• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Dallas police, firefighters frustrated with automated dispatch system

Status
Not open for further replies.

Firetxmi

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
309
Dallas police, firefighters frustrated with automated dispatch system

08:08 AM CDT on Sunday, March 9, 2008

By TANYA EISERER / The Dallas Morning News
teiserer@dallasnews.com

Dallas emergency workers say they're facing a new menace: their computers.

Many believe public safety is at risk because of numerous problems related to the installation of a sophisticated new emergency dispatch system. According to interviews and documents obtained by The Dallas Morning News:

• Firefighters have been sent to wrong addresses or dispatched to emergency scenes when other firefighters are closer.

• Emergency workers have been inadvertently notified that they don't have to go to an emergency call when help is needed.

• Police officers on patrol have received incorrect information on people's criminal records or outstanding arrest warrants.

• Correct information for police about whether a suspect is a wanted criminal sometimes arrives long after a person who was being questioned has been allowed to leave a scene.

"If someone hasn't died yet, then they will," said Jim Crump, a 24-year Dallas Fire-Rescue veteran. "It's a roulette wheel spinning. ... The people of Dallas have a right to know that their system is broke."

There are no known incidents of deaths or serious injuries related to the dispatch problems. But the nearly $6 million system that went online in August appears to be at the center of numerous difficulties.

Many of the new dispatch problems are related to the system's Achilles' heel: a patchwork software link between the city's older hardware, such as the computers in police cars, firetrucks and ambulances, to the newer dispatch system under City Hall.

Human error also may have increased as dispatchers, police and firefighters struggle with what they say is a cumbersome and often slow system.

City officials say they're working on fixes for many of the problems.

"We don't deny that there are issues, because there are," First Assistant City Manager Ryan Evans said. "But we are absolutely committed to addressing all of them."

Public safety concerns

Mr. Crump, the son of a retired Dallas firefighter and brother of a Dallas police officer, said he chose to talk publicly about the problems because of serious public safety concerns.

Documents show that firefighters have reported that the speakers at their stations – which are supposed to let them know that they need to respond to an emergency – sometimes do not work correctly with the new automated dispatch system.

Sometimes, the speakers at the wrong station go off, causing delayed responses to as many as 20 to 30 emergencies per day, according to fire department documents.

That's a major concern for firefighters such as Mr. Crump, who said what happened Feb. 25 at his station has become common: He says his station received two calls on the emergency-only red phone from someone at fire dispatch letting them know that they had been sent on emergency calls.

The phone calls were needed because the dispatch system had not notified firefighters of the emergencies through the fire station's loudspeakers. Precious minutes had been lost.

Neither call ended up being a serious problem, but Mr. Crump said it's the "what if" that scares him.

But Worris Levine, the city's director of communication and information services, said the dispatch system is not the source of that problem. He said the dispatch system is sending the information to the speaker system, but the speakers aren't activating. "We don't know what that is yet," he said.

He said he did not see it as a public safety concern because dispatchers can simply notify firefighters if they don't respond. "We're talking about seconds," he said.

Lingering problems

Although the city says it has teams of workers focused on the dispatch system, many of the problems have continued unabated since the city flipped the switch on the new computer-aided dispatch system at 4:15 a.m. Aug. 22.

The transition got off to a rough start, despite the statements in a City Hall news release soon after the rollout that there had been only a "few minor problems" that didn't affect public safety.

Some are seemingly mundane, with once-simple tasks on in-car computers now taking four or five steps to complete. Officers on patrol struggled to file reports, a problem that, early on, necessitated a massive effort to reprogram nearly every computer.

But writing reports on in-car computers remains "a very slow process," Officer David Baures wrote to police officials. "Is this going to be improved or are we stuck with this slow, inefficient 'new' computer?"

At various times, police have been reduced to writing reports by hand.

Other problems eat up untold man-hours, such as the frequent lag time between when a dispatcher assigns a police officer a call and when the information reaches in-car computers.

Finding out if someone is wanted by police, or driving a stolen car, has became tedious and time-consuming, whereas accessing such information had previously been nearly instantaneous.

Senior Cpl. Keith Huber, a member of the police special investigations unit, wrote to police officials in November that he had requested a records check through his in-car computer to see if a man had any outstanding arrest warrants. The computer initially said the man was not wanted. Minutes later, it notified him that the man actually had multiple outstanding warrants.

It was too late: Officers had let him go.

On Feb. 25, Senior Cpl. Christopher Wagner arrested a man after catching him with crack cocaine and a crack pipe. When he tried to check to see if the man had outstanding warrants, nothing came back telling him one way or another.

Once at the jail, he determined that the man was wanted for a parole violation for burglary.

"He's on parole until 2025," said Cpl. Wagner, who works on a crime response team in some of Dallas' toughest neighborhoods, including those in West Dallas.

"We were out there for 20 to 25 minutes talking to this guy, not knowing who this guy was," he said. "It's real dangerous. Parole violators are some of the most dangerous people we deal with because they don't want to go back to the penitentiary."

