• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

GMRS: Use of Part 90 radios on Part 95

Status
Not open for further replies.

Knoxradio

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2018
Messages
29
§95.335 Operation of non-certified transmitters prohibited.
Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, no person shall operate a transmitter in any Personal Radio Service unless it is a certified transmitter; that is, a transmitter of a type which has obtained a grant of equipment certification for that service, pursuant to part 2, subpart J of this chapter
(a)Exceptions.*Under certain exceptions, non-certified Personal Radio Servicetransmitters, or*transmitters*certified for use in the land mobile radio services may be operated. Any such exceptions applicable to stations in a Personal Radio Service are set forth in the subpart governing that specific service.*See e.g.,*§§ 95.735*and 95.1735.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
So to summarize what some of you are saying, just because the chances of being caught are low it is okay to willfully engage in illegal behavior?

Morals and ethics, morals and ethics.

I think most reading this thread are trying to remain within the SPIRIT of the law. It is increasingly difficult due to the limited number of properly certified radios being marketed. I have this dilemma assembling a repeater. I can find certified transceivers that are 20 year old, but finding a 50W continuous duty power amplifier that has been certified for Part 95A is nearly impossible. I can see the discussion with the FCC inspector. "Here is my Frankenstein, it meets all FCC performance criteria of GMRS.

A far much bigger problem are those operating GMRS without a proper license. That is a bit harder to "splain away".
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
(a)Exceptions.*Under certain exceptions, non-certified Personal Radio Servicetransmitters, or*transmitters*certified for use in the land mobile radio services may be operated. Any such exceptions applicable to stations in a Personal Radio Service are set forth in the subpart governing that specific service.*See e.g.,*§§ 95.735*and 95.1735.

95.1735 seems to be a placeholder. Hmmm, I can think of some words!

PROPOSED RULE SECTION:

§ 95.1735 GMRS equipment certification
exception.
Notwithstanding the general
requirement of § 95.335, a Part 90 certified
transmitter programmed such that it fully complies with
the applicable technical requirements in
this subpart may be operated in the
GMRS band. This exception does not apply
for transmitter types where any
control, switch or other type of
adjustment—which, when manipulated,
can result in a violation of the rules—
is accessible to the user.
 
Last edited:

RogueSteward

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2018
Messages
72
(a)Exceptions.*Under certain exceptions, non-certified Personal Radio Servicetransmitters, or*transmitters*certified for use in the land mobile radio services may be operated. Any such exceptions applicable to stations in a Personal Radio Service are set forth in the subpart governing that specific service.*See e.g.,*§§ 95.735*and 95.1735.

I don't believe 95.735 counts as an exception when we are considering GMRS and FRS. The exception is for RCRS, Radio Control Radio Service. Now, on the other hand, as RFI-EMI-GUY pointed out, the exception for uncertified devices under GMRS use 95.1735 is listed, however it is blank. Maybe that rule is being written! Let's get on it!
 

bill4long

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,634
Location
Indianapolis
95.1735 seems to be a placeholder. Hmmm, I can think of some words!

PROPOSED RULE SECTION:

§ 95.1735 GMRS equipment certification
exception.
Notwithstanding the general
requirement of § 95.335, a Part 90 certified
transmitter programmed such that it fully complies with
the applicable technical requirements in
this subpart may be operated in the
GMRS band. This exception does not apply
for transmitter types where any
control, switch or other type of
adjustment—which, when manipulated,
can result in a violation of the rules—
is accessible to the user.

+1000
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,690
Location
United States
Is this a "I can't find a new Part 95 certified radio" or is it a "I don't want to pay for a new Part 95 certified radio"?

Randomly pulled the FCC ID for a Kenwood NX-800, FCC OET shows it has Part 95A.
You can buy these radios new right now, 45 watt, etc.
The software will not let you do 5KHz channels unless you contact Kenwood and get a W-license, which cost (last time I checked) $75.00.

So, they are out there, they are available, just not "cheap" for a new one. But from the tone of this thread, I'm guessing/hoping you guys are not stuck on the "cheap" part of this.

