CPD Fake 10-1 (CPD's Officer Needs Help)

Status
Not open for further replies.

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,168
Location
Chicago , IL

I hate to say it, but with all the anti-police sentiment out there, and accessibility to information to interfere with Police and Fire Communications, the days of Mom & Pop sitting in the front room with the desktop scanner on an end table just listening are a distant memory.

Why are they encrypting? Well....here you go.
 

GTO_04

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,940
Location
Noblesville, IN

I hate to say it, but with all the anti-police sentiment out there, and accessibility to information to interfere with Police and Fire Communications, the days of Mom & Pop sitting in the front room with the desktop scanner on an end table just listening are a distant memory.

Why are they encrypting? Well....here you go.

Was this not a conventional analog system that was breached? Maybe I'm missing something, but they don't have to go to an encrypted system to prevent this from happening again. It would be very difficult for this to happen on a P25 system that is in the clear. They would have to have a P25 capable radio that has the right programming template in it. He would just about have to steal a police radio.

GTO_04
 

217

Sporadic E enthusiast
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
391
Location
North Carolina
Was this not a conventional analog system that was breached? Maybe I'm missing something, but they don't have to go to an encrypted system to prevent this from happening again. It would be very difficult for this to happen on a P25 system that is in the clear. They would have to have a P25 capable radio that has the right programming template in it. He would just about have to steal a police radio.

GTO_04
A spokesman for the City’s Office of Management and Communications told NBC 5 the call actually came in via telephone.
 

ratl

Newbie
Joined
Sep 2, 2019
Messages
1
Perhaps this is a clarification:

Chicago Man Charged With Phony Distress Call – NBC Chicago

...

A 10-1 is the most attention-getting call on police radios. It means an officer is in trouble and needs immediate assistance. The problem was, no officer had made such a call. And almost immediately, officers at the scene began questioning the response.

"Who called it out?" one officer asked.

"We got a ticket," the dispatcher responded. "It came over as a battery that just occurred, then a 10-1."

"Who called the 10-1?" the officer pressed. "Who called that?"

"It was sent over by a call-taker," the dispatcher replied.

"Was there an off-duty officer?" the field officer asked. "Is there a description?"

Shortly after that conversation, the dispatcher sent out a message telling officers to disregard the distress call. And minutes later, another officer radioed in to say he had found the source of the 10-1: Marcus Sanders, who he said was in possession of a police-style radio.

"He called this in for the 10-1," the officer said. "He's got his own little police radio."

After that, the story grew confusing. Arresting officers said Sanders told them he used the radio to make the call. But a spokesman for the City's Office of Management and Communications told NBC 5 the call actually came in via telephone.

Whatever the case, Sanders was arrested, and charged with making the false report, as well as being in possession of the radio, and a failure to register as a sex offender from a previous case.
--------------

Maybe not so clear after all.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,168
Location
Chicago , IL
Was this not a conventional analog system that was breached? Maybe I'm missing something, but they don't have to go to an encrypted system to prevent this from happening again. It would be very difficult for this to happen on a P25 system that is in the clear. They would have to have a P25 capable radio that has the right programming template in it. He would just about have to steal a police radio.

GTO_04

Yes it did, but unfortunately, "listening" isn't the only issue. As I've mentioned many times, when a Twitter feed is tweeting out sensitive information that they're monitoring, you can put a check mark in that box too. I'm following about half a dozen Tweeters that do the same thing. When the CPD Marine Unit puts out "in the clear" on the P25 Trunking system, "this is so and so that's been missing we just plucked out of the water", then within 30 seconds a Tweet is posted with that information, and a link to the missing person's story, picture etc., with commentary...well, the writing was on the wall, and TGID 5091 became encrypted by the next morning. That same Tweeter posted when the Mayor's children (Daley), movements...then the writing is on the wall and the Talkgroup was encrypted within two days. I have read DuComm is on the bubble about doing the same thing, and I'm sure it'll take one sensitive incident posted, and the encryption bug will infest. Unfortunately we can't have that "conversation" in regards to how and why this hobby has changed for the worst on RR. I would like to know what motivates someone sitting at home that hears a domestic disturbance call, and puts the address and narrative from the dispatched event on Twitter. The kids are driving now, and they're wrecking the hobby.

Just to add to this, "delayed Tweets" are starting to be sent out utilizing the OEMC's Broadcastify feed of encrypted zones. When that feed goes off-line, remember this post because you read it here first.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top