DMR Signal - No Voice Heard on DSD+

Status
Not open for further replies.

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
I am trying to listen in to a local utility company (WNH) who use a single DMR frequncy.

Using DSD+ fastlane, I've programmed the frequency into CC and I can see the green line become active when I assume there is a transmission. This coincides with a line popping up on the white line where the vertical frequncy placeholder is. DSD+ is run through a 1R.bat configuration. and the role is set as passive monitor. Raw Source audio monitoring is set to 0 (never monitor); Output is to my speakers with all digital voice synthesized; all protocols decoded; normal handling of group and private voice calls.

We I see the activity in the scope, I assume there's a transmission, but I get nothing.

I also have an SDS100 with DMR upgrade with the same frequencies copied over into a favourites list. I never hear anything, but I see when the talkgroup ID locks on with the text id, the slot #1 appears and I have full signal strength indicated. Utilities services is ON.

Is there something about the system I'm missing? Or have I the wrong settings in both monitors?
 

sonm10

Central MN Monitor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
1,046
Location
Sauk Centre, Minnesota
I too am a fairly new DSD+ FL user. It maybe the signal gain is too high or too low. Use 'j' to decrease or shift 'j' to increase and watch the spectrum analyzer.
 

cg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2000
Messages
4,859
Location
Connecticut
If it isn't trunked, you don't need to run it as such. You can use -r1 but since it is the default, you don't need to have it in the batch file. If you use the menu, check the combined option You should see the protocol show up at the bottom and activity at the top of the Event Log window and see S1 and/or S2 in the Channel activity window.

Gain is g/G but isn't likely the issue.
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
Hi folks, my apologies for not acknowledging your contributions. Got caught up in life ...
Here's a screenie of my DSD+ FL working on WNH 169.4850. I can honestly say I'm not sure if I have this set up right.
Control is set as Combined CC/VC Monitor andoutput is set to synthesize all digital voice.

I've been watching my SDS100 when it stops on this frequency. It holds on the frequency, the signal bars illuminate, and there is a rapid flickering between DMR and CAP+.

It should be a strong signal as it's a utility with a large service area.

wnh.JPG
 

Forts

Mentor
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
6,890
Location
Ontario, Canada
Well.... your volume in DSD+ is cranked way down, but other than that everything looks ok. Would need to see what's happening with a signal present, or, ideally... make a recording of the raw signal (press r in the DSD+ window to start/stop recording). Then we could take a closer look and see what's up.
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
Thanks Forts, I'll see what I can do. I haven't seen a signal presence in a long time which has led me to believe I had configured something wrong. And then how I can't pick up anything on my radio using the RR database has me fearing that the database is off or there is something unique about the service.
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
Hi U2Brent ... I suppose anything is possible. But I do recall at one time having heard voice traffic on these freqs with DSD+, but that was a while ago. They could have changed things since then. I've only recently returned to DSD+ to monitor this after failing to do so with my radio. I thought I could pick up on something different than what RR was showing. I'm assuming DSD+ would show a transmission being encrypted?
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,147
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
Yes, there would be an indication of encryption if there was voice traffic occurring.
It looks like the system on the RRDB page (which indicates conventional DMR signals) may be incorrect or has changed since the submission.
Your screenshot shows a DMR Tier 3 system which is a type of trunking. There is a good chance there are other frequencies involved that have not been discovered yet, So your puzzle may need more pieces added in order for DSD+FL to follow it properly. Of course; If there is little to no traffic to observe on the system, It could take a while to figure out what pieces are missing from the equation and how they fit together. That second frequency listed on the DB page may be a piece of that puzzle.
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
u2Brent, how are you determining its a DMR TIII system from my screenshot? Just curious.
I did a TAFL search for Waterloo North Hydro, and this is what came up ...
Search Results
Not really sure what to do with this information.
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,147
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
Ohh ... OK. So now it's all starting to add up. It's not as simple as just a conventionl DMR system. Tier 3 systems can pretty tough to figure out right?
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,147
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
Yes, Exactly.. (y)
There are generally more frequencies and variables (LSN/LCN) involved with a trunking system.. As opposed to a single conventional DMR frequency.. There needs to be proper data in the DSD frequencies file, as well as the translation to programming the scanner..

I'd concentrate some effort on the third frequency down on your list.
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WATERLOO, ERB ST. WEST REPEATER169.4857K60FXEXT12.832961843.44222222-80.58361111
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WOOLWICH TWP & WATERLOO170.895169.4857K60FXEXT17.653410543.54166667-80.51083333
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WATERLOO, ERB ST. WEST REPEATER172.567K60FXEXT12.8329605043.44222222-80.58361111
 
Last edited:

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
So, I'll go into DSD+ and set up a TIII system, but I still don't think I have enough info to start that.
I know the protocol (TIII), but not the networkID or the arealength for the networks file. I had been monitoring another local Tier 3 system, and it's network line has a value of 5 between the "Network Name" and the arealength value. I don't know what it represents, so I can with all truth claim I don't know what this value would be for this system.

I am certain of only one frequency for the frequency file (169.485), I suspect the siteNumber will be 1.1, don't know what the OTAchannelnumber is.
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
Thanks BM ... is the LCN the same as the OTAchannelnumber that is needed in the frequency line?
 

rkillins

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
Messages
320
I'd concentrate some effort on the third frequency down on your list.
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WATERLOO, ERB ST. WEST REPEATER169.4857K60FXEXT12.832961843.44222222-80.58361111
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WOOLWICH TWP & WATERLOO170.895169.4857K60FXEXT17.653410543.54166667-80.51083333
Waterloo North Hydro Inc.WATERLOO, ERB ST. WEST REPEATER172.567K60FXEXT12.8329605043.44222222-80.58361111

Should I be looking for a control channel? A constant carrier? I know on my other TIII system DSD+ reports quite a bit of info in the Event log including current network, current site, and the system date and time. Should I expect similar with this?
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,147
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
I don't know if a CAP Max system has a constant control channel like CON+ or moves around like CAP+ with a rest channel, I have no experience with that specific type, I've yet to come across and receive one personally.
Hopefully somebody here can answer that for us both, I did a bit of searching but failed to find an answer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top