• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Cantenna?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
5,812
Location
N.E. Kansas
#2
It's a directional waveguide type of antenna used for a wireless USB WiFi device.

I think that a helical antenna works much better and really isn't that much more difficult to build.
 
Last edited:

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
21,675
Location
Bowie, Md.
#4
LOL! I had a good laugh on this one. Talk about remembering old names - the CanTenna was a Heathkit item which was a huge - gallon paint can size, as I recall - dummy load useful for hams testing transmitters safely. 73 Mike
 

KevinGC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2008
Messages
41
Location
Grove City, Ohio USA
#5
Ah Yes, I remember it now. I had a cantenna back in the 70's to go along with my HeathKit HW-101 amateur transceiver. 200W output as I remember. Used the Cantenna to test the rig and tune the finals, etc.
It was a big resistor inside a paint can basically, filled with mineral oil to help dissapate the heat.
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,126
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
#6
Nope, with the Heath Cantenna you had to supply your own oil. If you remember that one you know how to build one of your own, there were plenty of construction articles in ham magazines of the day. My soldering iron mourns the loss of it's job and is now only part time employed.

Footnote;
The wise drilled a small hole in the lid and pushed in a rubber plug. The last thing you want when one heats up and the air at the top expands is a minor explosion and oil all over the place.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
1
#7
old thread

Hey guys, I've been lurking these forums for about a month now but not posting because I'm completely new to this and don't have a whole lot to contribute. I just bought my first scanner (PSR-700) and I love it, but I immedietely became obsessed with ways to increase its range :) I built my first successful 'rabbit ears' tuneable half wave dipole a week ago and it works great!!

The main subject of my post results from the fact that I've been spending a lot of time online reading up on antenna theory, and learning a ton, and also realizing that I've only begun to scratch the surface. My mobile broadband connection is terrible (the only option here in the boonies). In looking for ways to increase my signal using these new tidbits of antenna theory knowledge, I started experimenting with the RG6 coax I had laying around.

I cut a 20oz soda bottle at the bottom and wrapped a random number of turns of coax along the outside (18 turns now that I count), taped it up with duct tape, and ran about 1.5 extra feet out from under the duct tape wrap. I put the USB cable through the neck of the bottle and attached the broadband card inside, then taped the USB cable so that the broadband card is centered inside the bottle. I separated the shield and conductor on one end of the coax that I left hanging out, and cut them to each to 1/4 wavelength for the 850 MHz frequency that the broadband card locks onto at my house (Verizon's channel 770).

I tried hooking the shield and conductor to an indoor UHF TV antenna I had laying around, but it didn't do anything for the 'RSSI'. By accident, I touched the exposed shielding and conductor together, and whoa!! The RSSI went from the normal -102 dbm to -80 dbm !! I twisted them together and can get anywhere from -90 dbm to -78 dbm, depending on the position of the exposed shield + conductor, with a consistent -7 db loss. All background noise seems to be canceled out.

I was thinking of trying to design a 'cantenna' for the twisted end of the exposed coax, but I wonder if I should try the trap design first by connecting the shield and and conductor on both ends of the coax? Would this turn the whole unit into an antenna? Or is the cantenna idea better?

Thanks for any advice.,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top