Beginner... CB or Scanner?

Status
Not open for further replies.

p8triotlove

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Messages
4
Hey all - just getting into this and looking at all the options. We have ideas about how a CB radio could fulfill basic info and communication needs in a crisis, but torn because of all the features of the digital radio scanners. What are some opinions of what would be a better bet and/or long term investment?

Thank you!
 

Randyk4661

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
619
Location
Garden Grove, CA
Living here in southern California I would much prefer a scanner over a CB radio should a disaster strike. Many areas are digitally encrypted where I live however there is much I can hear still. Although I am not a ham radio operator I can hear the disaster net repeaters on the scanner. The news media frequencies can also be helpful like it was during the George Floyd protests. Frankly a scanner gets the information to you faster than news media can put it out over the air. Wildland fire evacuations for example.
CB radio is limited in this area and don't expect to hear the most up to date information, more false information than true.
Now where you may live CB radio may play a large part in how people communicate and be quite useful.
In most any area a scanner would be better than CB, however in a remote area CB could be beneficial for a way of communication if phone lines are down assuming other neighbors have CB radios.
You may benefit by having both depending on where you live.
 

Whiskey3JMC

Airwave surfer...Cowabunga!
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
8,721
Location
Philly burbs 🇺🇸
Hi & welcome to the RR forums:
First question that comes to mind is do you plan on transmitting? If not then go with the scanner radio. Without knowing where you live or how active CB is in your area (it's far from what it once was in its heyday) or what's "in the clear" (not encrypted) for you to listen to, it's hard to make a definite recommendation so if you wouldn't mind, could you tell us where you're from? I would not by any means trust it as a primary means of communication in the event of a disaster. I'd suggest pursuing an amateur radio license if you haven't already. If you don't plan on transmitting, get a scanner but do your research on the Radioreference database first to determine what is "in the clear" in your listening area and what scanners can cover what you want to listen to. Good luck with whatever you decide
 

sonm10

Central MN Monitor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
1,080
Location
Sauk Centre, Minnesota
I would go with a scanner. There is so much out there to listen to and gather information than just public safety. I think you might find CB to be frustrating. I have a friend who has gotten into ham radio and is frustrated by the "dead air". With a scanner, you can listen to railroads, ham radio, aviation (civil or military depending upon location), businesses, schools, utilities, as well as your police and fire. There is a LOT of spectrum and unfortunately a lot of people think its just 700/800 MHz. CB limits you to a very narrow portion of it.
 

trap5858

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2003
Messages
907
Location
Doylestown PA & Milton DE
Scanner, CB, Amateur Radio- it seems they all have something to offer. CB was my entry point into all of this 50 years ago and as most things do- one thing leads to another. CB, then scanners (still scanners) then Amateur Radio (Still amateur radio). It is all fun. Pick a starting point, meet people on the air with CB or Amateur Radio, learn here on RR and listen to the world around you. With Amateur Radio you are not limited to your back yard. Ask questions here- the most knowledgeable people in the hobby are as close as your keyboard.
 

bearcatrp

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
3,164
Location
Land of 10,000 taxes
A handheld receiver will benefit you better with its wide coverage of frequencies. A Icom R30 can listen to P25 tier I. Its a little pricey. If you just want analog, a Icom R6 can be found less expensive. A Ham handheld has a wide frequency range also but no P25 (AFAIK) but can transmit in an emergency on the ham bands. Could even get you to get your ham license down the road. You need to decide which is best for you.

 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,203
Location
Southeastern Michigan
I would suggest a scanner first. There is a lot of stuff to listen to, as already mentioned. Many scanner can listen to CB, too, with an appropriate antenna.

A handheld scanner might be the best option, as it is meant to used on the go, and disposable batteries can be used. (Rechargeable batteries for day-to-day use will save you money, but you can get those as money allows.)

Look in the database for your area, and see which frequencies and systems are in use.
 

Ensnared

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
4,614
Location
Waco, Texas
For the most part, the CB is unreliable for accurate information; however, on numerous occasions, I have found ways around road blocks, hazardous weather conditions and even tornados. from truckers

I pair my CB with a Passport Max II & 2) 436HP scanners.

I have read articles, talked to others, and watched videos about the aforementioned Uniden 885. From what I have learned, this radio does not program like the Uniden type II radio scanners. The Uniden 885 is also a bit expensive.

My current squeeze, a $35 Cobra 29, bought across the road from the Joplin 44 Truck Stop, is peaked and has talkback. The Cobra 25, peaked out by a professional radio technician crapped out already.

I love my CB. You can get some of them fairly cheap. Get a good antenna though. Good luck in your choice.
 

ladn

Explorer of the Frequency Spectrum
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 25, 2008
Messages
1,552
Location
Southern California and sometimes Owens Valley
I'll side with the scanner as well. There's a lot more variety of information to be found with a modern scanner. CB is limited to 40 channels and, in most areas, isn't that active or reliable. Many modern scanners will receive the CB frequencies with a suitable antenna.
 

p8triotlove

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Messages
4
Living here in southern California I would much prefer a scanner over a CB radio should a disaster strike. Many areas are digitally encrypted where I live however there is much I can hear still. Although I am not a ham radio operator I can hear the disaster net repeaters on the scanner. The news media frequencies can also be helpful like it was during the George Floyd protests. Frankly a scanner gets the information to you faster than news media can put it out over the air. Wildland fire evacuations for example.
CB radio is limited in this area and don't expect to hear the most up to date information, more false information than true.
Now where you may live CB radio may play a large part in how people communicate and be quite useful.
In most any area a scanner would be better than CB, however in a remote area CB could be beneficial for a way of communication if phone lines are down assuming other neighbors have CB radios.
You may benefit by having both depending on where you live.

Thank you - that helps a lot!
 

p8triotlove

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Messages
4
Thank you everyone for the thoughtful and informative replies. I've opted to go with a scanner to start as it sounds like that will give me most of whatever it is I am looking for, lol. May still end up with a CB at some point, but being in the know is more important to me than transmitting. Thanks again - looking forward to learning a lot!
 

StoliRaz

🇺🇲
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
991
Look into GMRS radio, good to have in an emergency and more widely used than CB is...at least in my area
 

GlobalNorth

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
2,400
Location
Fort Misery
CB/GMRS will be an urban/suburban mess in a natural disaster. Everyone clamoring for frequency space and talking over each other. It may be usable in a rural area or in very small cities or towns. Repeaters may lose power after 24 to 36 hours and then everything is back to simplex only.
 

p8triotlove

Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2021
Messages
4
Something I neglected to mention was I run my base scanners on computer backup power boxes. with just a scanner or two they can run for hours or even days should the power go out for any length of time.
Thank you - VERY good to know!
 

CanesFan95

Analog already is interoperable.
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,353
Location
FL
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top