The current overall situation confronting officers is "unacceptable at all levels," Deputy Chief Nancy Kirkpatrick, commander of the communications division, said in an interview with The News. "On the major issues that officers have, there has not been a significant improvement."

City officials did not create a team to address the records-check issues until November. Mr. Levine said that many of the records-check problems would be fixed soon.

Mixing old and new

In addition to human error related to the sheer complexity of the new dispatch system, city documents blame some of the problems – such as emergency vehicles being improperly dispatched – on the way the new system links to older equipment.

When the city decided to replace its 35-year-old homegrown emergency dispatch system with the new automated one made by San Diego-based TriTech, a money-saving decision was made not to buy the mobile software system that allows the computers in emergency vehicles to easily communicate with the dispatch system at City Hall.

Instead of spending millions on new software and hardware for emergency workers, the city opted to build a bridge between old and new for about $640,000.

"It's always difficult; you're bringing in brand-new sophisticated software on top of something that wasn't built to be integrated with this kind of software," said Chris Maloney, president of TriTech. "You're trying to shoehorn it with this great new CAD [computer-aided dispatch] system that wasn't built to work with it."

Experts say building an interface between two software products as Dallas did is a bit like asking a person who speaks only Chinese to speak to a person who speaks only Italian. Someone has to translate, and often something gets lost in translation – especially if the translator isn't very good at his job, as seems to be the case with the Dallas computer interface.

"Those pieces, your mobile piece and your [dispatch] software, are pretty much connected at the hip," said Joseph Hindman, a police technology expert who works for the Scottsdale, Ariz., Police Department. "They have to talk to each other."

Mr. Levine, Dallas' top information technology official, said that the interface is working as it should and that the city made the decision to keep the existing in-car software as an "interim decision" to minimize the amount of change for police officers and firefighters.

Dallas officials now are considering buying TriTech's mobile software. Records show that project could cost almost $10 million, including $3.7 million for the software and related expenses and about $5.8 million to replace 510 mobile computers.

Meanwhile, frustrated emergency workers are coping as best as they can. One police officer expressed his frustrations in a Feb. 28 police report: "The CAD system is twice as slow as the old system that it replaced. ... If the people who decided to buy the CAD system had to use it, we might not be having these problems."

GLITCHES IN THE DISPATCH

A sampling of problems related to the installation of Dallas' new emergency dispatch system:

• Emergency vehicles are assigned to calls, but then the call is rescinded by a "ghost clear" glitch as it is en route to the location, leaving the emergency call unanswered until the error is caught and someone is reassigned to the call.

• When officers try to check license plates or look for outstanding arrest warrants, the information is often slow to get to in-car computers.

• Location information for emergency vehicles is sometimes slow to update, causing the system to show emergency vehicles at one location when they're really elsewhere.

• The dispatch system shows that emergency vehicles have arrived at a scene when they have not. Or emergency vehicles arrive, but the system does not show it. Emergency workers say this distorts the reporting of accurate response times.

• Officers can no longer send out divisionwide or citywide messages – such as be-on-the-lookout "BOLO" alerts. Such messages now go to police dispatchers who find them only by checking their e-mail, and then they are relayed.

• The in-car interface with the dispatch system is generally cumbersome. One top-ranking city technology official wrote in a memo how she saw an officer get 37 separate messages about a single emergency as he raced with lights on and sirens blaring to help another officer. "To read the comments, he would have had to use keystrokes and fine motor skills," wrote Lynn Chaffin. "Not Good. Not Safe."

SOURCE: City of Dallas records
Link:http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/030908dnmetdpdcomputers.1828fac.html

Note: Cool pics of the dispatch center on the page.

Every town that I know of that has gone to automated dispatch has had similar problems. I just can't image it on a scale like DPD and DFD are working with.
 

SCPD

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
65,126
Location
Virginia
Dallas Police Scanner listeners are JUST as frustrated as them! I can't ever seem to rember what a Tango element is from a Foxtrot element.
 

Firetxmi

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
309
What is a Foxtrot unit by the way?

I remember when they first rolled it out, what a cluster f*** that was! It still gives them so many problems. Everyones nerves seem to be a little more on edge. I do have to say it is kind of funny to hear a dispatcher and a police officer snipe at each other over the radio.
 

SCPD

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
65,126
Location
Virginia
Tango's are Traffic I believe, I want to say Foxtrot's are Covert-Deployment or maybe even Taskforce.
 

N5AMS

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
199
Location
Houston,Tx.
Houston FD uses the automated system and i hate it still 2 yrs later can't understand that computer vioce i can imagine what DFD is going through
 

bownasterm

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
132
Plano seems to have the automated voice dispatch system under control...they do occasional have double dispatches/messed up ones but i think that while the voice is the same in dallas and plano they use different cad's

i could be wrong though....
 

Firetxmi

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
309
It is still hard to understand street names in Plano though. Thats why the Predators are helpful. I remember when they first started using the CAD though they (Plano) were having problems with it.

