DSD+ 2.98 source

[SQ4IOE]

Hi Gentlemen,
I need DSD+ 2.98 or newer, Can someone share the software? because the link to DSD+ 2.98 does not work, I am asking

 

[Forts]

DSD+ Fastlane is a paid software, it's not free. I think you will have a hard time finding someone willing to give their copy away.

 

[PDXh0b0]

At the end of your link change p298.zip to p395.zip

 

[SQ4IOE]

but i don't have the link, can you give it to me?

 

[Forts]

Have you paid for Fastlane? If so just email the devs and they will send you a link.

 

[mtindor]

but i don't have the link, can you give it to me?

If you paid for Fast Lane, do what @Forts said -- email dsdplusfastlane@gmail.com (from the email address you originally signed up). And, when you get a link from the author, do NOT delete it. You need to keep your DSDPlus Fast Lane emails.

 

[SQ4IOE]

Thanks a lot for the information, I didn't pay, I don't have a PayPail account , I read that only PayPail can pay, I can't pay for DSDplus

 

[mtindor]

Thanks a lot for the information, I didn't pay, I don't have a PayPail account , I read that only PayPail can pay, I can't pay for DSDplus

Ok, well in your case you are limited to the ancient version available on https://www.dsplus.com . If you currently have something newer than DSDPlus that is on the dsdplus.com website, somebody gave it to you and you're cheating the author

 

[RaleighGuy]

@SQ4IOE even if you do get the link the zip file you download is password protected, you will not be able to install it. Additionally, RR Forums does not allow requests for or sharing of paid software.

 

[SQ4IOE]

I use 2.71, I found it on the Internet, I was interested in this program, and I want it, $ 25 is cheap for me, I don't want to cheat the author, I wrote to DSDplus about the problem that I don't have a PayPail account, but DSDplus has nothing to do with me writes back

 

[dave3825]

So you emailed them, have you checked your spam folder? They may have replied.

 

[SQ4IOE]

I sent an email to DSD+, I always check spam, so silence for now, DSD doesn't write anything to me, I'll be waiting. And tell me, does the new DSD give more information than 2.71? Does the new DSD show basic encryption, does the new dsd show extended encryption?, does the new dsd show RAS access?

 

[mtindor]

I use 2.71, I found it on the Internet, I was interested in this program, and I want it, $ 25 is cheap for me, I don't want to cheat the author, I wrote to DSDplus about the problem that I don't have a PayPail account, but DSDplus has nothing to do with me writes back

@dave3825 has a good point. If you email dsdplusfastlane@gmail.com and don't get a response, you need to check your spam folder.

 

[Forts]

I sent an email to DSD+, I always check spam, so silence for now, DSD doesn't write anything to me, I'll be waiting. And tell me, does the new DSD give more information than 2.71? Does the new DSD show basic encryption, does the new dsd show extended encryption?, does the new dsd show RAS access?

It will show the algorithm in use, it will show if RAS is in use. If you are asking does it show a key value, that's a definite no. DSD+ is not hacking software.

 

[mtindor]

I sent an email to DSD+, I always check spam, so silence for now, DSD doesn't write anything to me, I'll be waiting. And tell me, does the new DSD give more information than 2.71? Does the new DSD show basic encryption, does the new dsd show extended encryption?, does the new dsd show RAS access?

As mentioned, you aren't to get any key information for encrypted data, and it does not decrypt anything. But it will show the encryption type. I think the latest version (in some cases) will show more P25/DMR message types, and supports more LRRP types.

 

[kb9mwr]

@SQ4IOE Additionally, RR Forums does not allow requests for or sharing of paid software.

Funny how they have always overlooked the fact the dsdplus author is capitalizing off the AMBE patent holders. Somehow that is okay.

 

[PDXh0b0]

Funny how they have always overlooked the fact the dsdplus author is capitalizing off the AMBE patent holders. Somehow that is okay.

Wonder how much dvs gave Fujimura's family after they pounced on his work when the patent expired... patents are all about lawyers and theft

 

[mtindor]

Funny how they have always overlooked the fact the dsdplus author is capitalizing off the AMBE patent holders. Somehow that is okay.

Funny how you can’t prove that and you can only assume it.

M

 

[kb9mwr]

Funny how you can’t prove that and you can only assume it.

M

I think fact that the dsd+ author remains anonymous is all the proof anyone needs. There would be no need to hide if it was a legit arrangement. I am not the rights holder, so I don't have to prove anything. And I would not be caught dead buying/supporting this bootleg garbage.

 

[Magnus_P25]

If it was a clean reverse engineering effort then DVSI can go pound sand. So unless he used stolen code he's perfectly within his rights.