• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Discrepancies Between RR and Scan Chattanooga

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
65,126
Location
Virginia
#1
There are several listings which have more or less frequencies for the same states, counties and towns. I suppose RR is more accurate? More up to date?
 

mciupa

Member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
6,761
#2
With hundreds of Tennesse monitors on this site and the freq.'s that they submit to the DB and discuss in their regional forum , I would definetly say RR is the most up to date and accurate web site.

Scan Chattanooga was last updated Dec. 28 th , 2007

On the other hand , RR last updated Hamilton County and Chattanooga
Feb. 16 , 2008.

Always check here first. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top