• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Consultant needed to review our system and move us to P25 Phase II

Status
Not open for further replies.

officerdave

Retired LEO
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
158
Looking for experiences folks on here , might have had with LMR System design consultants. We need a review of our current system, find issues with coverage etc. and then recommend how to upgrade to a Phase II P25 Citywide system. I know of Federal but not many others . Hopefully someone on here has used a solid consultant and can give us some ideas . thanks as always
 

PACNWDude

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
1,444
Phase 2 P25 would include TDMA digital and a common air interface. This can be very manufacturer dependent. That being said, go with whomever your current system is made by. If you are using Motorola, contact Motorola Solutions for an engineered solution. If Kenwood/EF Johnson/Tait/Zetron, I would recommend reaching out to that conglomerate. Harris, contact Harris Communications. P25 standardization is a starting point, with each manufacturer placing their own spin on the product line to lock you into a vendor/manufacturer base. Whomever maintains your current system could probably provide the next step of guidance.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,400
Location
United States
...but I would guess the City needs some " outside" input.

They do.
For small systems, using the manufacturer or vendor can work fine. But if it's a large system, using them can create a lot of issues.
-Purchasing rules may not allow the consultant to bid on the project.
-A vendor is likely going to recommend one brand, which can violate purchasing rules.

If the current system was spec'd/installed by the vendor you plan on using, that can be a problem. They may avoid taking responsibility for any issues.

While a consultant can initially be costly, they often pay for themselves as a non-biased third party that can make decisions based on exactly what you need, not which equipment a vendor is pushed to sell. A consultant can make recommendations that bridge different manufacturers.

I'm currently using a consultant to design a 3 channel multisite system for our PD. It's a lot of money but it's a complex project. He comes with a lot of experience and a lot of tools I don't have. A good consultant will have propagation mapping tools with high accuracy clutter maps that will save you a lot of trial and error.

I'd check with your purchasing department and see what the rules are. Some will let things slide, some will really toe the line. Considering it's taxpayer money that is being spent, there should be some oversight that makes sure that one vendor doesn't get to monopolize things.
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,142
Location
Phoenix, AZ
I work for a large manufacturer (but have worked for dealers and end users as well over the last 25 years). On the systems I have worked, "Tusa" and "Lockard and White" both have been able to set the expectations with the customer and hold the manufacturer's feet to the fire (and all the sub contractors as well). Good luck! TT
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,142
Location
Phoenix, AZ
A big thing I see quite a bit is the vendor will schedule coverage testing in the winter/spring time when there is little Foliage on the trees. This makes the system seem much better than testing during summer when most Foliage is on the trees. Foliage has a significant impact on coverage, especially at 7/800. TT
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,571
Location
Pittsboro IN
Mission critical magazine usually has a top 20 consultants listing every year or 2.
Most of the consultants will advertise in there if you can't find the list in a back issue.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
6,025
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
A big thing I see quite a bit is the vendor will schedule coverage testing in the winter/spring time when there is little Foliage on the trees. This makes the system seem much better than testing during summer when most Foliage is on the trees. Foliage has a significant impact on coverage, especially at 7/800. TT
Ask me how I know. We did coverage ATP in October. In April, areas that passed would later fail. Vendor was supposed to come back for a round two. Because it wasn't in the SOW, it never got completed as vendor stated "sure, we'll be glad to do a post project new order". Get EVERYTHING you want in your SOW. EVERYTHING. and do NOT sign off until EVERYTHING is completed. Vendor will get ghost when you sign on the dotted line.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,571
Location
Pittsboro IN
I worked with a PE who used a vendor whose equipment had some design flaws and was a source of problems for the county and radio shop. They finally said they were going to sue the mfg so said PE reimbursed them to protect the vendor.
Those are the types of things that don't show up in court records making it hard to perform due diligence on consultants.
 

fredva

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
2,292
Location
Virginia/West Virginia
Our county had a bad experience years ago when they didn't use a consultant and let the two competing companies offer bids based on their own internally-developed requirements. The lowest bidder won the contract proposing one less tower than the competition. Guess what the coverage was like when the system went online? For the next radio upgrade, the county hired an independent consultant which set the requirements.
 

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,525
Location
Texas
Our county had a bad experience years ago when they didn't use a consultant and let the two competing companies offer bids based on their own internally-developed requirements. The lowest bidder won the contract proposing one less tower than the competition. Guess what the coverage was like when the system went online? For the next radio upgrade, the county hired an independent consultant which set the requirements.

Reminds me of the story of Abilene, TX. Harris wanted to use the existing towers from the EDACs system and said "it should" cover. Motorola wanted to build three new freestanders in more optimum locations (completely independent of the existing EDACs system) to provide total coverage. City went with the lowest bidder (the one who didn't want to build new towers)...and a few years later ended up having to build a 4th tower to make up coverage gaps. There are still a few minor gaps IIRC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top