A quick search showed these Kenwood radios having valid 95A certifications:
NX-800 mobile
NX-300 portable
TK-3180 portable
TK-8180 mobile
TKR-840 repeater
Probably more, but that should be enough. Both the NX-800 and NX-300 are current production radios, well proven, lots of support, etc. You can even find them on the used market for a reasonable price.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
Is this a "I can't find a new Part 95 certified radio" or is it a "I don't want to pay for a new Part 95 certified radio"?

Randomly pulled the FCC ID for a Kenwood NX-800, FCC OET shows it has Part 95A.
You can buy these radios new right now, 45 watt, etc.
The software will not let you do 5KHz channels unless you contact Kenwood and get a W-license, which cost (last time I checked) $75.00.

So, they are out there, they are available, just not "cheap" for a new one. But from the tone of this thread, I'm guessing/hoping you guys are not stuck on the "cheap" part of this.

A quick search showed these Kenwood radios having valid 95A certifications:
NX-800 mobile
NX-300 portable
TK-3180 portable
TK-8180 mobile
TKR-840 repeater
Probably more, but that should be enough. Both the NX-800 and NX-300 are current production radios, well proven, lots of support, etc. You can even find them on the used market for a reasonable price.

Nice radio for the (used) price. What is the street price new?

Q1) Are you saying you need a W license for 25 KHz channels?

Q2) What FCC ID are you searching for this part 95A 16K0F3E capability? I am not finding it. You would do a great service by listing the Part 95A certifications for the radios you have listed.

These from the catalog sheet don't indicate any Part 95A 16K0F3E compliance:

https://fccid.io/K44378704
https://fccid.io/K44378705

From this catalog sheet:

http://comms.kenwood.com/common/pdf/download/09_NX-700-800Brochure.pdf

Can you provide those FCC ID's that show a grant with 95A?

While we are on the subject, has anyone ever seen a grant for the Bridgecom repeater that shows 95A? I know I haven't, though the company assures me....
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
The Midland radios do not produce full deviation as permitted in GMRS, they are just FRS/GMRS combos with a power amp.

The Cheap Chinese Radios are not much better.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

bill4long

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,634
Location
Indianapolis
I would if they would. Sadly they have not.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Did you ask them? By law, the FCCID "type acceptance" ID must be present on any transmitter/transceiver sold in the USA. The FCCID is not a secret or anything. If they won't provide you one, they are probably feeding you a line. They may be ignorant of the Part 90 requirement for GMRS and their UHF repeaters are OK if they locked them down to GMRS frequencies and limits. In any case, there's no good reason why they shouldn't provide the FCCID for any unit they sell (unless they are FOS.)
 
Last edited:

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
Did you ask them? By law, the FCCID "type acceptance" ID must be present on any transmitter/transceiver sold in the USA. The FCCID is not a secret or anything. If they won't provide you one, they are probably feeding you a line. They may be ignorant of the Part 90 requirement for GMRS and their TYT-based repeaters are OK. In any case, there's no good reason why they shouldn't provide the FCCID for any unit they sell (unless they are FOS.)
I hesitate to say they are FOS, but finding any GMRS certification on their website or FCC OET reveals nothing in Part 95A for the repeater.

I asked a rep at a ham fest booth if certified for GMRS and he said yes, I did not press him for the FCC ID at the fest. But my research reveals nothing.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

bill4long

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,634
Location
Indianapolis
I hesitate to say they are FOS, but finding any GMRS certification on their website or FCC OET reveals nothing in Part 95A for the repeater.

I asked a rep at a ham fest booth if certified for GMRS and he said yes, I did not press him for the FCC ID at the fest. But my research reveals nothing.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

Well, I emailed Bridgecom a few minutes ago, and they happily supplied me with the FCCID for their GMRS repeater (or the transmitter within the repeater) within a few minutes. He said it is O99TM-8402A. But an FCC search on that ID yields nothing, with or without the dash, or splitting the ID in half. I will see what he says.

https://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid

EDIT: I did manage to find it.
 
Last edited:

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,711
Well, I emailed Bridgecom a few minutes ago, and they happily supplied me with the FCCID for their GMRS repeater within a few minutes. He said it is O99TM-8402A. But an FCC search on that ID yields nothing, with or without the dash, or splitting the ID in half. I will see what he says.

https://www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid
I did a simple Google search and from fcc.io to link to the FCC OET , I see a Grant for a part 90 10K5F3E emission. Hardly wideband GMRS.

