crayon said:
If someone is able to install an NMO mount or a lip NMO mount, I would think that they would take the pains to install a glass mount antenna correctly. In this
thread, (and skypilot007 in this thread) several people saw an increase in performance after *switching* from a glass mount antenna to a mounted antenna.
But was it the same antenna on a different mount, or a different antenna?
My 2/70s, whether mounted on an NMO in the center of the roof, or on the glass mount at the top or the rear window, show very little difference. (Not "better performance", which is pretty subjective - measured 0.5db difference from the same mobile position [the car didn't move during the antenna move] to the same
distant base transmitting antenna - distant enough that the quieting could be measured for both positions.)
I do not work in a professional radio shop
I've owned 2 of them.
If law enforcement and businesses will take the time to install a non-glass mount antenna, then I belive anybody who is interested in max performance would be following a good example.
While a roof mounted NMO is better than a glass mount, that's not the main consideration in LE. For a scannist who doesn't want to drill holes, a well designed glass mount, properly installed, will receive better than the same antenna on a trunk-lip or cowl mount. This isn't a guess - I've measured the differences many times. There's 0.5db loss between the roof and the top of the rear window. There's 5db loss (more than 6 times as much signal loss) between the roof and a trunk-lip mount, to the opposite side of the trunk. (The loss from an antenna mounted on a trunk-lip mount through the quarter posts varies too much with frequency to mean anything.)
BTW, an antenna on a mag mount close to the center of the roof works the same as that same antenna moved to an NMO mount in the center of the roof that has the same length of the same cable on it at VHF-hi and above. (By 100 MHz the difference in grounding starts to show.) On VHF-lo and below, a mobile antenna - any mobile antenna - is a compromise with reality - there's no way to make an efficient and practical Hertzian antenna for 30 MHz that will fit on a car. (Non-Hertzian antenna technology may offer some solutions in the future.)