• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

E Hanover/Chatham Fire/EMS question....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Messages
2,988
Location
Fortified Bunker
#1
Just trying to confirm some frequencies....

I'm showing Chatham Fire and Chatham Rescue Squad being dispatched on 154.310 PL 179.9. I also have Harding Fire listed on this frequency for dispatching.

I'm showing East Hanover Fire and EMS being dispatched in 158.940 PL 127.3 and ther operations on 154.4375R PL 127.3.

When I previously lived in Morris County, Chatham Fire and EMS was using 156.150R PL 114.8 for their operations. This channel was shared with Harding Fire and Harding PD (and the cops hated that I might add). The RR database now shows Chatham Emergency Squad using the same frequency as East Hanover 154.4375...same PL and all.

So did they switch ? Are both corps. now using the same Ops reepater but get dispatched on different frequencies. Did fire move or stay ? Any help appreciated.
 

SCPD

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
65,126
Location
Virginia
#3
E Hanover uses 154.4375 PL 127.3. Chantham does not. When Chatham Emergency Squad responds to Chatham Boro they use 155.445 PL 114.8.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top