carlt
Member
I have noticed this week that the dispatcher & units are now referring to "sector" something, instead of "beat" something. Does anyone know the reason and/or have any info on the areas that make up the "sectors"?
"Border" (Division) has nothing to do with beats / sectors.CHP San diego is Border.
a lot of the stops in the hills like that dont really have much traffic. most stops are just reported as to 10-20 but dont always have a license ran so not much radio traffic. but yeah the elcajon office runs off the south zone. so if your in ramona you may not get the south zone very easily. maybe able to hear them through the east zone. but if im not mistaking they have a repeater in that area or even another rcs site that you may need to hear that portion of the chp. not too sure on that. im in el cajon and can get them on both the east and south zones.
Don't forget the CHP handles all traffic enforcement (radar-lazer) and accident reports in unicorporated areas of each county. Just to add to the confusion...
Thanks Scotty! I was thinking the very same thing when I was looking for my map of the CHP beats in Mono County. When I found the map and then started typing I promptly forgot. I know that on National Forest system roads we could have told the CHP to get lost, but we actually welcomed their help. The issue of jurisdiction never came up as it should not have.
Actually it came up twice. I was enroute to a large hot spring that is heavily used by visitors. An earthquake occurred at a shallow depth directly under the area early one morning during a heavy snowstorm. I went into work early, put my skis in the truck and drove down to 395. When I got there the road was closed and a CHP officer was working the roadblock. He told me I could not proceed and asked why I needed to pass. When I told him he looked at me like I was crazy to be out alone on skis in the circumstances. I knew I had to get to the springs before any visitor to make sure they would not be harmed. He told me if I passed he would have to arrest me. I pointed out that this section of 395 was located on National Forest lands and the State of California had an easement from the USFS that states the use and maintenance of the highway cannot interfere with the purposes of National Forest land. I pointed out that I was doing my job and that impeding me amounted to interfering with a federal officer along with mention of the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. I told him I could call up one of our LEO's to arrest him for that. He let me proceed!
I had to have a similar discussion on a fire much later. I pointed out that they could not unilaterally open 395 through the fire area because the incident commander said no. They were discussing this among themselves and sheriff's deputies. I think they were actually going to do it, before I caught wind of it and interceded. I went through the explanation very objectively and pointed out to them that federal law requires them to be under the authority of the IC. After the dust cleared and a month passed I picked up through the grapevine that the CHP was very upset with me. A sheriff's deputy came after me like I had knowingly harassed the CHP and didn't have the right to question them. Sorry, there was no diplomatic way to point out the truth.
Great stories... I love it. Were you in the Fed. vehicle or POV (personal owned veh.) ? ? Also I understand a decade back there was mandatory classes the CHP had to take for basic crime fighting, this way they could handle a call in a rural area until the local sheriff arrived. I also believe their is some mutual aid agreements in effect to liabilities don't come into play.