received. Two of my operating positions have computers, routers and other noise makers nearby where the coax runs parallel with computer power leads, CAT5, USB, etc. Not only does a choke balun at the antenna improve my reception, another one at the radio end reduced it a little more.

The first time I noticed this many years ago was with a G5RV type antenna with a poorly made 1:1 choke balun at the ladder line/coax junction that arced over. I replaced it with a much better choke and noticed my noise floor went down. I put a similar lousy one back and the noise floor went back up a little. I turned off all my computer junk in the shack that was near the coax and the noise went back down. I temporarily routed the coax to a different area away from the computers and related cables and low noise floor with computers on. I think I proved noise was riding up my coax to my antenna and that a very effective choke was snuffing it out.

Since then I've seen similar results on other setups and tested a dozen different brands of choke baluns both on air and on the test bench and found one brand stands out above all others and I put those on most everything or make home made copies of them. I also found most tubular shaped choke baluns are simply a string of ferrite beads over some coax. At best I've measured about 18 to 20dB of isolation on those and that peaks near the middle of the bands and is worse on 80m. The choke types with turns wrapped around a toroid ring can reach 30dB or a little more isolation but still favor one end of the HF band or the other. The best have multiple large beads or cores with separate windings around each one and even different mix ferrites to cover different parts of the HF band. These can reach 40dB or more isolation and cost a lot more to make but they really clean up problems and lower your noise floor to the limits.

We can agree most HF antennas don't require a choke on the feedline but I can say most will benefit from one.

Still a choke ain't a balun, although the end result can be the same. Sort of the difference between chopping off a finger with an axe instead of going to a surgeon.
As for an OCFD, I ran one for quite some time. Didn't get 'bit' even once (no balun/unun).
PRCGUY, you weren't being singled out with the ferrite core thingy, everybody is included in that. It seems every time someone talks about making or putting up an antenna a balun is always included. In most cases I think it's waste of time and money.
 
Last edited:

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
If you have the extra feed line to wind a choke, do so. It won't hurt a thing.
One of the many ways of feeding a doublet is by transformer (inductive) coupling. It can do some impedance matching. It is not a balun because it isn't designed to and doesn't do any 'balance' changing.
In most, if not all, cases a balun makes very little difference. The biggest difference is a slight change in the antennas radiation pattern. That pattern is never going to be purely symmetrical so worrying about it is a waste of good worry.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Transformer coupling on a doublet with a true transformer with isolated primary and secondary and inductive coupling will indeed be a balun and will properly feed the balanced antenna with unbalanced feedline. A tapped autotransformer would not be a balun.

My main focus with ferrites is RF chokes or 1:1 choke baluns, which balance by virtue of huge input to output isolation. They are simple and effective for reducing RF on the feedline, making peace between your coax and doublet, reducing your noise pickup from the coax and lowering your receive noise floor, correcting skewed patterns on Yagi's from coax radiation and probably some other stuff.

If the OP has successfully repaired his Windom thing, I would suggest he puts a good 1:1 ferrite choke balun in the feedline near the antenna.

If you have the extra feed line to wind a choke, do so. It won't hurt a thing.
One of the many ways of feeding a doublet is by transformer (inductive) coupling. It can do some impedance matching. It is not a balun because it isn't designed to and doesn't do any 'balance' changing.
In most, if not all, cases a balun makes very little difference. The biggest difference is a slight change in the antennas radiation pattern. That pattern is never going to be purely symmetrical so worrying about it is a waste of good worry.
 

jwt873

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Messages
1,746
Location
Woodlands, Manitoba
I guess balun gets used as a catch all for all sorts of antenna matching/balancing devices. As W5lz points out, a device connecting an unbalanced coax to an unbalanced antenna would technically be an un-un..

I had Buxcom's version of the Windom antenna many years ago. (FWIW, they call their included matching transformer a balun). The Buxcom doesn't come with a feedline choke like the Carolina Windom does. I was getting zapped whenever my hand I touched the base of my CW key when I was transmitting. I was also getting loud buzzing from my computer speakers. There was RF galore in the shack when I transmitted.

I eventually picked up a choke that used ferrite donuts built in a plastic tube with PL-259 connectors on either side and inserted it into the feed line. MFJ Enterprises Inc. (Note that they call this a balun as well) It made a huge difference.

I eventually got rid of the Buxcom a few years back in favor of a 3 element SteppIR Yagi.
 

bharvey2

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
1,985
Is the whole antenna inside the PVC pipe or is the balun the only component inside the pipe? If the former, it sounds like a JPole which would present a DC short between the center and ground conductors.
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
bharvey2
Ah! You are correct about that short if you are measuring at DC. The 'length' of that short (bad way of describing it) at AC could be an 'open' instead of a short. Dealing with RF you are dealing with AC so that 'short' isn't a short at all (on that 'J'-pole anyway).
As for that thingy in the PVC pipe, if it's what I think he's talking about, it isn't a balun. It's a choke. Big difference. I've also seen how instead of ferrite donuts in that pipe, the outer shield of the coax was removed and the pipe stuffed with 'steel-wool'. (Never tried it so can't say how it did in comparison to ferrite donuts.) That produced an impedance 'bump' in the feed line that sort of acted like a choke. Remember to seal both ends of that choke pipe...
 
Last edited:

bharvey2

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
1,985
bharvey2
Ah! You are correct about that short if you are measuring at DC. The 'length' of that short (bad way of describing it) at AC could be an 'open' instead of a short. Dealing with RF you are dealing with AC so that 'short' isn't a short at all (on that 'J'-pole anyway).
As for that thingy in the PVC pipe, if it's what I think he's talking about, it isn't a balun. It's a choke. Big difference. I've also seen how instead of ferrite donuts in that pipe, the outer shield of the coax was removed and the pipe stuffed with 'steel-wool'. (Never tried it so can't say how it did in comparison to ferrite donuts.) That produced an impedance 'bump' in the feed line that sort of acted like a choke. Remember to seal both ends of that choke pipe...

The OP described him measurements with a multimeter in a diode check position so That's why I mentioned the DC short. He still hasn't responded to the question about the purpose of the PVC so it isn't clear to me what he has. The ferrites as a common mode choke would make sense if he did have a "JPole in a tube". I have to say I've never heard of using steel wool. If it's a Windom (An OCF dipole as I understand it) then a 4-1 balun might still present as a DC short using the tools he mentioned above. I'd still like to know what he's working with as far as antenna parts.
 

W5lz

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
617
That steel-wool in a tube is not a new idea at all, look at some older Handbooks. Any balun (impedance transformer) will show a short at DC, so will any kind of transformer. Depends on how you do the measuring...
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
If the OP has a Windom style antenna then it has a 4:1 transformer and not a choke. If its a Buxcom brand Windom they sell them with both 4:1 and 6:1 ratios depending on what height you will use the antenna. The transformer could be a balun or an unun depending on the antenna mfr.


bharvey2
Ah! You are correct about that short if you are measuring at DC. The 'length' of that short (bad way of describing it) at AC could be an 'open' instead of a short. Dealing with RF you are dealing with AC so that 'short' isn't a short at all (on that 'J'-pole anyway).
As for that thingy in the PVC pipe, if it's what I think he's talking about, it isn't a balun. It's a choke. Big difference. I've also seen how instead of ferrite donuts in that pipe, the outer shield of the coax was removed and the pipe stuffed with 'steel-wool'. (Never tried it so can't say how it did in comparison to ferrite donuts.) That produced an impedance 'bump' in the feed line that sort of acted like a choke. Remember to seal both ends of that choke pipe...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top