• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:

Duck Lake State Park on TG 3312

Not open for further replies.


Dec 19, 2002
Hooper, Weber County, Utah
I just returned from a visit with my mom in Whitehall and while I was there I logged a lot of traffic on the Muskegon State Park TG 3312. Duck Lake State Park was on this TG with a lot of traffic to Muskegon State Park, but I never did hear Duck Lake on its own TG. As Duck Lake and Muskegon State Parks are only a few miles from each other, I'm Thinking that Muskegon State Park also runs Duck Lake State Park. Can any one confrim this and Should the Data base show for TG 3312 both Muskegon and Duck Lake State Park?

Thanks for any info and I hope next summer to have some more time to scan these two parks.

Not open for further replies.