• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:

Court case lifts lid on secret post 9/11 flights

Not open for further replies.


Premium Subscriber
Feb 12, 2010
RadioShack West Broad Street
A good read. This article sheds some light on "suspicious" SAM flights, albeit just a handful, I have logged over the years. I was always somewhat confused when I logged a SAM flight and I was able to track the tail number to a civilian ownership group. Strangely (?) enough the ownership group always appeared to be located out of Danbury CT. Again, without going through my logs I have only captured 4 or 5 tops.

If this question has already been addressed, my apologies. Related to 9-11 did anyone ever get a positive ID on the A/C circling at low altitude the White House shortly after the Pentagon strikes?

Last edited:
Not open for further replies.