DPD seem to have bigger problems with the new dispatch system than DFD does, just from what I hear.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
662
Location
Stinkadena, TX
ASILLER81 said:
Houston FD uses the automated system and i hate it still 2 yrs later can't understand that computer vioce i can imagine what DFD is going through
Dallas, Plano, Austin (and Fort Worth? haven't personally listened to it) use a "robot" built by Locution Systems. It isn't great, but the voice sounds about a thousand times more intelligible than the "robot" HFD uses. Northrop-Grumman or one of the other big military contractors was the vendor for the city of Houston's system, so God only knows where their text-to-speech software came from.
 

mbstone99

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,261
Location
Hamilton, Ontario
HFD Automated

JoshW said:
Dallas, Plano, Austin (and Fort Worth? haven't personally listened to it) use a "robot" built by Locution Systems. It isn't great, but the voice sounds about a thousand times more intelligible than the "robot" HFD uses. Northrop-Grumman or one of the other big military contractors was the vendor for the city of Houston's system, so God only knows where their text-to-speech software came from.
Maybe its an old IBM PC with a software text to speech program. *grins*

Matt
 

Russell

Texas DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,507
Location
Dallas (and Austin) Texas
One major problem is the insistence of some "militant" dispatchers demanding that officers "clear themselves" or perform some other task on the car computer when it is obvious that the officer has his/her hands full. The last thing an officer standing on the freeway or sitting a on suspect needs to do is go back to the car to hit some button on a PC that isn't working as well as it used to. It seems that some dispatchers can not tell or co not care that an officer is not is a good position to get to the car computer. These dispatchers should be retrained or given their outright release. There are many good dispatchers on DPD that really know how to do the job, but there are some who insist on forcing the officer to use his/her PC instead of actually doing police work.

Russell
 

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
6,120
Location
Dallas, TX
Russell said:
One major problem is the insistence of some "militant" dispatchers demanding that officers "clear themselves" or perform some other task on the car computer when it is obvious that the officer has his/her hands full. The last thing an officer standing on the freeway or sitting a on suspect needs to do is go back to the car to hit some button on a PC that isn't working as well as it used to. It seems that some dispatchers can not tell or co not care that an officer is not is a good position to get to the car computer. These dispatchers should be retrained or given their outright release. There are many good dispatchers on DPD that really know how to do the job, but there are some who insist on forcing the officer to use his/her PC instead of actually doing police work.

Russell
Russell,
In many cases, you're absolutely correct. However, I have a suspicion that a fair percentage of this behavior is their instructed adherence to the party line. In other words, directions filtered down from the city manager that the officers should be able to do this themselves, i.e. therefore you must not do it for them.

On the Dallas Fire-Rescue side, you hear much the same thing, but I also get the feeling that there is a shortage of dispatchers on that side of the wall. They eliminated at least one position (per shift) when the automated 'Debbie Dispatch' started clearing her simulated vocal chords. You hear many more calls from fire/ems equipment for more information when they cannot locate the supposed incident, only to get a response from '660' to have the "Rescue", or the Battallion Chief, somebody other than dispatch, try the callback number. They're apparently too short handed to do it from 660. If they've been instructed not to, then whoever made that decision needs to be booted out the door, along with the ones on the PD side that sit back & lump multiple, widely separated, calls together, call them one incident, then clear it to make their stats look good. (Yep, happens all the time.)
 

Russell

Texas DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,507
Location
Dallas (and Austin) Texas
hiegtx said:
Russell,
In many cases, you're absolutely correct. However, I have a suspicion that a fair percentage of this behavior is their instructed adherence to the party line. In other words, directions filtered down from the city manager that the officers should be able to do this themselves, i.e. therefore you must not do it for them. ...
Yes, I agree. I'm sure there is tons of political/command pressure. They just spent millions of dollars and want the to "the system" to work. As always, this is a question of balance and at some point "resonable" should figure into equation. The "system" extends all the way to out to the boots on the ground and the entire system must work well or lives are at risk and our tax dollars have been wasted (again). It is much easier on everybody for the guy in the street to hit his 'en route' buttton or 'out at the scene' button, but there's more than one way to skin a cat and if an officer acknowledges or clears over his radio then that should be okay, too. You also can't stop in the middle of a pursuit to read your email or send a message on the computer. Like I said "balance". Let's focus on getting the job done and not on the process. These people are in the public safety business not the process business. The purpose of Public Safety is Public Safety not exercising a process for the sake of the process.

Russell
 
Last edited:

SCPD

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
65,126
Location
Virginia
I listen to DPD Channel's 2 & 6, with the Non-Dispatch channels of 8 & 12. and almost no Fire. the Guy that handles Northeast during the Day will either Clear elements or "politely" ask them how they want to be cleared and do it. Same goes for the Old Night dispatcher for 2 thats now on 6. I think Ch-2 has one other female dispatcher thats cool about clearing and assigning elements to/from calls. The rest of them, we I an element, I'd knock them over the head with the MDC. Militant is an under-statement!

The CAD or Automated DFD robot is about annoying, especially on Texas Fire-1, How many times does it have to give the address? I'd guess 2 is enough. No, that thing is as nutty as the Bonham Police Dispatcher (If you listen to Bonham you KNOW who I'm talking about)

Just out of curosity, is DSO planning to go to this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top