They signed a contract with EF Johnson to put in a VHF P25 trunked system earlier this year. RFI last year was requesting a VHF P25 Phase 1 (upgradable to Phase II) Simulcast Multi-Site Trunking System that uses 4 Sites and 5 channels.
Pretty sure that will be the first VHF trunked system I've seen. Will be interesting to see how good the reception is inside buildings, etc.
Boulder originally wanted was a VHF simulcast system, but it has been revealed in these latest land use docs related to these towers that they switched to 800 MHz for "better in-building signal penetration and coverage".
It is interesting to hear that they went with EF Johnson, which I believe will be the first time we will see an EF Johnson P25 system in the state.
Proposed sites are:
1) Existing Gunbarrel
2) Folsom Stadium (existing CU site)
3) Arapahoe Utilities (Believe this is the site everyone is up in arms about)
4) Booton Water Tank on Lee Hill
5) Existing Chautauqua Water Tank (want this to be failover site)
Along with the 800 MHz reveal, it appears that the Booton Water Tank site was dropped in favor of a "North Foothills" site because it was a poor choice for propagation. I'm curious on whether it was bad data from their consultant they used for their proposal or their switch from VHF to 800 MHz.
EDIT:
I'm not surprised. The tower will not be built at that location. No matter where they put the tower, there's going to be push-back from NIMBYs. Maybe it will never happen.
Commissioners punt vote on east Boulder communication tower following resident pushback - Boulder Daily Camera
There was no vote on the matter and has been tabled indefinitely. The tower might still be built at that location, but the City will need to do more work to prove that they have absolutely no alternatives out of three potential alternatives they had not fully vetted. This matter could return for a vote if the City is able gather the proof needed.