• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

BC396T vs. BC996T

Status
Not open for further replies.

space

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
4
Hi All,

Is the 996T more able to receive weaker signals than the 396T? Or are the two radio's
about the same when it comes to Sensitivity & Selectivity?

Your comments are welcome.

Thanks for your interest.

Greg
 

ROCKnTIME

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
0
Good Question. I’m trying them side by side now using Close Call and so far the BCD396T (Condor antenna) has found three frequencies verse none for the BCD996T (Diamond RH77CA antenna). I’m using the same settings and no squelch.
 

UPMan

Uniden Representative
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
13,287
Location
Arlington, TX
Close Call hits will not be a good way to compare relative sensitivity, since Close Call hits are not directly related to sensitivity but rather the detected noise floor of the band being checked. The noise floor will be dramatically affected by antenna systems (system being antenna + chassis in the case of direct-mount, and the 996 has a significant chassis in comparison to the 396).
 

JHaislet

Member
Joined
May 5, 2006
Messages
220
Location
South Dakota
So would it be possible to put the 396T on a more level playing field by attaching a counterpoise "rat tail" to the base of the antenna on the 396?
 

Al42

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
3,485
Location
Long Island, NY, USA
JHaislet said:
So would it be possible to put the 396T on a more level playing field by attaching a counterpoise "rat tail" to the base of the antenna on the 396?
You'd still be comparing nearfield sensitivity, not scanner sensitivity. Of course, if that's what space was interested in, ignore me. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top