• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

Effects of Series Connecting Two Different Types of 50 Ohm Coax Cable

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
1
#1
Is there any problem in series connecting two different types of 50 ohm coax cable?
As an example I have 25 feet of RG-8\U. I need to extend the length to an antenna
75 feet away. I want to use 50 feet of LMR-400 connected in series with the RG-8\U
to reach the antenna. Both are 50 ohm but they are constructed differently and have
different velocity factors, etc. Would this cause reflected energy and a higher SWR at the
connection point? Or any other problems.

My current application is 10 meter 28MHz. However I may want to use VHF 145MHz
and UHF 440 MHz dual band in the future. Money is a factor so I want to utilize as
much of what I have on hand.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
10,211
Location
Point Nemo.
#2
No, not really.

In industry, we do this all the time. I've got a site where I have a 200 foot run of 1 5/8" Heliax from the equipment room to the top of the tower.
At the transmitter, I'm using 3/8" helix super flex. From the transmit combiner to the 1 5/8" Heliax, I'm using 1/2" heliax superflex.

At the top of the tower, the 1 5/8" stops and switches to 1/2" heliax again to connect to the antenna.

Pretty common to have different types of cable along the run. Usually the very low loss stuff used in the higher frequencies, 800MHz, Cellular, etc. is not very flexible. Using short lengths of a more flexible cable at the ends is pretty much standard.

There will probably be a small impedance "bump" at the connection, but it shouldn't cause you any issues.

For the heck of it, why don't you price out a 75 foot run of LMR-400, though? While it won't make a huge difference, it does remove a possible failure/water intrusion point, and will probably only cost a few more bucks.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
3,187
Location
So Cali
#3
mmckenna has a good point. I would go with a new run of genuine LMR400 or Davis buryflex. Be sure to get the correct connectors for the LMR series cable.

You can use the RG 8 cable for another project.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#4
The fewer adapters and conversions you have in your coax, the better. The RG-8/U is fine for CB, but it's pretty lossy in UHF. I'd go LMR-400 or similar for the entire run. There's not much difference in the CB freqs, but in UHF the difference can be over 6dB.
 
Joined
Mar 5, 2014
Messages
134
Location
West Virginia
#5
I'm running a 120' of LMR 400UF coax and used a barrel connector, and added 50' of RG 213 coax to my G5RV to reach the shack, so far no problems with it, been using this about 6 months so far........my tuner tunes the dipole on 10-80m, no problem...
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
8,884
Location
PA
#6
At 30MHz and below, the type of coax matters much less. But when you're talking UHF, the differences are huge. At 445MHz, 100' of RG-8X has over 8dB of loss, while LMR-400 has less than 3dB of loss. At 30MHz, the losses are 1.66dB and 0.677dB respectively.

Coax Calculator
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top