This looks like the ID I searched some months ago.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
 

bill4long

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,634
Location
Indianapolis
I did a simple Google search and from fcc.io to link to the FCC OET , I see a Grant for a part 90 10K5F3E emission. Hardly wideband GMRS.

This looks like the ID I searched some months ago.

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

None of the FCC docs for that radio mention 95A, only Part 90. Hmm. I fired an email back to him (Chuck Kraly), let's see what he says about it.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,690
Location
United States
Nice radio for the (used) price. What is the street price new?

List price for a new NX-800H (30 watt) $725.00. The NX-800HK (45 watt) $850.00
Easy to get something lower than list price.

The NX-300 portables are $684 for the basic keypad and $734 for the full keypad, list prices.

TK-3180 is $560 list and the TK-8180 is $604 for the 30 watt and $735 for the 45 watt, list.

Q1) Are you saying you need a W license for 25 KHz channels?

On the UHF models, yes. They are narrow band across the board. On the VHF models, if you wanted to use on on 2 meters, they will do wide from 136-150.1

Q2) What FCC ID are you searching for this part 95A 16K0F3E capability? I am not finding it. You would do a great service by listing the Part 95A certifications for the radios you have listed.

NX-300 = ALH378500 = https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo..._id=htp5xmdwJXz5oSNen96O/A==&fcc_id=ALH378500
NX-800 = K44378700 (30 watt) K44378702 (45 watt) = https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo..._id=EEu279uMCW03W5nvpmk6ZQ==&fcc_id=K44378700 https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo..._id=SKxE/0j7JzcXoWTvXnw+bw==&fcc_id=K44378702
TK-3180 = ALH37333110 = https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo...d=1ipBVkldMGhDuW3Zmoybgw==&fcc_id=ALH37333110
TK-8180 = K4437313110 (30 watt) K4437313210 (45 watt) = https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo...d=mQJdXuk4NgS25wdTS+jTOA==&fcc_id=K4437313110 https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo...d=2htwbvTNWxlzdajKZ5ggAw==&fcc_id=K4437313210
TKR-850 = ALH31113110 = https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo...d=cJmO5ihXxlnd1a6ufTBAoA==&fcc_id=ALH31113110

These from the catalog sheet don't indicate any Part 95A 16K0F3E compliance:

https://fccid.io/K44378704
https://fccid.io/K44378705

From this catalog sheet:

http://comms.kenwood.com/common/pdf/download/09_NX-700-800Brochure.pdf

That's a newer grant than the one I used. Same radio, different certification dates. So it looks like Kenwood changed something and put the radio in for new certification with a new FCC ID.

Can you provide those FCC ID's that show a grant with 95A?

See above.

While we are on the subject, has anyone ever seen a grant for the Bridgecom repeater that shows 95A? I know I haven't, though the company assures me....

I got saddled with a couple of those at work. I lost my photos I took when I was working on them. I do know they had TecNet mobiles inside. Running those TecNet mobiles through OET shows -NO- 95A certification, only Part 90.

However, if you run the FCC ID for the Bridgecom repeater itself, which has a completely different FCC ID than the individual mobiles, you do get 95A:
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo...id=M+a/Y/A/8YvcfWlT+VYtEg==&fcc_id=SK4MPTM40U
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/tcb/repo...id=M+a/Y/A/8YvcfWlT+VYtEg==&fcc_id=SK4MPTM40U
 

bill4long

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
1,634
Location
Indianapolis
However, if you run the FCC ID for the Bridgecom repeater itself, which has a completely different FCC ID than the individual mobiles, you do get 95A:

Thanks. I guess the guy at Bridgecom who I've been emailing doesn't realize that. He provided me with the TecNet mobile that they use inside the transmitter, which is cert 90 only.

Our exchange:

Question:

What is the FCCID type acceptance ID for the BCR-40U repeater? Thanks

Reply:

O99TM-8402A

Chuck Kraly, K0XM

BridgeCom Systems, Inc

http://www.youtube.com/c/BridgeComSystemsyoutubechannel

Customer Service and Technical Support

102 MO 92 Hwy, Ste C

Smithville, MO 64089

816-532-8451

Twoops!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top